| Literature DB >> 28529969 |
Bruno Moukette Moukette1, Vicky Jocelyne Ama Moor1, Cacral Prosper Biapa Nya2, Pauline Nanfack1, Francine Tankeu Nzufo1, Marcel Azabji Kenfack1, Jeanne Yonkeu Ngogang1, Constant Anatole Pieme1.
Abstract
Introduction. Several plant preparations like a mixture of aqueous extracts of Spilanthes africana; Portulaca oleracea; and Sida rhombifolia are currently utilized in Foumban (West Cameroon) to manage diabetes. The aim of this study is to investigate the antidiabetic property of the aqueous mixture of three plant extracts (1 : 1 : 1) on streptozotocin induced diabetes rats. Methods. Diabetes was induced to rats by intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of streptozotocin (STZ) at a dose of 50 mg/kg b.w. The diabetic rats received different dosages of the mixture of extracts for 21 days and glibenclamide 6.5 mg/kg b.w. as positive control. Results. The results showed that the mixture of extracts significantly (p < 0.05) decreased the level of the glycaemia, the total cholesterol, triglyceride, and LDL-cholesterol as well as MDA, AST, ALT, and creatinine levels. It also increased significantly the concentration of HDL-cholesterol, glutathione, and TAOS. A great reduction of the atherogenic indexes CT/HDL and LDL/HDL of the treated groups was observed. Each extract and the mixture demonstrated significant scavenging property on DPPH and OH radicals and present a good antioxidant property. Conclusion. The mixture of plant extracts has hypoglycemic, antioxidant, and hypolipidemic properties and can be used for the management of diabetes mellitus.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28529969 PMCID: PMC5424193 DOI: 10.1155/2017/9501675
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int Sch Res Notices ISSN: 2356-7872
Information of plants used: antioxidant and antiradical properties.
| Plant species/family/ | Vernacular names/area in Cameroon/place of collection and date | Part of plant used (extraction | In vitro antiradical and antioxidant activities of the extract | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IC50 ( | Antioxidant (at 50 | |||||
| DPPH | OH | Reducing power | Antioxidant potential | |||
|
|
| Leaves | 2.93 | 3.47 | 0.15 | 125 |
|
|
| Leaves | 3.07 | 3.24 | 0.14 | 127.5 |
|
|
| Leaves | 2.79 | 3.21 | 0.17 | 132 |
|
| 2.97 | 5.62 | 0.12 | 135 | ||
|
| 1.65 | 2.9 | 0.24 | 220 | ||
aPlants were identified at the Cameroon National Herbarium (HNC).
bThe percentage of the aqueous extract.
Figure 1Effects of MTPE on blood glucose of normal and diabetic rats after 21 days of treatment. Values are expressed as means ± standard error (n = 5).
Figure 2Effects of MTPE on weight variation of rats after 21 days of treatment. Values are expressed as means ± standard error (n = 5).
Effects of MTPE on lipid profile of normal and diabetic rats.
| Groups | Parameters | TC/HDLC | LDLC/HDLC | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HDL-cholesterol (mg/dL) | LDL-cholesterol (mg/dL) | Triglycerides (mg/dL) | Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | |||
| Untreated control | 43.20 ± 2.16 | 17.00 ± 2.12 | 41.00 ± 1.58 | 69.20 ± 1.92 | 1.43 ± 0.70 | 0.25 ± 0.58 |
| Diabetic control | 11.80 ± 1.30 | 78.20 ± 5.89 | 134.80 ± 3.63 | 117.60 ± 5.02 | 7.74 ± 1.24 | 4.91 ± 1.03 |
| Diabetic + glibenclamide 6.5 mg/kg | 40.20 ± 1.78a | 30.40 ± 2.79a | 56.80 ± 3.83a | 82.80 ± 2.16a | 1.93 ± 0.88a | 0.64 ± 0.90a |
| Diabetic + MTPE 50 mg/kg | 34.00 ± 3.08a | 30.60 ± 4.92a | 119.40 ± 7.50a | 89.40 ± 4.21a | 2.83 ± 2.26a | 1.01 ± 0.17a |
| Diabetic + MTPE 100 mg/kg | 41.20 ± 1.78a | 11.80 ± 2.04a | 86.60 ± 1.81a | 71.00 ± 2.23a | 2.16 ± 0.22a | 0.65 ± 0.55a |
| Diabetic + MTPE 200 mg/kg | 48.20 ± 3.03a | 6.60 ± 5.47a | 47.20 ± 1.78a | 65.00 ± 3.00a | 1.53 ± 0.07a | 0.31 ± 0.17a |
Values are expressed as means ± standard error (n = 5).
Values affected with letter a are significantly different (p < 0.05) from the diabetic control.
Values affected with ∗ are significantly different (p < 0.001) from the normal control.
Effects of MTPE on markers of toxicity and antioxidant activity after 21 days of treatment.
| Groups | Parameters | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALT | AST | Creatinine | MDA | Glutathione ( | TAOS ( | Total protein | |
| Untreated control | 64.20 ± 2.48 | 78.80 ± 6.37 | 22.0 ± 0.44 | 1.60 ± 0.25 | 9.28 ± 1.96 | 23.00 ± 0.02 | 97.80 ± 4.32 |
| Diabetic control | 156.20 ± 2.68 | 205.20 ± 0.44 | 130.0 ± 0.70 | 4.48 ± 0.63 | 5.10 ± 0.70 | 7.00 ± 0.04 | 40.80 ± 2.16 |
| Diabetic + glibenclamide 6.5 mg/kg | 68.20 ± 3.19b | 87.40 ± 4.33b | 44.0 ± 0.54b | 2.94 ± 0.28a | 14.22 ± 3.47a | 3.90 ± 0.03a | 80.20 ± 2.16a |
| Diabetic + MTPE 50 mg/kg | 117.00 ± 8.94b | 84.00 ± 5.78b | 68.0 ± 0.44b | 3.46 ± 0.42a | 9.06 ± 1.03a | 16.00 ± 0.03a | 75.60 ± 4.27a |
| Diabetic + MTPE 100 mg/kg | 95.00 ± 2.82b | 84.80 ± 2.94b | 50.0 ± 1.22b | 2.34 ± 0.41a | 13.90 ± 2.35a | 23.00 ± 0.02a | 81.00 ± 4.24a |
| Diabetic + MTPE 200 mg/kg | 60.00 ± 4.18b | 59.20 ± 3.03b | 38.0 ± 0.44b | 1.72 ± 0.17a | 15.50 ± 2.41a | 26.00 ± 0.01a | 90.40 ± 3.28a |
Values are expressed as means ± standard error (n = 5).
Values affected with the letters a and b are significantly different (p < 0.005) from the diabetic control.
Values affected with ∗ are significantly different (p < 0.001) from the normal control.