Literature DB >> 28530177

Effect of the Method for Creatinine Measurement.

Boris Betz, Theresa Büchner, Michael Kiehntopf.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2017        PMID： 28530177      PMCID： PMC5443983          DOI： 10.3238/arztebl.2017.0300b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int        ISSN： 1866-0452            Impact factor:   5.594


× No keyword cloud information.
  3 in total

1.  Specificity characteristics of 7 commercial creatinine measurement procedures by enzymatic and Jaffe method principles.

Authors:  Neil Greenberg; William L Roberts; Lorin M Bachmann; Elizabeth C Wright; R Neil Dalton; Jack J Zakowski; W Greg Miller
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 2.  Electronic Alerts for Acute Kidney Injury.

Authors:  Michael Haase; Andreas Kribben; Walter Zidek; Jürgen Floege; Christian Albert; Berend Isermann; Bernt-Peter Robra; Anja Haase-Fielitz
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  A Risk Assessment of the Jaffe vs Enzymatic Method for Creatinine Measurement in an Outpatient Population.

Authors:  Robert L Schmidt; Joely A Straseski; Kalani L Raphael; Austin H Adams; Christopher M Lehman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 3.240
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.