| Literature DB >> 28531126 |
Tayser Sumer Gaaz1,2, Abu Bakar Sulong3, Abdul Amir H Kadhum4, Ahmed A Al-Amiery5, Mohamed H Nassir6, Ahed Hameed Jaaz7.
Abstract
Nanotubular clay minerals, composed of aluminosilicate naturally structured in layers known as halloysite nanotubes (HNTs), have a significant reinforcing impact on polymer matrixes. HNTs have broad applications in biomedical applications, the medicine sector, implant alloys with corrosion protection and manipulated transportation of medicines. In polymer engineering, different research studies utilize HNTs that exhibit a beneficial enhancement in the properties of polymer-based nanocomposites. The dispersion of HNTs is improved as a result of pre-treating HNTs with acids. The HNTs' percentage additive up to 7% shows the highest improvement of tensile strength. The degradation of the polymer can be also significantly improved by doping a low percentage of HNTs. Both the mechanical and thermal properties of polymers were remarkably improved when mixed with HNTs. The effects of HNTs on the mechanical and thermal properties of polymers, such as ultimate strength, elastic modulus, impact strength and thermal stability, are emphasized in this study.Entities:
Keywords: mechanical properties; mechanical testing; nanostructure; physical properties; polymer-matrix composite; thermal analysis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28531126 PMCID: PMC6154593 DOI: 10.3390/molecules22050838
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Annual number of scientific research publications on halloysite in the past two decades (using the SciFinder Scholar search system to obtain the above data, as of December 2016).
Figure 2TEM micrograph of HNTs [21].
Figure 3Crystalline structure of halloysite [53].
Summary of the main properties [51,52].
| No. | Property | Advantageous Features | Applications |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Natural, nontoxic | Maintaining uniformly controlled release rate combined with initial over dosage prevention | Controlled and sustained release medicine |
| 2 | Fine particle size and superb dispersion | Realizable regardless of their forms such as; powders, creams, gels, or lotions, finally sprays form | Providing natural protection environment within the internal cavity ‘lumens’ of the nanotubes for the active agent during inharmonious and harsh material processing |
| 3 | High cation exchange capacity | Regeneration ability and increased efficacy | - |
| 4 | High aspect ratio | Trigger-capable release mode with adjustable release rate | Inhibiter, controlled medicine delivery |
| 5 | High porosity | Capable of loading multiple active agents simultaneously | Multiple active agents loading |
| 6 | High surface area | Reduces the volume of costly active agents | Pharmaceutical Industries |
| 7 | Non-swelling | Superior loading rates to other carriers, Fast adsorption rate and high adsorption capacity | Drug delivery, mechanical property enhancer |
| 8 | Biocompatible EPA 4A listed material | Biocompatibility: HNT has no cytotoxic effects which makes it suitable in drug delivery system. Tunable release: Incorporation HNT in drug delivery system enable them to sustainably release bioactive agents for various duration ranging from ten hours to months | 1. Medical implants devices |
| 9 | Processability: Markedly impressive in comparison to other nanoclays | Easily dispersible: The surface of HNT is lightly loaded with hydroxyl groups that limit its capability of developing hydrogen bonding between particles ‘intra-particles’. This can help meet the full range of processing requirements by the appropriate industry. In contrast to the surface of platy clay that are heavily stacked with hydroxyls group | 1. Can be used for manufacturing of interior and exterior parts |
| 10 | Compatibility: Polymers oriented | The surface interaction between nanoclays and the following polymers is; powerful and robust: Polar biopolymers: like; polyacrylates and polyelectrolytes. Medium polarity polymers: like polyvinylchloride. | Polymers with enhanced mechanical properties, thermal stability and fire retardant composites |
| 11 | Controllability of release (Sustainable) | The internal cavity of the HNT called ‘lumen’ has the capability to store molecules and controllably releasing them. HNT mechanical and chemical stability is considerably higher compared to other nanoparticles classified as conventional, like alumina and porous silica | 1. Smart materials (Polymeric composites with self-healing capability) |
Halloysite-polymer composites′ preparing methods [52].
| No. | Name of the Method | Method Outline to Obtain the Composites | Reaction/Notes/Results in Such Composites |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In situ polymerization | Dispersing fine halloysite tubes in a monomer | Monomers interact with the halloysite surface and form a uniform suspension |
| 2 | Solution casting | 1. Halloysite dispersal in the polymer solution
| Sandwiched multilayer structures
|
| 3 | Direct addition/extruder blending | 1. Addition of halloysite directly into the melted polymer
| Target: to obtain uniform distribution of the nanotubes in a polymer matrix |
| 4 | Deposition by layer | Layer-by-layer deposition in rotation of halloysite, polycations | Sequential substrate dipping in clay and polycation solutions was adopted to make the coating |
Figure 4Morphological characterization of combustion residue of modified ‘HNT-based nanocomposites’ with 10-per hundred rubber (phr) loading [9].
Figure 5SEM results of the natural HNTs [39].
Figure 6Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) of the nanocomposites′ fractured surface for neat PBS and PBS-HNT-based; (a) PBS0: neat PBS; (b) PBS1: PBS + 1 wt % HNT loading; (c) PBS3: PBS + 3 wt % HNT loading; (d) PBS5: PBS + 5 wt % HNT loading; and (e) PBS7: PBS + 7 wt % HNT loading; PBS: Poly(Butylene Succinate) [80].
Figure 7FTIR analysis of the halloysite [82].
Effects of HEDA, silane and urea modifications on the mechanical characteristics of the HNTs/PP nanocomposites [82].
| Blend Composition | σb (MPa) | E (MPa) |
|---|---|---|
| Neat PP | 36.3 ± 0.4 | 1340 ± 45 |
| PP + 5 wt % untreated HNT | 36.5 ± 0.4 | 1440 ± 84 |
| PP + 5 wt % HNT modified HEDA | 36.5 ± 0.3 | 1547 ± 35 |
| PP + 5 wt % HNT modified silane | 36.2 ± 0.6 | 1495 ± 65 |
| PP + 5 wt % HNT modified urea | 36.5 ± 0.8 | 1449 ± 30 |
Figure 8(a,b) TGA curves of neat PP, HNTs and PP/HNT nanocomposites in nitrogen [9].
Figure 9(a) Storage modulus (E') and (b) Tan δ with temperature sweep as a function of nanotube content for PP/HNT nanocomposites [49].
Influence of 5 wt % of halloysite on PP crystallinity [82].
| Sample | Crystallinity (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| Neat PP | 166.0 | 46.1 |
| PP + 5 wt % untreated HNT | 163.0 | 41.0 |
| PP + 5 wt % untreated HNT + 1 wt % DBMI | 164. 4 | 42.2 |
| PP + 5 wt % untreated HNT + 2 wt % DBMI | 159.9 | 40.3 |
| PP + 5 wt % untreated HNT + 3 wt % DBMI | 162.9 | 43.2 |
| PP + 5 wt % HNT modified HEDA | 162.7 | 43.5 |
| PP + 5 wt % HNT modified HEDA + 1 wt % DBMI | 159.7 | 37.3 |
| PP + 5 wt % HNT modified silane | 166.1 | 56.3 |
| PP + 5 wt % HNT modified silane + 1 wt % DBMI | 165.0 | 35.8 |
| PP + 5 wt % HNT modified urea | 170.0 | 22.3 |
| PP + 5 wt % HNT modified urea + 1 wt % DBMI | 170.0 | 25.5 |
Figure 10TGA curves of halloysite particles [84].
Figure 11(a) Storage modulus (G') and (b) complex viscosity (η*) as a function of frequency (ω) for pure PP and as-extruded PP/HNTs nanocomposites with different weight ratios [85].
Figure 12TGA and DTG curves of PHBV nanocomposites with 5 wt % nanoparticles [74].
Halloysite nanotubes-polymer nanocomposites in technology.
| Reference | Matrix | HNTs (wt %) | Process | Results of Nanocomposites | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HNTs’ Modification | Property | ±% | ||||
| [ | PP | 5 | Injection molding (internal) | Untreated HNTs | −2 | |
| HNTs modified DBMI | −1 | |||||
| HNTs modified HEDA | −2 | |||||
| HNTs modified Silane | +0.06 | |||||
| HNTs modified urea | +2 | |||||
| Untreated HNTs | −11 | |||||
| HNTs modified DBMI | −6 | |||||
| HNTs modified HEDA | −6 | |||||
| HNTs modified Silane | +22 | |||||
| HNTs modified urea | −51 | |||||
| Untreated HNTs | Tensile strength | +1 | ||||
| HNTs modified HEDA | +1 | |||||
| HNTs modified Silane | −2 | |||||
| HNTs modified urea | +1 | |||||
| Untreated HNTs | Young′s modulus | +7 | ||||
| HNTs modified HEDA | +15 | |||||
| HNTs modified Silane | +12 | |||||
| HNTs modified urea | +8 | |||||
| [ | PP | 0–8 | Injection molding (extruder) | +6 | ||
| DSC (cooling) | +5 | |||||
| DSC (melting) | +3 | |||||
| +23 | ||||||
| TGA (weight loss) | +1 | |||||
| [ | PP | 1–10 phr | Injection molding (extruder) | Tensile strength | +23 | |
| [ | PP | 0–30 phr | Injection molding (extruder) | TGA (weight loss) | +8 | |
| [ | EPDM | 0–100 phr | Compound mold | M459 | Tensile strength | +809 |
| M63 | Elongation at break | +306 | ||||
| [ | EPDM | 0–100 phr | Compound mold | Tensile strength | +874 | |
| Elongation at break | +306 | |||||
| [ | xSBR | 0–30 phr | Compound mold (co-coagulated) | Tensile strength | +53 | |
| Elongation at break | −33 | |||||
| Shore hardness | +45 | |||||
| [ | EP | 0–10 | Casting | +11 | ||
| Tensile strength | −3 | |||||
| [ | EP | 0–10 | −1 | |||
| Tensile strength | +8 | |||||
| [ | PA6 | 0–6 | Injection molding (extruder) | DSC (cooling) | +14 | |
| +13 | ||||||
| +22 | ||||||
| +9 | ||||||
| Tensile strength | +30 | |||||
| [ | PA6 | 0–10 phr | Injection molding (extruder) | +48 | ||
| [ | PA6 | 0–30 | Compound molding (extruder) | +2 | ||
| −1 | ||||||
| +8 | ||||||
| [ | PA12 | 0-10 | Compression molding | TGA (weight loss) | +2 | |
| [ | PS | 0–5 | Injection molding | DSC | −7 | |
| TGA (weight loss) | +7 | |||||
| [ | Starch | 0-8 | Injection molding (extruder) | M29 | Tensile strength | +29 |
| [ | PSt | 0–9 | Casting | PEG | Tensile strength | +59 |
| [ | PHBV | 0–5 | Injection molding (extruder) | +11 | ||
| +2 | ||||||
| Tensile strength | +3 | |||||
| +2 | ||||||
| +11 | ||||||
| [ | PBS | 0–7 | Tensile strength | +7 | ||