| Literature DB >> 28531223 |
Dewi Megawati1, Sri Masyeni1, Benediktus Yohan2, Asri Lestarini1, Rahma F Hayati2, Febrina Meutiawati2, Ketut Suryana3, Tangking Widarsa1, Dewa G Budiyasa4, Ngurah Budiyasa3, Khin S A Myint2, R Tedjo Sasmono2.
Abstract
A high number of dengue cases are reported annually in Bali. Despite the endemicity, limited data on dengue is available for Bali localities. Molecular surveillance study was conducted to explore the clinical and virological characteristics of dengue patients in urban Denpasar and rural Gianyar areas in Bali during the peak season in 2015. A total of 205 adult dengue-suspected patients were recruited in a prospective cross-sectional study. Demographic and clinical information were obtained, and dengue screening was performed using NS1 and IgM/IgG ELISAs. Viral RNA was subsequently extracted from patients' sera for serotyping using conventional RT-PCR and Simplexa Dengue real-time RT-PCR, followed by genotyping with sequencing method. We confirmed 161 patients as having dengue by NS1 and RT-PCR. Among 154 samples successfully serotyped, the DENV-3 was predominant, followed by DENV-1, DENV-2, and DENV-4. Serotype predominance was different between Denpasar and Gianyar. Genotyping results classify DENV-1 isolates into Genotype I and DENV-2 as Cosmopolitan Genotype. The classification grouped isolates into Genotype I and II for DENV-3 and DENV-4, respectively. Clinical parameters showed no relationship between infecting serotypes and severity. We observed the genetic diversity of circulating DENV isolates and their relatedness with historical data and importation to other countries. Our data highlights the role of this tourist destination as a potential source of dengue transmission in the region.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28531223 PMCID: PMC5456401 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005483
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Demographic characteristics and diagnosis of study participants related to the infecting DENV serotypes.
| Variables | DENV-1 | DENV-2 | DENV-3 | DENV-4 | Mix | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N = 43 (%) | N = 26 (%) | N = 74 (%) | N = 6 (%) | N = 5 (%) | ||
| Male | 19 (44.2) | 10 (38.5) | 32 (43.2) | 3 (50.0) | 4 (80.0) | 0.549 |
| Female | 24 (55.8) | 16 (61.5) | 42 (56.8) | 3 (50.0) | 1 (20.0) | |
| Adult (14–50 yr.) | 36 (83.7) | 26 (100.0) | 66 (89.2) | 5 (83.3) | 4 (80.0) | 0.243 |
| Elderly (>50 yr.) | 7 (16.3) | 0 (0.0) | 8 (10.8) | 1 (16.7) | 1 (20.0) | |
| Denpasar | 14 (32.6) | 12 (46.2) | 41 (55.4) | 6 (100.0) | 1 (20.0) | |
| Gianyar | 29 (67.4) | 14 (53.8) | 33 (44.6) | 0 (0.0) | 4 (80.0) | |
| NS1 positive | 41 (95.3) | 22 (84.6) | 73 (98.6) | 6 (100.0) | 5 (100.0) | 0.054 |
| NS1 negative | 2 (4.7) | 4 (15.4) | 1 (1.4) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Primary | 8 (18.6) | 3 (11.5) | 13 (17.6) | 1 (16.7) | 0 (0.0) | 0.797 |
| Secondary | 35 (81.4) | 23 (88.5) | 61 (82.4) | 5 (83.3) | 5 (100.0) |
Clinical parameters observed in dengue patients in relation to the DENV serotypes*.
| Variables | DENV-1 (N = 43) | DENV-2 (N = 26) | DENV-3 (N = 74) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N (%) | RR (95% CI) | N (%) | RR (95% CI) | N (%) | RR (95% CI) | |
| Malaise | 41 (95.3%) | 1.45 (0.28–7.64) | 24 (92.3%) | 2.44 (0.40–14.90) | 68 (91.9%) | 0.79 (0.29–2.15) |
| Nausea | 36 (83.7%) | 0.69 (0.25–1.93) | 23 (88.5%) | 2.19 (0.46–10.35) | 66 (89.2%) | 1.03 (0.41–2.54) |
| Loss of appetite | 39 (90.7%) | 1.72 (0.51–5.79) | 18 (69.2%) | 62 (83.8%) | 1.26 (0.59–2.72) | |
| Headache | 35 (81.4%) | 1.14 (0.43–3.02) | 18 (69.2%) | 0.79 (0.27–2.29) | 53 (71.6%) | 1.01 (0.54–1.90) |
| Myalgia | 30 (69.8%) | 0.97 (0.41–2.26) | 16 (61.5%) | 1.57 (0.50–4.97) | 43 (58.1%) | 0.93 (0.50–1.73) |
| Vomiting | 22 (51.2%) | 0.78 (0.38–1.59) | 14 (53.8%) | 0.79 (0.33–1.93) | 44 (59.5%) | 1.19 (0.70–2.02) |
| Arthralgia | 26 (60.5%) | 0.89 (0.38–2.09) | 11 (42.3%) | 0.42 (0.14–1.32) | 39 (52.7%) | 1.27 (0.69–2.34) |
| Abdominal pain | 16 (37.2%) | 1.13 (0.55–2.32) | 11 (42.3%) | 2.16 (0.79–5.95) | 16 (21.6%) | 0.70 (0.37–1.32) |
| Retro-orbital pain | 12 (27.9%) | 1.00 (0.46–2.17) | 8 (30.8%) | 2.75 (0.85–8.84) | 16 (21.6%) | 0.77 (0.39–1.51) |
| Bleeding | 13 (30.2%) | 1.57 (0.78–3.13) | 3 (11.5%) | 0.59 (0.17–2.05) | 14 (18.9%) | 0.81 (0.44–1.50) |
*Analysis was performed excluding DENV-4 and mix infection groups due to small sample size. Relative risk (RR) and confidence intervals (CI) were calculated based on modified Poisson regression adjusted for age, gender, primary/secondary infection, recruitment site, and fever day at presentation.
Vital signs and hematological parameters in relation to the DENV serotypes*.
| Variables | DENV-1 (N = 43) | DENV-2 (N = 26) | DENV-3 (N = 74) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median | Median | Median | ||||
| (Range) | (Range) | (Range) | ||||
| Temperature (oC) | 37.7 | 0.530 | 37.7 | 0.582 | 38 | 0.333 |
| (35.7–40) | (36–39.3) | (36–40) | ||||
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 110 | 0.196 | 110 | 0.277 | 110 | 0.135 |
| (90–140) | (90–120) | (80–170) | ||||
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 80 | 70 | 0.807 | 70 | 0.107 | |
| (60–90) | (60–80) | (50–110) | ||||
| Pulse/minute | 82 | 0.121 | 84 | 0.899 | 84 | 0.426 |
| (66–100) | (78–110) | (72–108) | ||||
| Platelet count nadir (109/L) | 44 | 0.234 | 36 | 0.764 | 29.5 | 0.374 |
| (9–101) | (10–105) | (6–130) | ||||
| White blood cells count (109/L) | 2.2 | 0.817 | 2.0 | 0.321 | 2.1 | 0.599 |
| (0.6–3.94) | (0.8–3.95) | (0.6–6.4) | ||||
| Hematocrit level (%) | 43.2 | 0.886 | 41.9 | 0.892 | 41.9 | 0.920 |
| (34–81.8) | (29.4–51.1) | (33.5–79.1) | ||||
| Hemoglobin (g/dL) | 15.2 | 0.360 | 14.3 | 0.175 | 14.8 | 0.752 |
| (12.1–19.5) | (10.8–16.8) | (11.6–19.6) | ||||
*Analysis was performed excluding DENV-4 and Mix groups due to small sample size.
Relationship between DENV serotypes and disease severity*.
| Variables | N | DF | DHF | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N (%) | RR (95% Cl) | aRR (95% Cl) | N (%) | RR (95% Cl) | aRR (95% Cl) | ||
| DENV-1 | 43 | 26 (60.5) | 0.95 (0.41–2.19) | 1.24 (0.74–2.06) | 17 (39.5) | 1.09 (0.37–3.23) | 0.77 (0.43–1.39) |
| DENV-2 | 26 | 12 (46.2) | 0.73 (0.29–1.84) | 0.93 (0.48–1.80) | 14 (53.8) | 1.48 (0.49–4.50) | 1.07 (0.57–1.99) |
| DENV-3 | 74 | 37 (50) | 0.79 (0.66–1.24) | 1.00 (NA) | 37 (50) | 1.10 (0.80–1.51) | 1.00 (NA) |
*Relative risk (RR) and confidence intervals (CI) were calculated based on modified Poisson regression and adjusted (aRR) for age, gender, primary/secondary infection, recruitment site, and fever day at presentation. NA, not applicable.
Fig 1Phylogenetic tree and genotype classification of DENV-1 isolates from Bali generated using Bayesian inference method based on E gene sequences.
The Bali 2015 isolates (red font) were grouped into Genotype I based on classification by Goncalvez et al. [19], together with previous strains from Bali (blue font). Arabic numbers denote lineage grouping. The posterior probabilities of the clades were indicated as numbers in the node labels.
Fig 2Phylogenetic tree and genotypes classification of DENV-2 isolates from Bali generated using Bayesian inference method based on E gene sequences.
The Bali 2015 isolates (red font) were grouped into the Cosmopolitan Genotype based on classification by Twiddy et al. [20], together with previous strains from Bali (blue font). Further lineages were classified according to Ernst et al. [8] (in Arabic numbers). The posterior probabilities of the clades were indicated as numbers in the node labels.
Fig 3Phylogenetic tree and genotype classification of DENV-3 isolates from Bali generated using Bayesian inference method based on E gene sequences.
The Bali 2015 isolates (red font) were grouped into Genotype I based on classification by Lanciotti et al. [21], together with previous strains from Bali (blue font). Arabic numbers denote lineage grouping. The posterior probabilities of the clades were indicated as numbers in the node labels.
Fig 4Phylogenetic tree and genotypes classification of DENV-4 isolates from Bali generated using Bayesian inference method based on E gene sequences.
The Bali 2015 isolates (red font) were grouped into Genotype II based on classification by Lanciotti et al. [22], together with previous strains from Bali (blue font). Arabic numbers denote lineage grouping. The posterior probabilities of the clades were indicated as numbers in the node labels.