Literature DB >> 28529792

The crystal structure of (C2H9N2)2[Zn3(HPO3)4], a three-dimensional zincophosphite framework containing 16-membered rings templated by the unsymmetrical dimethyl hydrazinium cation.

Judita Katinaitė1, William T A Harrison1.   

Abstract

The solution-mediated synthesis and crystal structure of 1,1-di-methyl-hydrazinium tetra-phoshonoatotrizincate, (C2H9N2)2[Zn3(HPO3)4], are described. The anionic [Zn3(HPO3)4]2- framework is built up from alternating ZnO4 tetra-hedra and HPO3 pseudo-pyramids to generate a three-dimensional 4,3-net encapsulating the C2H9N2+ cations. The organic cations, which are protonated at their central N atoms, occupy pores delineated by large 16-membered polyhedral rings and inter-act with the framework by way of N-H⋯O hydrogen bonds and possible C-H⋯O inter-actions. One of the zinc ions lies on a crystallographic twofold rotation axis and all the other atoms lie on general positions. The crystal studied was found to be rotationally twinned about the [001] axis in reciprocal space in a 0.585 (5):0.415 (5) ratio.

Entities:  

Keywords:  crystal structure; open framework; unsymmetrical dimethyl hydrazine; zinc phosphite

Year:  2017        PMID: 28529792      PMCID: PMC5418800          DOI: 10.1107/S2056989017005758

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun


Chemical context

Organically templated zinc phosphites are now a well-established family of open frameworks (e.g.: Phillips et al., 2002 ▸; Luo et al., 2010 ▸; Wang et al., 2011 ▸; Dong et al., 2015 ▸; Huang et al., 2017 ▸). As part of our occasional studies in this area (Harrison & McNamee, 2010 ▸), we now describe the synthesis and structure of the title compound, (I), which represents the first example of a protonated unsymmetrical dimethyl hydrazine (C2H8N2 or UDMH is the neutral mol­ecule and C2H9N2 + is the cation) acting as a templating agent for an inorganic open framework. So far as we are aware, the only crystal structures containing C2H9N2 + that have been reported previously are mol­ecular salts with different simple counter-ions (Katinaitė & Harrison, 2016 ▸, and references therein).

Structural commentary

The asymmetric unit of (I) comprises two zinc cations (Zn1 with site symmetry 2 and Zn2 on a general position), two HPO3 2− hydrogen phosphite groups and one C2H9N2 + cation (Fig. 1 ▸). Both zinc ions adopt their usual tetra­hedral coord­ination geometries (Table 1 ▸) to four nearby O atoms with mean Zn—O separations of 1.942 and 1.945 Å for Zn1 and Zn2, respectively. The range of O—Zn—O bond angles for Zn1 of 100.0 (2)–121.0 (2)° indicates considerable distortion from the ideal tetra­hedral value of 109.5°; the spread of values for Zn2 of 99.8 (2)–115.1 (2)° is somewhat smaller. Bond-valence-sum values (in valence units; Brown & Altermatt, 1985 ▸) for Zn1 and Zn2 of 2.11 and 2.09, respectively, are in adequate agreement with the expected values of 2.00.
Figure 1

The asymmetric unit of (I) expanded to show the zinc coordination polyhedra (50% displacement ellipsoids). For symmetry codes, see Table 1 ▸.

Table 1

Selected geometric parameters (Å, °)

Zn1—O41.938 (5)P1—O21.504 (5)
Zn1—O4i 1.938 (5)P1—O11.515 (6)
Zn2—O5ii 1.936 (6)P1—O31.533 (5)
Zn2—O2iii 1.943 (5)P2—O51.500 (6)
Zn2—O6iv 1.946 (5)P2—O61.520 (5)
Zn2—O11.954 (6)P2—O41.529 (5)
    
P1—O1—Zn2128.0 (3)P2—O4—Zn1123.6 (3)
P1—O2—Zn2iii 140.3 (3)P2—O5—Zn2v 138.4 (4)
P1—O3—Zn1137.2 (3)P2—O6—Zn2vi 120.8 (3)

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) ; (iv) ; (v) ; (vi) .

Both phospho­rus atoms in (I) display their expected HPO3 pseudo-n>an class="Species">tetra­hedral geometries with mean P—O distances (1.517 Å for P1 and 1.516 Å for P2) and O—P—O angles (112.7° for P1 and 112.6° for P2) that are consistent with previous results (Dong et al., 2015 ▸). P1 deviates from its pyramid of attached O atoms by 0.418 (4) and the equivalent deviation for P2 is 0.420 (3) Å. The structure of (I) is completed by the charge-balancing C2n>an class="Species">H9N2 + cation, which is protonated at the central (methyl­ated) N2 atom, as is most commonly seen for this species (Katinaitė & Harrison, 2016 ▸). The C—N and N—N bond lengths are indistinguishable and N2 deviates from the plane of N1, C1 and C2 by 0.434 (8) Å. In the extended framework structure of (I), the zinc- and phospho­rus-centred building units strictly alternate: every O atom forms a Zn—O—P bridge (mean angle = 131.4°), thus there are no ‘dangling’ Zn—OH2, P=O or P—OH bonds as found in some zincophosphite frameworks (Shi et al., 2004 ▸; Liu et al., 2008 ▸), which is fully consistent with the 3:4 Zn:P stoichiometry of the anionic [Zn3(HPO3)4]2− component of the structure (Harrison & McNamee, 2010 ▸). In addition, there are no Zn—N bonds (direct metal-to-template links) in (I); compare Kirkpatrick & Harrison (2004 ▸), Lin et al. (2004 ▸) and Harrison (2006 ▸). The polyhedral connectivity in (I) can be broken down as follows: the Zn2, P1 and P2 polyhedra form four-ring (i.e.: a loop of two Zn atoms and two P atoms) chains, with the zinc atoms as the linking nodes, which propagate alternately in the [10] and [110] directions with respect to the c-axis direction. Atom Zn1 serves to link these criss-cross chains into a three-dimensional open framework. If the template is omitted, a PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▸) analysis indicates that 878 Å3 (43.3%) of the unit cell is ‘empty space’ and the ‘framework density’ (FD) (number of Zn and P atoms per 1000 Å3; Brunner & Meier, 1989 ▸) of (I) is 13.8. This low FD is comparable to that of the unusual open-framework MAPSO-46, which contains Mg, Al, P and Si as its tetra­hedral framework atoms (Bennett & Marcus, 1988 ▸). When the template is included in the calculation, PLATON indicates no free space, suggesting that the template is a ‘snug fit’ within the inorganic framework of (I). In the extended structure, large 16-ring pores (Figs. 2 ▸ and 3 ▸) are apparent in the framework, which alternately propagate in [10] and [110] with respect to the c-axis direction. Measured atom-to-atom, the 16-ring has a dimension of ∼5.7 × 14.6 Å. Pairs of template cations lie roughly in the plane of the 16-rings and inter­act with framework oxygen atoms by way of N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds (Table 2 ▸). It is notable that the H⋯O separation for the charge-assisted N2+—H3N⋯O3 bond is much shorter than the H⋯O separations for the terminal N1H2 grouping. Within the asymmetric unit, an (7) loop is apparent (Fig. 1 ▸). Possible weak C—H⋯O inter­actions (Table 2 ▸) consolidate the structure.
Figure 2

Fragment of (I) showing a 16-ring channel occupied side-by-side by two C2H9N2 + template cations.

Figure 3

The unit-cell packing in (I) viewed approximately along [110] with the framework represented topologically (i.e. as Zn—P links).

Table 2

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N1—H1N⋯O10.912.343.130 (9)146
N1—H2N⋯O6vii 0.912.353.133 (9)144
N2—H3N⋯O31.001.792.762 (8)163
C1—H1A⋯O1v 0.982.503.474 (11)173
C1—H1C⋯O5viii 0.982.503.295 (11)138
C2—H2C⋯O2ix 0.982.433.355 (9)157

Symmetry codes: (v) ; (vii) ; (viii) ; (ix) .

Database survey

A survey of of the Cambridge Structural Database (Groom et n>an class="Chemical">al., 2016 ▸: updated to April 2017) for organically templated zinc phosphite frameworks (those containing a Zn—O—P—H fragment) revealed 172 matches.

Synthesis and crystallization

Caution! UDMH is toxic, potentially carcinogenic and may form explosive mixtures with oxidizing agents: all appropriate safety precautions should be taken when handling it. Zinc oxide (1.63 g), phospho­rus acid (1.64 g) and 20 ml of a 1.0 M aqueous UDMH solution were mixed in a 1:1:1 molar ratio in a sealed PTFE bottle and heated to 353 K for 24 h and then cooled to room temperature over a few hours. Product recovery by vacuum filtration yielded some colourless blocks of (I) accompanied by an unidentified white powder.

Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 3 ▸. The N-bound H atoms were located in difference mapn>s, relocated to idealized locations (N—H = 0.91–1.00 Å) and refined as riding atoms. The other hydrogen atoms were placed geometrically (P—H = 1.32, C—H = 0.98 Å) and refined as riding atoms. The constraint U iso(H) = 1.2U eq(carrier) or 1.5U eq(methyl carrier) was applied in all cases. The methyl groups were allowed to rotate, but not to tip, to best fit the electron density. The crystal chosen for data collection was found to be rotationally twinned about the [001] axis in reciprocal space in a 0.585 (5):0.415 (5) ratio.
Table 3

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula(C2H9N2)2[Zn3(HPO3)4]
M r 638.24
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, C2/c
Temperature (K)100
a, b, c (Å)15.1154 (5), 8.7269 (3), 16.1675 (6)
β (°)108.156 (1)
V3)2026.48 (12)
Z 4
Radiation typeMo Kα
μ (mm−1)3.90
Crystal size (mm)0.19 × 0.11 × 0.05
 
Data collection
DiffractometerRigaku Mercury CCD
Absorption correctionMulti-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2004)
T min, T max 0.527, 1.000
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections2273, 2273, 2169
(sin θ/λ)max−1)0.650
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.068, 0.239, 1.22
No. of reflections2273
No. of parameters127
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3)1.51, −1.24

Computer programs: CrysAlis PRO (Rigaku, 2015 ▸), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▸), SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015 ▸), ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 2012 ▸), ATOMS (Shape Software, 2005 ▸) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010 ▸).

Crystpan class="Chemical">al structure: contains datablock(s) I, globn>an class="Chemical">al. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989017005758/sj5526sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989017005758/sj5526Isup2.hkl CCDC reference: 1544227 Additionpan class="Chemical">al supn>porting information: crystpan class="Chemical">allographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
(C2H9N2)2[Zn3(HPO3)4]F(000) = 1280
Mr = 638.24Dx = 2.092 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 15.1154 (5) ÅCell parameters from 6272 reflections
b = 8.7269 (3) Åθ = 2.6–27.6°
c = 16.1675 (6) ŵ = 3.90 mm1
β = 108.156 (1)°T = 100 K
V = 2026.48 (12) Å3Block, colourless
Z = 40.19 × 0.11 × 0.05 mm
Rigaku Mercury CCD diffractometer2169 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
ω scansθmax = 27.5°, θmin = 2.7°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2004)h = −19→18
Tmin = 0.527, Tmax = 1.000k = −11→11
2273 measured reflectionsl = −11→20
2273 independent reflections
Refinement on F2Hydrogen site location: mixed
Least-squares matrix: fullH-atom parameters constrained
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.068w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.1587P)2 + 13.6003P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.239(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
S = 1.22Δρmax = 1.51 e Å3
2273 reflectionsΔρmin = −1.24 e Å3
127 parametersExtinction correction: SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
0 restraintsExtinction coefficient: 0.011 (2)
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refined as a 2-component twin with components rotated about (001) in reciprocal space
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Zn10.00000.16565 (13)0.25000.0076 (4)
Zn20.36570 (6)0.37073 (9)0.48484 (5)0.0096 (4)
P10.15444 (13)0.3885 (2)0.37817 (11)0.0091 (5)
H10.11470.52480.36620.011*
P2−0.01597 (13)−0.0917 (2)0.11747 (11)0.0088 (5)
H2−0.0253−0.19700.17280.011*
O10.2557 (4)0.4152 (7)0.3858 (3)0.0193 (12)
O20.1393 (5)0.3246 (6)0.4592 (3)0.0180 (12)
O30.1081 (4)0.2975 (7)0.2948 (3)0.0160 (11)
O40.0428 (4)0.0362 (6)0.1728 (3)0.0146 (11)
O50.0321 (4)−0.1690 (6)0.0604 (4)0.0169 (12)
O6−0.1139 (4)−0.0379 (6)0.0684 (3)0.0124 (10)
C10.1591 (7)0.2877 (11)0.0880 (5)0.028 (2)
H1A0.18210.18250.10020.043*
H1B0.18470.33390.04520.043*
H1C0.09090.28670.06490.043*
C20.1529 (8)0.5365 (10)0.1562 (6)0.029 (2)
H2A0.18180.59630.20910.043*
H2B0.08520.53580.14390.043*
H2C0.16830.58270.10720.043*
N10.2898 (6)0.3663 (9)0.2063 (5)0.0249 (17)
H1N0.30670.38800.26420.030*
H2N0.31700.43460.17930.030*
N20.1884 (5)0.3781 (7)0.1691 (4)0.0132 (13)
H3N0.16080.32800.21100.016*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Zn10.0064 (7)0.0080 (6)0.0076 (6)0.0000.0008 (4)0.000
Zn20.0093 (6)0.0109 (5)0.0078 (5)−0.0032 (3)0.0015 (4)0.0003 (3)
P10.0106 (10)0.0085 (8)0.0076 (8)−0.0011 (6)0.0021 (7)0.0010 (6)
P20.0085 (9)0.0093 (8)0.0077 (8)0.0008 (6)0.0014 (7)0.0001 (6)
O10.020 (3)0.024 (3)0.012 (2)−0.006 (2)0.001 (2)0.002 (2)
O20.033 (3)0.009 (2)0.013 (2)−0.002 (2)0.009 (2)0.0000 (18)
O30.013 (3)0.023 (3)0.012 (2)−0.010 (2)0.004 (2)−0.006 (2)
O40.015 (3)0.014 (2)0.014 (2)0.000 (2)0.002 (2)−0.006 (2)
O50.025 (3)0.012 (2)0.016 (2)0.005 (2)0.009 (2)−0.0021 (19)
O60.008 (3)0.016 (2)0.013 (2)0.000 (2)0.0020 (19)0.004 (2)
C10.039 (5)0.024 (4)0.015 (3)−0.003 (4)−0.002 (4)−0.008 (3)
C20.048 (6)0.020 (4)0.024 (4)0.005 (4)0.020 (4)0.006 (3)
N10.019 (4)0.034 (4)0.020 (3)−0.004 (3)0.004 (3)0.002 (3)
N20.017 (4)0.013 (3)0.011 (3)−0.004 (2)0.008 (3)−0.001 (2)
Zn1—O41.938 (5)O2—Zn2iii1.943 (5)
Zn1—O4i1.938 (5)O5—Zn2v1.936 (6)
Zn1—O3i1.945 (5)O6—Zn2vi1.946 (5)
Zn1—O31.945 (5)C1—N21.475 (9)
Zn2—O5ii1.936 (6)C1—H1A0.9800
Zn2—O2iii1.943 (5)C1—H1B0.9800
Zn2—O6iv1.946 (5)C1—H1C0.9800
Zn2—O11.954 (6)C2—N21.474 (10)
P1—O21.504 (5)C2—H2A0.9800
P1—O11.515 (6)C2—H2B0.9800
P1—O31.533 (5)C2—H2C0.9800
P1—H11.3200N1—N21.465 (10)
P2—O51.500 (6)N1—H1N0.9100
P2—O61.520 (5)N1—H2N0.9100
P2—O41.529 (5)N2—H3N1.0000
P2—H21.3200
O4—Zn1—O4i108.7 (3)P1—O3—Zn1137.2 (3)
O4—Zn1—O3i121.0 (2)P2—O4—Zn1123.6 (3)
O4i—Zn1—O3i100.0 (2)P2—O5—Zn2v138.4 (4)
O4—Zn1—O3100.0 (2)P2—O6—Zn2vi120.8 (3)
O4i—Zn1—O3121.0 (2)N2—C1—H1A109.5
O3i—Zn1—O3107.4 (4)N2—C1—H1B109.5
O5ii—Zn2—O2iii99.8 (2)H1A—C1—H1B109.5
O5ii—Zn2—O6iv115.1 (2)N2—C1—H1C109.5
O2iii—Zn2—O6iv110.8 (2)H1A—C1—H1C109.5
O5ii—Zn2—O1107.5 (3)H1B—C1—H1C109.5
O2iii—Zn2—O1114.1 (3)N2—C2—H2A109.5
O6iv—Zn2—O1109.3 (2)N2—C2—H2B109.5
O2—P1—O1114.2 (3)H2A—C2—H2B109.5
O2—P1—O3115.0 (3)N2—C2—H2C109.5
O1—P1—O3108.9 (3)H2A—C2—H2C109.5
O2—P1—H1106.0H2B—C2—H2C109.5
O1—P1—H1106.0N2—N1—H1N109.3
O3—P1—H1106.0N2—N1—H2N109.2
O5—P2—O6113.4 (3)H1N—N1—H2N109.5
O5—P2—O4112.6 (3)N1—N2—C2114.3 (7)
O6—P2—O4111.9 (3)N1—N2—C1108.3 (6)
O5—P2—H2106.1C2—N2—C1112.4 (7)
O6—P2—H2106.1N1—N2—H3N107.2
O4—P2—H2106.1C2—N2—H3N107.2
P1—O1—Zn2128.0 (3)C1—N2—H3N107.2
P1—O2—Zn2iii140.3 (3)
O2—P1—O1—Zn22.2 (6)O5—P2—O4—Zn1177.2 (3)
O3—P1—O1—Zn2−127.8 (4)O6—P2—O4—Zn148.1 (4)
O1—P1—O2—Zn2iii−86.8 (7)O6—P2—O5—Zn2v110.4 (6)
O3—P1—O2—Zn2iii40.2 (8)O4—P2—O5—Zn2v−18.0 (7)
O2—P1—O3—Zn128.0 (7)O5—P2—O6—Zn2vi−68.4 (4)
O1—P1—O3—Zn1157.6 (5)O4—P2—O6—Zn2vi60.3 (4)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1N···O10.912.343.130 (9)146
N1—H2N···O6vii0.912.353.133 (9)144
N2—H3N···O31.001.792.762 (8)163
C1—H1A···O1v0.982.503.474 (11)173
C1—H1C···O5viii0.982.503.295 (11)138
C2—H2C···O2ix0.982.433.355 (9)157
  6 in total

1.  Poly[piperazinium2+ [hexa-mu-hydrogen phosphito-mu-piperazine-pentazinc(II)]].

Authors:  William T A Harrison
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C       Date:  2006-03-31       Impact factor: 1.172

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  A highly flexible inorganic framework with amphiphilic amine assemblies as templates.

Authors:  Hui-Lin Huang; Hsin-Yau Lin; Pei-Shan Chen; Jey-Jau Lee; Jennifer Kung; Sue-Lein Wang
Journal:  Dalton Trans       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 4.390

4.  Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C Struct Chem       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 1.172

5.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20

6.  The Cambridge Structural Database.

Authors:  Colin R Groom; Ian J Bruno; Matthew P Lightfoot; Suzanna C Ward
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B Struct Sci Cryst Eng Mater       Date:  2016-04-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.