| Literature DB >> 28531831 |
Binta Diémé1, Antoine Lefèvre1, Lydie Nadal-Desbarats2, Laurent Galineau1, Blandine Madji Hounoum1, Frédéric Montigny3, Hélène Blasco1, Christian R Andres1, Patrick Emond2, Sylvie Mavel4.
Abstract
We developed a multi-platform approach for the metabolome exploration of rat brain tissue, using liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (LC-MS), nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) and gas-chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The critical steps for metabolite exploration of cerebral tissues are tissue lysis and metabolites extraction. We first evaluated the impact of freeze-drying compared to wet tissue metabolites extraction using NMR and LC-MS with a reversed phase liquid chromatography. Then, we compared four metabolite extraction methods Based on the number of metabolites extracted, their intensity and their coefficient of variation (%CV), the most reproducible protocol (one-step extraction with acetonitrile on lyophilized material) was chosen to further evaluate the impact of sample mass on method performance (3, 6, and 9mg were essayed). GC-MS analysis was also investigated by analyzing four different methoximation/silylation derivatization combinations. The optimal analytical protocols were proposed to establish the reliability required to realize untargeted brain tissue metabolomics exploration. The most reliable workflow was then exemplified by analyzing three rat brain regions (cerebellum, frontal and parietal cortices, n=12) by 1H NMR, LC-MS and GC-MS, allowing their clustering based on their metabolic profiles. We present here an example of development of methodology that should be done before running analysis campaigns.Entities:
Keywords: Metabolic fingerprinting; Optimization; Tissular metabolomics; Untargeted methodology
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28531831 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2017.03.068
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Pharm Biomed Anal ISSN: 0731-7085 Impact factor: 3.935