| Literature DB >> 28529761 |
Jinghai Yin1, Jianfeng Hu1, Zhendong Mu1.
Abstract
The rapid development of driver fatigue detection technology indicates important significance of traffic safety. The authors' main goals of this Letter are principally three: (i) A middleware architecture, defined as process unit (PU), which can communicate with personal electroencephalography (EEG) node (PEN) and cloud server (CS). The PU receives EEG signals from PEN, recognises the fatigue state of the driver, and transfer this information to CS. The CS sends notification messages to the surrounding vehicles. (ii) An android application for fatigue detection is built. The application can be used for the driver to detect the state of his/her fatigue based on EEG signals, and warn neighbourhood vehicles. (iii) The detection algorithm for driver fatigue is applied based on fuzzy entropy. The idea of 10-fold cross-validation and support vector machine are used for classified calculation. Experimental results show that the average accurate rate of detecting driver fatigue is about 95%, which implying that the algorithm is validity in detecting state of driver fatigue.Entities:
Keywords: accident prevention; android application; cloud computing; cloud server; electroencephalograph signals; electroencephalography; entropy; fuzzy entropy; fuzzy logic; medical signal detection; middleware architecture; mobile driver fatigue detection network; personal electroencephalography node; process unit; road traffic; support vector machine; support vector machines; traffic safety
Year: 2016 PMID: 28529761 PMCID: PMC5435952 DOI: 10.1049/htl.2016.0053
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Healthc Technol Lett ISSN: 2053-3713
Fig. 1Proposed system
Fig. 2Integration architecture
Fig. 3PU architecture
Fig. 4Subject in the simulated driving experiment
Fig. 5Sample EEG signals
a and b For normal state from FP1 channel
c and d For fatigue state from FP1 channel
Fig. 6Comparison of fuzzy entropy value
Test results given by10-fold cross-validation
| No. of subject | Accuracy |
|---|---|
| 1 | 0.95 |
| 2 | 0.96 |
| 3 | 0.97 |
| 4 | 0.98 |
| 5 | 0.94 |
| 6 | 0.96 |
| 7 | 0.97 |
| 8 | 0.95 |
| 9 | 0.93 |
| 10 | 0.97 |
| 11 | 0.94 |
| 12 | 0.99 |
| 0.95 ± 0.017 |
Performance comparison of the previous works
| Author | Method | Accuracy, % |
|---|---|---|
| Xiongn | combined entropy | 90 |
| Kaur and Singh [ | EMD | 84.8 |
| Correa | multimodal analysis | 83.6 |
| This paper | fuzzy entropy | 95 |
Fig. 7Android application