Literature DB >> 28531451

New laparoscopic assisted percutaneous gastrostomy. Description and comparison with others gastrostomy types.

Pilar Serrano Aguayo1, Noelia Gros Herguido2, Juana Parejo Campos2, Antonio Barranco Moreno3, María Del Castillo Tous Romero2, José Luis Pereira Cunill2, Isaías Alarcón Del Agua3, María Socas Macias3, Pedro Pablo García Luna2, Salvador Morales Conde3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Gastrostomy feeding tube insertion has become a common procedure as it enables patients who require long term enteral feeding. Conventional surgical gastrostomies were the only way of gaining enteral access in patients in which it is not possible to pass an endoscope or a nasogastric tube required for endoscopic or radiological gastrostomies, and in patients in which certain anatomical abnormalities contraindicate performing these techniques. As conventional surgical gastrostomies are associated with high morbidity, especially gastric leakage around the tube, percutaneous laparoscopic assisted gastrostomy (PLAG) may be a better way to gain enteral access.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Observational study of a prospective cohort of 224 patients on whom a gastrostomy was performed for nutritional support between January 2009 and October 2015 at Virgen del Rocío University Hospital in Seville. The types of gastrostomies carried out were: percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG, n = 106), percutaneous radiological gastrostomy (PRG, n = 89), conventional surgical gastrostomy, Open Stamn or Laparoscopic Janeway (SG, n = 9) and percutaneous laparoscopic assisted gastrostomy (PLAG, n = 20), technique that we describe in detail. Short and long term complications are described.
RESULTS: Many more complications were seen in the conventional gastrostomy group than in the other three groups, especially leakage of gastric content around the tube, with burning and irritation of the skin (66% compared with 2.83% in PEG and 0% in PLAG and PRG). The group with the highest proportion of patients completely free of complications was PLAG (75%), whilst in the conventional surgical gastrostomy group, no patient was completely free of complications.
CONCLUSIONS: We found lower complication rate in PLAG than any other technique. We believe that PLAG could be preferred technique for patients on whom it is not possible to perform PEG or PRG, as it is safe and easy.
Copyright © 2016 European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Enteral access; Enteral nutrition; Nutrition; Nutritional support; PLAG; Percutaneous laparoscopic assisted gastrostomy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28531451     DOI: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2016.08.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Nutr ESPEN        ISSN: 2405-4577


  3 in total

Review 1.  Gastrostomy tubes: Fundamentals, periprocedural considerations, and best practices.

Authors:  Anand Rajan; Peerapol Wangrattanapranee; Jonathan Kessler; Trilokesh Dey Kidambi; James H Tabibian
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2022-04-27

2.  Laparoscopic Gastrostomy in Children: 10 Years of Experience.

Authors:  Ufuk Ateş; Anar Gurbanov; Gülnur Göllü; Nil Yaşam Taştekin; Sümeyye Sözduyar; Ergün Ergün; Aydın Yağmurlu; Murat Çakmak; Tanju Aktuğ; Hüseyin Dindar; Meltem Bingöl Koloğlu
Journal:  Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul       Date:  2018-09-23

Review 3.  Delivery of a nutritional prescription by enteral tube feeding in children with chronic kidney disease stages 2-5 and on dialysis-clinical practice recommendations from the Pediatric Renal Nutrition Taskforce.

Authors:  Lesley Rees; Vanessa Shaw; Leila Qizalbash; Caroline Anderson; An Desloovere; Laurence Greenbaum; Dieter Haffner; Christina Nelms; Michiel Oosterveld; Fabio Paglialonga; Nonnie Polderman; José Renken-Terhaerdt; Jetta Tuokkola; Bradley Warady; Johan Van de Walle; Rukshana Shroff
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 3.714

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.