| Literature DB >> 28531106 |
Paola Fanzio1, Chi-Tung Chang2, Maciej Skolimowski3, Simone Tanzi4, Luigi Sasso5.
Abstract
We present here an electrochemical sensor microsystem for the monitoring of pH. The all-polymeric device is comprised of a cyclic olefin copolymer substrate, a 200 nm-thin patterned layer of conductive polymer (PEDOT), and a 70 nm electropolymerized layer of a pH sensitive conductive polymer (polyaniline). The patterning of the fluidic (microfluidic channels) and conductive (wiring and electrodes) functional elements was achieved with a single soft PDMS mold via a single embossing step process. A post-processing treatment with ethylene glycol assured the functional enhancement of the electrodes, as demonstrated via an electrical and electrochemical characterization. A surface modification of the electrodes was carried out, based on voltammetric electropolymerization, to obtain a thin layer of polyaniline. The mechanism for pH sensing is based on the redox reactions of the polyaniline layer caused by protonation. The sensing performance of the microsystem was finally validated by monitoring its potentiometric response upon exposure to a relevant range of pH.Entities:
Keywords: PEDOT; organic electrode; pH sensing; soft embossing
Year: 2017 PMID: 28531106 PMCID: PMC5470914 DOI: 10.3390/s17051169
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Scheme of the fabrication process.
Figure 2(a) Design of the device. A microfluidic channel is integrated with two PEDOT electrodes with oblique sidewalls (in red); (b) Top-view optical image of the device embossed on a PEDOT/TOPAS substrate; (c) Height profile of the embossed microchannel.
Figure 3(a) Effect of PEDOT:IPA solution concentration on obtained film resistance (error bars represent one standard deviation on 4 measurements); (b) Voltage/Current curves measured on a spin-coated film (1000 rpm, 30 s, 500 rpm/s) made of PEDOT: PSS (empty circles), PEDOT-IPA 6:1 (grey circles) and after the treatment with ethylene glycol (black square). Lines correspond to the linear fit for each curve.
Figure 4(a) Cyclic voltammetry measured in the aniline solution (0.05 M aniline + 0.1 M KCl) recorded at a scan rate equal to 10 mV/s; (b) PANI deposition by 80 CV cycles at 100 mV/s scan rate.
Figure 5SEM images of the indicator electrode surface: (a) before the PANI deposition; (b) after the PANI deposition. CV curves at different scan rates in KCl 0.1 M (c) before the PANI deposition; (d) after the PANI deposition.
Figure 6(a) Open current potential (OCP) recorded at different pH values in function of the time; (b) Mean values for the OCP at each pH value (error bars represent the standard deviation).