Literature DB >> 28529788

The 1:1 co-crystal of 2-bromo-naphthalene-1,4-dione and 1,8-di-hydroxy-anthracene-9,10-dione: crystal structure and Hirshfeld surface analysis.

Marlon D L Tonin1, Simon J Garden1, Mukesh M Jotani2, Solange M S V Wardell3, James L Wardell4,5, Edward R T Tiekink6.   

Abstract

The asymmetric unit of the title co-crystal, C10H5BrO2·C14H8O4 [systematic name: 2-bromo-1,4-di-hydro-naphthalene-1,4-dione-1,8-dihy-droxy-9,10-di-hydro-anthracene-9,10-dione (1/1)], features one mol-ecule of each coformer. The 2-bromo-naphtho-quinone mol-ecule is almost planar [r.m.s deviation of the 13 non-H atoms = 0.060 Å, with the maximum deviations of 0.093 (1) and 0.099 (1) Å being for the Br atom and a carbonyl-O atom, respectively]. The 1,8-di-hydroxy-anthra-quinone mol-ecule is planar (r.m.s. deviation for the 18 non-H atoms is 0.022 Å) and features two intra-molecular hy-droxy-O-H⋯O(carbon-yl) hydrogen bonds. Dimeric aggregates of 1,8-di-hydroxy-anthra-quinone mol-ecules assemble through weak inter-molecular hy-droxy-O-H⋯O(carbon-yl) hydrogen bonds. The mol-ecular packing comprises stacks of mol-ecules of 2-bromo-naphtho-quinone and dimeric assembles of 1,8-di-hydroxy-anthra-quinone with the shortest π-π contact within a stack of 3.5760 (9) Å occurring between the different rings of 2-bromo-naphtho-quinone mol-ecules. The analysis of the Hirshfeld surface reveals the importance of the inter-actions just indicated but, also the contribution of additional C-H⋯O contacts as well as C=O⋯π inter-actions to the mol-ecular packing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hirshfeld surface analysis; co-crystal; crystal structure; di­hydroxy­anthracene-9,10-dione; naphthalene-1,4-dione

Year:  2017        PMID: 28529788      PMCID: PMC5418796          DOI: 10.1107/S2056989017005667

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun


Chemical context

The formation of co-crystals is one of the major activities of crystal engineering endeavours and is motivated by various considerations. The concept of non-covalent derivatization of active pharmaceutical ingredients (API’s) by this technology, in the hope of producing new formulations with improved bio-availability, etc. is a prominent motivation for investigation (Duggirala et al., 2016 ▸; Bolla & Nangia, 2016 ▸). Over and above this are applications ranging from enhancing non-linear optical materials, crystallization of materials that normally do not crystallize, optical resolution, etc. (Aakeröy, 2015 ▸). The above notwithstanding, the title co-crystal, (I), was isolated serendipiously during attempts to react 2-bromo­naphtho­quinone with 1,8-di­hydroxy­anthra­quinone. Subsequently, it was shown that an equimolar ethyl acetate (or ethanol) solution of 2-bromo­naphtho­quinone and 1,8-di­hydroxy­anthra­quinone could be co-crystallized to give the same product. Herein, the crystal and mol­ecular structures of (I) are described along with a detailed analysis of the supra­molecular association by means of an analysis of the Hirshfeld surfaces.

Structural commentary

The mol­ecular structures of the constituents of (I) are shown in Fig. 1 ▸, the asymmetric unit comprising one mol­ecule each of 2-bromo­naphtho­quinone, Fig. 1 ▸ a, and 1,8-di­hydroxy­anthra­quinone, Fig. 1 ▸ b. The six carbon atoms comprising the cyclo­hexa-2,5-diene-1,4-dione ring of the naphtho­quinone mol­ecule are not strictly planar with the r.m.s. deviation being 0.030 Å; the maximum deviations are 0.025 (1) and −0.031 (2) Å for the C4a and C4 atoms, respectively. The appended Br1, O1 and O4 atoms lie, respectively, 0.077 (1), 0.078 (1) and −0.117 (1) Å out of the plane with the Br1 atom lying to one side of the ring and the carbonyl-O atoms to the other. Overall, the r.m.s. deviation for the best plane defined by the 13 non-H atoms comprising the naphtho­quinone mol­ecule is 0.060 Å, with the maximum deviations being 0.093 (1) Å for atom Br1 and −0.099 (1) Å for the O4 atom, again with these atoms lying to opposite sides of the plane. With respect to the anthra­quinone mol­ecule, the r.m.s. deviation for the 18 non-H atoms is 0.022 Å with the maximum deviations being 0.039 (2) Å for C(13) and 0.026 (1) Å for the C19 and C23 atoms. As seen from Fig. 1 ▸ b, the hy­droxy-H atoms are orientated to be proximate to the centrally located carbonyl-O atom to form intra­molecular hy­droxy-O—H⋯O(carbon­yl) hydrogen-bonds, Table 1 ▸.
Figure 1

The mol­ecular structures of (a) 2-bromo­naphtho­quinone and (b) 1,8-di­hydroxy­anthra­quinone, i.e. the coformers comprising the asymmetric unit of (I), showing the atom-labelling scheme and displacement ellipsoids at the 70% probability level.

Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O11—H11O⋯O190.83 (2)1.81 (2)2.5766 (16)153 (2)
O18—H18O⋯O190.83 (2)1.89 (2)2.6097 (16)144 (2)
O11—H11O⋯O19i 0.83 (2)2.40 (2)2.8730 (16)117 (2)
O18—H18O⋯O11i 0.83 (2)2.35 (2)2.9677 (17)131 (2)
C3—H3⋯O20ii 0.952.253.1657 (18)161
C13—H13⋯O1iii 0.952.463.348 (2)156
C15—H15⋯O4iv 0.952.563.4358 (18)153
C17—H17⋯O4v 0.952.433.228 (2)141

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) ; (iv) ; (v) .

Supra­molecular features

In addition to the intra­molecular hy­droxy-O—H⋯O(carbon­yl) hydrogen-bonds in the anthra­quinone mol­ecule, both hy­droxy-H atoms from weaker inter­molecular hydrogen-bonds with a centrosymmetrically related mol­ecule indicating each hy­droxy-H atom is bifurcated, Table 1 ▸. The resulting dimeric aggregate, Fig. 2 ▸ a, is connected by a centrosymmetric planar, eight-membered {⋯HO⋯O⋯H}2 synthon which incorporates two transannular hy­droxy-O—H⋯O(carbon­yl) hydrogen bonds. The dimeric aggregates stack along the b axis being surrounded by two columns of similar dimeric aggregates and six columns comprising naphtho­quinone mol­ecules, Fig. 2 ▸ b. Connections between columns, leading to a three-dimensional architecture, are of the type sp 2-C—H⋯O(carbon­yl) and involve all the remaining carbonyl-O atoms with the O atom of the naphtho­quinone-C4=O4 moiety forming two such contacts, Table 1 ▸. Within columns comprising mol­ecules of naphtho­quinone, π–π stacking inter­actions are noted, i.e. between the (C1–C4,C4a,C8a) and (C4a,C5–C8,C8a) rings with the inter-centroid separation being 3.5760 (9) Å and the angle of inclination being 1.64 (7)° for symmetry operation x, −1 + y, z. The closest comparable inter­action within the stack of anthra­quinone mol­ecules is 4.1013 (9) Å, i.e. between (C15C21) and (C19–C24) rings; angle of inclination = 0.65 (7)° for symmetry operation: x, −1 + y, z.
Figure 2

The mol­ecular packing in (I): (a) dimeric aggregate comprising centrosymmetrically related 1,8-di­hydroxy­anthra­quinone mol­ecules connected by hy­droxy-O—H⋯O(carbon­yl) hydrogen bonds and (b) a view of the unit-cell contents in projection down the b axis. The O—H⋯O and phenyl-C—H⋯O(carbon­yl) inter­actions are shown as orange and blue dashed lines, respectively.

Hirshfeld surface analysis

The Hirshfeld surface analysis of title 1:1 co-crystal, (I), was performed as per recent publications on co-crystals (Syed, Jotani, Halim et al., 2016 ▸; Syed, Halim, Jotani et al., 2016 ▸) and provides more detailed information on the supra­molecular association formed by the individual coformers and overall packing in the crystal. The Hishfeld surfaces are mapped over d norm, Figs. 3 ▸ and 4 ▸, the calculated electrostatic potential, Figs. 5 ▸ and 6 ▸, and shape-index, Figs. 7 ▸ and 8 ▸.
Figure 3

Two views of the Hirshfeld surface for the anthra­quinone mol­ecule in (I) mapped over d norm over the range −0.120 to 1.190 au.

Figure 4

Two views of the Hirshfeld surface for the naphtho­quinone mol­ecule in (I) mapped over d norm over the range −0.125 to 1.157 au.

Figure 5

Views of the Hirshfeld surfaces for the (a) anthra­quinone and (b) naphtho­quinone mol­ecules in (I) mapped over the electrostatic potential in the range ±0.059 au. The red and blue regions represent negative and positive electrostatic potentials, respectively.

Figure 6

Views of Hirshfeld surfaces for the mol­ecules in (I) mapped over the electrostatic potential highlighting (a) short inter­atomic C⋯C contacts as with white dashed lines in the stacking of anthra­quinone mol­ecules in the range ±0.059 au and (b) short inter­atomic C⋯O/O⋯C contacts as black dashed lines between approximately co-planar anthra­quinone and naphtho­quinone mol­ecules in the range ±0.060 au.

Figure 7

Views of Hirshfeld surface for a reference anthra­quinone mol­ecule in (I) mapped over the shape-index property highlighting: (a) O—H⋯O and C—H⋯O inter­actions as black dashed lines and (b) C—O⋯ π and reciprocal π⋯O—C inter­actions as blue and white dotted lines, respectively.

Figure 8

Views of Hirshfeld surface for a reference naphtho­quinone mol­ecule in (I) mapped over the shape-index property highlighting: (a) C—H⋯O inter­actions as black dashed lines and (b) π–π stacking inter­action as red dotted lines.

The donors and acceptors of inter­molecular hy­droxy-O—H⋯O(carbon­yl) hydrogen-bonds between anthra­quinone mol­ecules are viewed as bright-red spots labelled with ‘1’ and ‘2’ on the Hirshfeld surfaces mapped over d norm in Fig. 3 ▸ a. On the Hirshfeld surface mapped over the calculated electrostatic potential, the respective donors and acceptors appear as the blue (positive potential) and red regions (negative potential) in Fig. 5 ▸ a. The presence of faint-red spots near carbon atoms C11, C19, Fig. 3 ▸ a, and near the atoms C15 and C20, Fig. 3 ▸ b, also indicate the links between mol­ecules through short inter-atomic CC contacts, Table 2 ▸. These short contacts are also illustrated by white dashed lines in Fig. 6 ▸ a. Links between the coformers involving their carbonyl-C4=O4 and C20=O20 groups through short inter­atomic C⋯O/O⋯C contacts, Table 2 ▸, are viewed as a pair of bright- and faint-red spots near these atoms in Fig. 3 ▸ b and 4b. This is also illustrated by the black dashed lines on the Hirshfeld surface mapped over electrostatic potential in Fig. 6 ▸ b. The donors and acceptors of inter­molecular C—H⋯O(carbon­yl) inter­actions can be viewed as bright-red spots having labels ‘3’–‘5’ in Figs. 3 ▸ and 4 ▸, and as blue and red regions, respectively, in Fig. 5 ▸. The comparatively weak anthra­quinone-C15—H⋯O4 hydrogen bond is represented with faint-red spots near these atoms in Fig. 3 ▸ b and 4a, labelled with ‘6’. The immediate environments about reference anthra­quinone and naphtho­quinone mol­ecules within shape-index-mapped Hirshfeld surfaces highlighting inter­molecular O—H⋯O, C—H⋯O, π–π stacking and C—O⋯π inter­actions influential on the packing are illustrated in Figs. 7 ▸ and 8 ▸.
Table 2

Summary of short inter-atomic contacts (Å) in (I)

Contactdistancesymmetry operation
C11⋯C203.299 (2) x, −1 + y, z
C15⋯C193.347 (2) x, 1 + y, z
C4⋯O203.0273 (18) x, y, z
C20⋯O43.1585 (18) x, y, z
O18⋯H52.601 − x, − + y,  − z
C16⋯H162.891 − x, − + y,  − z
H8⋯H82.27-x, 2 − y, −z
The two-dimensional fingerprint plots for the individual naphtho­quinone and anthra­quinone mol­ecules, and for the overall co-crystal are illustrated in Fig. 9 ▸ a. The plots delineated into H⋯H, O⋯H/H⋯O, C⋯H/H⋯C, CC and C⋯O/O⋯C contacts (McKinnon et al., 2007 ▸) are shown in Fig. 9 ▸ b–f, respectively; the relative contributions from various contacts to the Hirshfeld surfaces are qu­anti­tatively summarized in Table 3 ▸. The different immediate environments of inter­molecular inter­actions around the naphtho­quinone and anthra­quinone coformers result in different shapes and a distinct distribution of points in the respective delineated fingerprint plots: there is a clear distinction between these and those for the overall co-crystal.
Figure 9

(a) The full two-dimensional fingerprint plots for the individual naphtho­quinone and anthra­quinone mol­ecules and the overall co-crystal (I), and fingerprint plots delineated into (b) H⋯H, (c) O⋯H/H⋯O, (d) C⋯H/H⋯C, (e) C⋯C and (f) C⋯O/O⋯C contacts.

Table 3

Percentage contribution of inter-atomic contacts to the Hirshfeld surface for (I)

Contactpercentage contribution  
 naphtho­quinoneanthra­quinone(I)
H⋯H20.521.420.6
O⋯H/H⋯O29.228.431.3
C⋯H/H⋯C15.225.220.2
C⋯C9.77.19.3
C⋯O/O⋯C3.911.95.4
Br⋯H/H⋯Br10.04.16.5
Br⋯Br4.60.02.4
Br⋯C/C⋯Br5.20.02.8
Br⋯O/O⋯Br1.10.10.7
O⋯O0.51.80.8
The fingerprint plots delineated into H⋯H contacts arise from relatively low percentage contributions to their respective Hirshfeld surfaces, Table 3 ▸, as a result of their relatively their low contents in the mol­ecules and the involvement of many hydrogen atoms in specific inter­molecular inter­actions. The presence of short inter­atomic H⋯H contacts between naphtho­quinone-H8 atoms, Table 2 ▸, is evident in the respective plot as a single peak at d e + d i ∼ 2.2 Å. The donors and acceptors of the naphtho­quinone-H3 and anthra­quinone-O20(carbon­yl) atoms are viewed as a thin, long spike at d e + d i ∼ 2.2 Å in each of the fingerprint plots of O⋯H/H⋯O contacts, Fig. 9 ▸ c; the spikes for the donor and acceptor inter­actions are viewed separately in the plots for the naphtho­quinone and anthra­quinone coformers, respectively. The O—H⋯O inter­actions instrumental in linking anthra­quinone mol­ecules are evident in the respective O⋯H/H⋯O delineated plot, Fig. 9 ▸ c, and is characterized by a pair of short spikes at d e + d i ∼ 2.3 Å where in the acceptor spike is merged within the plot of the aforementioned C3—H⋯Oii inter­action. The other inter­molecular C—H⋯O contacts involving anthra­quinone-H13 and -H17, and naphtho­quinone-O1 and -O4(carbon­yl) atoms are viewed as a pair of short spikes at d e + d i ∼ 2.4 Å in the donor and acceptor regions of their respective plots in Fig. 9 ▸ c. The points corresponding to anthra­quinone-C15—H15⋯O4(carbon­yl) inter­actions and other short inter­atomic O⋯H contacts, Table 2 ▸, are merged within the plots. A pair of short peaks at d e + d i < 2.9 Å, i.e. less than sum of their van der Waals radii, in the fingerprint plot delineated into C⋯H/H⋯C contacts for anthra­quinone, Fig. 9 ▸ d, are indicative of short inter­atomic C⋯H contacts, Table 2 ▸, in the crystal. The remaining inter­atomic C⋯H/H⋯C contacts in the crystal are beyond van der Waals separations but still make notable contributions to the Hirshfeld surfaces. The 9.7% contribution from CC contacts to the Hirshfeld surface of the naphtho­quinone coformer is the result of π–π stacking inter­action between its symmetry related (C1–C4,C4a,C8a) and (C4a,C5–C8,C8a) rings and is highlighted as the parabolic distribution of points in Fig. 9 ▸ e, having high density at around d e = d i ∼ 1.8 Å. The parabolic distribution of points with the peak at d e = d i ∼ 1.6 Å in the plot for the anthra­quinone coformer, Fig. 9 ▸ e, indicates links between these mol­ecules through short inter­atomic CC contacts along the b axis. The presence of CC contacts in (I) results in an overall 9.3% contribution to the Hirshfeld surface. The 3.9% contribution from C⋯O/O⋯C contacts to the Hirshfeld surface for the naphtho­quinone mol­ecule, Fig. 9 ▸ f, results from short, inter-atomic C⋯O/O⋯C contacts whereas the 11.9% contribution from C⋯O/O⋯C contacts for the anthra­quinone mol­ecule has a contribution from C=O⋯π inter­actions involving carbony-O19 and -O20 atoms and (C11–C14,C24,C23) and (C15C18, C22, C21) rings, Table 4 ▸. Most of these features disappear in the overall fingerprint plot delineated into these contacts with only features due to the C=O⋯π inter­actions remaining, Fig. 9 ▸ f.
Table 4

Summary of C=O⋯π contacts (Å, °) in (I)

Cg1 and Cg2 are the centroids of the C11–C14/C24/C23 and C15–C18/C22/C21 rings, respectively.

Y X Cg XCg YXCg YCg symmetry operation
C20O20 Cg13.2667 (12)85.61 (8)3.3999 (16) x, 1 + y, z
C19O19 Cg23.3191 (12)85.51 (8)3.4551 (16) x, −1 + y, z
Although the naphtho­quinone-bromide substituent makes a notable contribution to the Hirshfeld surface, Table 3 ▸, it does not form inter-atomic contacts with other atoms less than sum of the respective van der Waals radii. Therefore, it exerts no significant influence on the packing. The small contribution from O⋯O contacts also has a negligible effect on the packing.

Database survey

The coformers comprising (I) are relatively unexplored in the crystallographic literature (Groom et al., 2016 ▸). For example, the structure of 2-bromo­naphtho­quinone has only been reported on one previous occasion, namely in its pure form (Gaultier & Hauw, 1965 ▸). This structure presents the same features as the mol­ecule in (I) with the r.m.s deviation of the 13 fitted atoms being 0.059 Å, cf. 0.060 Å in (I). More attention has been directed towards 1,8-di­hydroxy­anthra­quinone. The structure of the pure mol­ecule was originally reported in 1965 (Prakash, 1965 ▸) and a recent study focussed upon the several polymorphic forms of this compound (Rohl et al., 2008 ▸). In all known forms of 1,8-di­hydroxy­anthra­quinone, an essentially planar mol­ecule is observed along with the two intra­molecular hy­droxy-O—H⋯O(carbon­yl) hydrogen-bonds persisting as in (I). A co-crystal of 1,8-di­hydroxy­anthra­quinone is also known, i.e. a 3:1 co-crystal with acetic acid (Cheuk et al., 2015 ▸). This structure is particularly notable in that there are six independent 1,8-di­hydroxy­anthra­quinone mol­ecules in the asymmetric unit, each with the same conformation as in the parent compound and in (I), along with two independent acetic acid mol­ecules.

Synthesis and crystallization

Compound (I) was isolated during attempts to chemically bond 2-bromo­naphtho­quinone and 1,8-di­hydroxy­anthra­quinone under basic conditions. Upon work up of the reaction mixture, the crude material was obtained after evaporation of all the volatiles. This was filtered through a short column of silica gel eluting with CH2Cl2/hexane (1:1 v/v) and a single, yellow fraction was collected. After evaporation of the solvent under reduced pressure, a yellow solid was obtained. This was recrystallized from ethyl acetate solution to give small orange–red crystals with yields of 78–85% based upon the qu­antity of 1,8-di­hydroxy­anthra­quinone initially used. Notably, the substrates 2-bromo­naphtho­quinone and 1,8-di­hydroxy­anthra­quinone could not be chromatographically distinguished as they ran with equivalent R f’s in a wide range of solvents and solvent mixtures. NMR spectra (1H and 13C) were consistent with a one to one mixture of the same components as there was no deviation of chemical shifts in comparison to the spectra of the individual components. A sample of the co-crystal material had a well defined melting point of 413–414 K, which is inter­mediate between the melting points of the pure components 2-bromo­naphtho­quinone, 405–406 K (Brimble et al., 2007 ▸) and 1,8-di­hydroxy­anthra­quinone, 465–466 K (Cameron et al., 1982 ▸).

Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 5 ▸. Carbon-bound H atoms were placed in calculated positions (C—H = 0.95 Å) and were included in the refinement in the riding-model approximation, with U iso(H) set to 1.2U eq(C). The O-bound H atoms were located from a difference map but refined with O—H = 0.84±0.01 Å and U iso(H) = 1.5U eq(O).
Table 5

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC10H5BrO2·C14H8O4
M r 477.25
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K)100
a, b, c (Å)17.55090 (12), 4.85939 (3), 22.83423 (16)
β (°)106.7429 (7)
V3)1864.90 (2)
Z 4
Radiation typeCu Kα
μ (mm−1)3.39
Crystal size (mm)0.42 × 0.05 × 0.03
 
Data collection
DiffractometerRigaku Saturn724+ (2x2 bin mode)
Absorption correctionMulti-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Rigaku Oxford Diffraction, 2015)
T min, T max 0.697, 1.000
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections27708, 3507, 3489
R int 0.021
(sin θ/λ)max−1)0.610
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.025, 0.075, 1.02
No. of reflections3507
No. of parameters286
No. of restraints2
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3)0.39, −0.32

Computer programs: CrysAlis PRO (Rigaku Oxford Diffraction, 2015 ▸), SHELXS (Sheldrick, 2008 ▸), SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015 ▸), ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 2012 ▸), DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2006 ▸) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010 ▸).

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989017005667/wm5383sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989017005667/wm5383Isup2.hkl Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989017005667/wm5383Isup3.cml CCDC reference: 1543933 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C10H5BrO2·C14H8O4F(000) = 960
Mr = 477.25Dx = 1.700 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cCu Kα radiation, λ = 1.54184 Å
a = 17.55090 (12) ÅCell parameters from 22842 reflections
b = 4.85939 (3) Åθ = 2.6–69.9°
c = 22.83423 (16) ŵ = 3.39 mm1
β = 106.7429 (7)°T = 100 K
V = 1864.90 (2) Å3Plate, orange
Z = 40.42 × 0.05 × 0.03 mm
Rigaku Saturn724+ (2x2 bin mode) diffractometer3507 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed X-ray tube, Enhance (Cu) X-ray Source3489 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.021
ω scansθmax = 70.2°, θmin = 2.6°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Rigaku Oxford Diffraction, 2015)h = −21→21
Tmin = 0.697, Tmax = 1.000k = −5→4
27708 measured reflectionsl = −27→27
Refinement on F22 restraints
Least-squares matrix: fullH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.025w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0507P)2 + 1.0878P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.075(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
S = 1.02Δρmax = 0.39 e Å3
3507 reflectionsΔρmin = −0.32 e Å3
286 parameters
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Br10.03352 (2)0.06602 (3)0.19884 (2)0.02850 (9)
O1−0.00432 (7)0.4511 (2)0.08868 (6)0.0283 (3)
O40.30880 (7)0.4406 (2)0.20139 (5)0.0240 (3)
C10.06668 (9)0.4618 (3)0.11528 (7)0.0212 (3)
C20.10318 (9)0.2887 (3)0.17016 (7)0.0212 (3)
C30.18140 (9)0.2861 (3)0.19828 (7)0.0220 (3)
H30.20150.17020.23280.026*
C40.23713 (9)0.4592 (3)0.17689 (7)0.0193 (3)
C4A0.20374 (8)0.6514 (3)0.12522 (6)0.0189 (3)
C50.25340 (9)0.8282 (3)0.10564 (7)0.0221 (3)
H50.30890.82990.12590.027*
C60.22192 (10)1.0033 (4)0.05623 (7)0.0255 (3)
H60.25581.12590.04310.031*
C70.14060 (11)0.9984 (4)0.02611 (8)0.0271 (3)
H70.11921.1172−0.00770.032*
C80.09098 (9)0.8207 (3)0.04535 (7)0.0248 (3)
H80.03570.81710.02440.030*
C8A0.12158 (9)0.6468 (3)0.09523 (7)0.0198 (3)
O110.36741 (7)−0.0561 (2)0.48553 (5)0.0244 (3)
H11O0.4113 (8)0.004 (5)0.4841 (10)0.037*
O180.58338 (6)0.5207 (3)0.42739 (5)0.0245 (2)
H18O0.5660 (13)0.396 (4)0.4450 (9)0.037*
O190.47299 (6)0.2395 (2)0.45660 (5)0.0217 (2)
O200.24399 (6)0.7932 (2)0.29021 (5)0.0261 (2)
C110.31370 (9)0.0927 (3)0.44373 (7)0.0199 (3)
C120.23328 (10)0.0292 (3)0.43377 (7)0.0229 (3)
H120.2184−0.11230.45700.027*
C130.17525 (9)0.1711 (4)0.39025 (7)0.0251 (3)
H130.12080.12530.38370.030*
C140.19585 (9)0.3800 (4)0.35607 (7)0.0234 (3)
H140.15560.47710.32650.028*
C150.40221 (10)0.9337 (3)0.30130 (7)0.0230 (3)
H150.36191.02990.27160.028*
C160.48208 (11)0.9953 (4)0.30923 (7)0.0251 (3)
H160.49601.13500.28510.030*
C170.54127 (9)0.8551 (3)0.35188 (7)0.0236 (3)
H170.59550.89900.35680.028*
C180.52207 (9)0.6495 (3)0.38783 (7)0.0206 (3)
C190.41987 (9)0.3695 (3)0.41798 (6)0.0183 (3)
C200.29639 (9)0.6680 (3)0.32790 (6)0.0200 (3)
C210.38191 (9)0.7318 (3)0.33688 (7)0.0197 (3)
C220.44137 (9)0.5846 (3)0.38098 (7)0.0179 (3)
C230.33587 (8)0.3038 (3)0.40931 (6)0.0180 (3)
C240.27558 (9)0.4463 (3)0.36537 (7)0.0193 (3)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Br10.02564 (12)0.02819 (13)0.03685 (13)−0.00434 (6)0.01723 (9)−0.00040 (6)
O10.0168 (5)0.0350 (7)0.0321 (6)0.0009 (4)0.0054 (5)−0.0024 (5)
O40.0182 (5)0.0298 (7)0.0237 (5)0.0035 (4)0.0055 (4)0.0024 (4)
C10.0180 (7)0.0225 (8)0.0239 (7)0.0026 (6)0.0072 (6)−0.0046 (6)
C20.0216 (7)0.0202 (7)0.0250 (7)−0.0003 (6)0.0118 (6)−0.0018 (6)
C30.0239 (7)0.0212 (7)0.0220 (7)0.0032 (6)0.0085 (6)0.0019 (6)
C40.0194 (7)0.0199 (8)0.0194 (7)0.0020 (6)0.0070 (6)−0.0017 (5)
C4A0.0179 (7)0.0195 (7)0.0201 (7)0.0035 (6)0.0066 (5)−0.0010 (6)
C50.0211 (7)0.0226 (8)0.0242 (7)0.0031 (6)0.0091 (6)−0.0004 (6)
C60.0303 (9)0.0227 (7)0.0277 (8)0.0036 (7)0.0151 (7)0.0023 (7)
C70.0327 (9)0.0261 (8)0.0242 (8)0.0094 (7)0.0111 (7)0.0046 (7)
C80.0233 (7)0.0269 (8)0.0229 (7)0.0067 (6)0.0049 (6)0.0016 (6)
C8A0.0180 (7)0.0205 (7)0.0212 (7)0.0038 (6)0.0064 (5)−0.0019 (6)
O110.0228 (6)0.0244 (6)0.0265 (6)−0.0019 (4)0.0077 (5)0.0069 (4)
O180.0180 (5)0.0250 (6)0.0315 (6)−0.0010 (5)0.0086 (4)0.0047 (5)
O190.0182 (5)0.0232 (5)0.0233 (5)0.0006 (4)0.0052 (4)0.0045 (4)
O200.0241 (5)0.0279 (6)0.0257 (5)0.0058 (5)0.0061 (4)0.0049 (5)
C110.0211 (8)0.0196 (7)0.0193 (7)−0.0003 (6)0.0064 (6)−0.0039 (5)
C120.0241 (8)0.0239 (8)0.0241 (7)−0.0051 (6)0.0125 (6)−0.0023 (6)
C130.0186 (7)0.0298 (9)0.0294 (8)−0.0038 (6)0.0109 (6)−0.0055 (7)
C140.0190 (7)0.0272 (8)0.0235 (7)0.0019 (6)0.0053 (6)−0.0030 (6)
C150.0293 (8)0.0195 (8)0.0220 (7)0.0024 (6)0.0100 (6)0.0006 (5)
C160.0352 (8)0.0202 (7)0.0253 (8)−0.0024 (7)0.0172 (7)0.0009 (7)
C170.0233 (7)0.0238 (8)0.0280 (8)−0.0037 (6)0.0144 (6)−0.0035 (7)
C180.0210 (7)0.0195 (7)0.0228 (7)−0.0002 (6)0.0088 (6)−0.0039 (6)
C190.0196 (7)0.0176 (7)0.0185 (7)0.0002 (6)0.0066 (5)−0.0032 (6)
C200.0226 (7)0.0196 (7)0.0184 (7)0.0021 (6)0.0068 (6)−0.0016 (6)
C210.0225 (7)0.0184 (7)0.0197 (7)0.0006 (6)0.0085 (5)−0.0019 (6)
C220.0194 (7)0.0172 (7)0.0190 (7)−0.0005 (5)0.0083 (6)−0.0022 (5)
C230.0185 (7)0.0179 (7)0.0187 (6)−0.0006 (6)0.0072 (5)−0.0020 (5)
C240.0196 (7)0.0201 (8)0.0195 (7)0.0004 (5)0.0074 (6)−0.0026 (5)
Br1—C21.8857 (15)O20—C201.2248 (18)
O1—C11.220 (2)C11—C121.398 (2)
O4—C41.2239 (19)C11—C231.413 (2)
C1—C8A1.483 (2)C12—C131.385 (2)
C1—C21.492 (2)C12—H120.9500
C2—C31.338 (2)C13—C141.390 (2)
C3—C41.476 (2)C13—H130.9500
C3—H30.9500C14—C241.391 (2)
C4—C4A1.486 (2)C14—H140.9500
C4A—C51.386 (2)C15—C211.384 (2)
C4A—C8A1.407 (2)C15—C161.393 (2)
C5—C61.394 (2)C15—H150.9500
C5—H50.9500C16—C171.382 (2)
C6—C71.395 (2)C16—H160.9500
C6—H60.9500C17—C181.395 (2)
C7—C81.385 (3)C17—H170.9500
C7—H70.9500C18—C221.415 (2)
C8—C8A1.395 (2)C19—C221.460 (2)
C8—H80.9500C19—C231.465 (2)
O11—C111.3433 (19)C20—C241.485 (2)
O11—H11O0.833 (10)C20—C211.488 (2)
O18—C181.3436 (19)C21—C221.417 (2)
O18—H18O0.831 (10)C23—C241.412 (2)
O19—C191.2541 (18)
O1—C1—C8A122.25 (15)C11—C12—H12119.8
O1—C1—C2121.59 (15)C12—C13—C14120.66 (14)
C8A—C1—C2116.16 (13)C12—C13—H13119.7
C3—C2—C1122.79 (14)C14—C13—H13119.7
C3—C2—Br1120.42 (12)C24—C14—C13119.74 (14)
C1—C2—Br1116.79 (11)C24—C14—H14120.1
C2—C3—C4121.47 (14)C13—C14—H14120.1
C2—C3—H3119.3C21—C15—C16119.69 (15)
C4—C3—H3119.3C21—C15—H15120.2
O4—C4—C3119.89 (14)C16—C15—H15120.2
O4—C4—C4A121.84 (14)C17—C16—C15120.65 (15)
C3—C4—C4A118.26 (13)C17—C16—H16119.7
C5—C4A—C8A120.29 (14)C15—C16—H16119.7
C5—C4A—C4120.30 (13)C16—C17—C18120.53 (15)
C8A—C4A—C4119.38 (14)C16—C17—H17119.7
C4A—C5—C6119.99 (14)C18—C17—H17119.7
C4A—C5—H5120.0O18—C18—C17116.53 (14)
C6—C5—H5120.0O18—C18—C22123.57 (14)
C7—C6—C5119.96 (16)C17—C18—C22119.90 (14)
C7—C6—H6120.0O19—C19—C22120.26 (13)
C5—C6—H6120.0O19—C19—C23120.02 (14)
C8—C7—C6120.14 (15)C22—C19—C23119.71 (13)
C8—C7—H7119.9O20—C20—C24120.36 (14)
C6—C7—H7119.9O20—C20—C21121.12 (14)
C7—C8—C8A120.47 (15)C24—C20—C21118.52 (13)
C7—C8—H8119.8C15—C21—C22120.88 (14)
C8A—C8—H8119.8C15—C21—C20119.13 (14)
C8—C8A—C4A119.15 (15)C22—C21—C20119.99 (14)
C8—C8A—C1119.16 (14)C18—C22—C21118.35 (14)
C4A—C8A—C1121.69 (14)C18—C22—C19120.85 (14)
C11—O11—H11O104.5 (16)C21—C22—C19120.80 (14)
C18—O18—H18O109.2 (16)C24—C23—C11118.74 (13)
O11—C11—C12117.75 (14)C24—C23—C19120.53 (13)
O11—C11—C23122.46 (14)C11—C23—C19120.71 (13)
C12—C11—C23119.78 (14)C14—C24—C23120.66 (14)
C13—C12—C11120.41 (15)C14—C24—C20118.90 (14)
C13—C12—H12119.8C23—C24—C20120.44 (13)
O1—C1—C2—C3176.47 (15)C16—C15—C21—C20−179.96 (14)
C8A—C1—C2—C3−3.6 (2)O20—C20—C21—C15−0.9 (2)
O1—C1—C2—Br1−3.0 (2)C24—C20—C21—C15178.56 (13)
C8A—C1—C2—Br1176.89 (11)O20—C20—C21—C22179.75 (14)
C1—C2—C3—C40.7 (2)C24—C20—C21—C22−0.8 (2)
Br1—C2—C3—C4−179.76 (11)O18—C18—C22—C21−178.89 (14)
C2—C3—C4—O4−175.82 (15)C17—C18—C22—C210.4 (2)
C2—C3—C4—C4A3.7 (2)O18—C18—C22—C190.5 (2)
O4—C4—C4A—C5−3.8 (2)C17—C18—C22—C19179.80 (14)
C3—C4—C4A—C5176.67 (14)C15—C21—C22—C180.1 (2)
O4—C4—C4A—C8A174.35 (14)C20—C21—C22—C18179.47 (13)
C3—C4—C4A—C8A−5.2 (2)C15—C21—C22—C19−179.30 (14)
C8A—C4A—C5—C60.3 (2)C20—C21—C22—C190.1 (2)
C4—C4A—C5—C6178.50 (14)O19—C19—C22—C180.2 (2)
C4A—C5—C6—C7−0.7 (2)C23—C19—C22—C18−179.10 (13)
C5—C6—C7—C80.3 (3)O19—C19—C22—C21179.56 (13)
C6—C7—C8—C8A0.5 (3)C23—C19—C22—C210.3 (2)
C7—C8—C8A—C4A−0.9 (2)O11—C11—C23—C24178.68 (13)
C7—C8—C8A—C1179.08 (15)C12—C11—C23—C240.0 (2)
C5—C4A—C8A—C80.5 (2)O11—C11—C23—C190.1 (2)
C4—C4A—C8A—C8−177.71 (14)C12—C11—C23—C19−178.57 (14)
C5—C4A—C8A—C1−179.51 (14)O19—C19—C23—C24−179.12 (13)
C4—C4A—C8A—C12.3 (2)C22—C19—C23—C240.2 (2)
O1—C1—C8A—C81.9 (2)O19—C19—C23—C11−0.6 (2)
C2—C1—C8A—C8−178.02 (14)C22—C19—C23—C11178.72 (13)
O1—C1—C8A—C4A−178.11 (15)C13—C14—C24—C23−0.1 (2)
C2—C1—C8A—C4A2.0 (2)C13—C14—C24—C20179.34 (14)
O11—C11—C12—C13−178.50 (14)C11—C23—C24—C14−0.1 (2)
C23—C11—C12—C130.2 (2)C19—C23—C24—C14178.52 (14)
C11—C12—C13—C14−0.4 (2)C11—C23—C24—C20−179.52 (13)
C12—C13—C14—C240.4 (2)C19—C23—C24—C20−0.9 (2)
C21—C15—C16—C170.6 (2)O20—C20—C24—C141.2 (2)
C15—C16—C17—C18−0.1 (2)C21—C20—C24—C14−178.20 (13)
C16—C17—C18—O18178.93 (14)O20—C20—C24—C23−179.31 (14)
C16—C17—C18—C22−0.4 (2)C21—C20—C24—C231.3 (2)
C16—C15—C21—C22−0.6 (2)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O11—H11O···O190.83 (2)1.81 (2)2.5766 (16)153 (2)
O18—H18O···O190.83 (2)1.89 (2)2.6097 (16)144 (2)
O11—H11O···O19i0.83 (2)2.40 (2)2.8730 (16)117 (2)
O18—H18O···O11i0.83 (2)2.35 (2)2.9677 (17)131 (2)
C3—H3···O20ii0.952.253.1657 (18)161
C13—H13···O1iii0.952.463.348 (2)156
C15—H15···O4iv0.952.563.4358 (18)153
C17—H17···O4v0.952.433.228 (2)141
  7 in total

1.  Pharmaceutical cocrystals: along the path to improved medicines.

Authors:  Naga K Duggirala; Miranda L Perry; Örn Almarsson; Michael J Zaworotko
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 6.222

2.  Towards quantitative analysis of intermolecular interactions with Hirshfeld surfaces.

Authors:  Joshua J McKinnon; Dylan Jayatilaka; Mark A Spackman
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2007-10-07       Impact factor: 6.222

3.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

4.  Is there any point in making co-crystals?

Authors:  Christer Aakeröy
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B Struct Sci Cryst Eng Mater       Date:  2015-07-14

Review 5.  Pharmaceutical cocrystals: walking the talk.

Authors:  Geetha Bolla; Ashwini Nangia
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 6.222

6.  Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C Struct Chem       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 1.172

7.  The Cambridge Structural Database.

Authors:  Colin R Groom; Ian J Bruno; Matthew P Lightfoot; Suzanna C Ward
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B Struct Sci Cryst Eng Mater       Date:  2016-04-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.