Literature DB >> 28529346

Wartime scars or reservoirs of biodiversity? The value of bomb crater ponds in aquatic conservation.

Csaba F Vad1, Attila L Péntek2, Nastasia J Cozma3, Angéla Földi4, Adrienn Tóth5, Bence Tóth6, NóraA Böde7, Arnold Móra5,8, Robert Ptacnik1, Éva Ács4,6, Katalin Zsuga9, Zsófia Horváth1.   

Abstract

Considering the ongoing loss of aquatic habitats, anthropogenic ponds are gaining importance as substitute habitats. It is therefore important to assess their functioning in comparison to their natural precursors. Here we assess the biodiversity value of sodic bomb crater ponds by comparing their gamma diversity to that of natural reference habitats, astatic soda pans, and assess their importance on the landscape level by studying alpha and beta diversity. We studied aquatic organisms ranging from algae to vertebrates in a dense cluster of 54 sodic bomb crater ponds in Central Europe. Despite the overall small area of the pond cluster, gamma diversity was comparable to that found in surveys of natural habitats that encompassed much wider spatial and temporal scales. We also found a considerable number of species shared with reference habitats, indicating that these anthropogenic habitats function as important refuge sites for several species that are associated with the endangered soda pans. Moreover, we found a number of regionally or worldwide rare species. Among the components of beta diversity, species replacement dominated community assembly. Individual ponds contributed similarly to beta diversity in terms of replacement, being equally important for maintaining high gamma diversity and emphasising the role of the pond network rather than individual ponds. This pattern was seen in all studied groups. Bomb crater ponds therefore acted as important contributors to aquatic biodiversity. Considering the tremendous losses of ponds throughout Europe, anthropogenic ponds should be taken into consideration in nature conservation, especially when occurring in pond networks.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anthropogenic habitats; Aquatic invertebrates; Benthic diatoms; Beta diversity partitioning; Temporary waters; Zooplankton

Year:  2017        PMID: 28529346      PMCID: PMC5438044          DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.02.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Conserv        ISSN: 0006-3207            Impact factor:   5.990


  9 in total

Review 1.  Systematic conservation planning.

Authors:  C R Margules; R L Pressey
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-05-11       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  How Should Beta-Diversity Inform Biodiversity Conservation?

Authors:  Jacob B Socolar; James J Gilroy; William E Kunin; David P Edwards
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Beta diversity as the variance of community data: dissimilarity coefficients and partitioning.

Authors:  Pierre Legendre; Miquel De Cáceres
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 9.492

4.  Body size and dispersal mode as key traits determining metacommunity structure of aquatic organisms.

Authors:  T De Bie; L De Meester; L Brendonck; K Martens; B Goddeeris; D Ercken; H Hampel; L Denys; L Vanhecke; K Van der Gucht; J Van Wichelen; W Vyverman; S A J Declerck
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 9.492

5.  Exploring species and site contributions to beta diversity in stream insect assemblages.

Authors:  Jani Heino; Mira Grönroos
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Scale-dependence of processes structuring dung beetle metacommunities using functional diversity and community deconstruction approaches.

Authors:  Pedro Giovâni da Silva; Malva Isabel Medina Hernández
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  How to maximally support local and regional biodiversity in applied conservation? Insights from pond management.

Authors:  Pieter Lemmens; Joachim Mergeay; Tom De Bie; Jeroen Van Wichelen; Luc De Meester; Steven A J Declerck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Putting beta-diversity on the map: broad-scale congruence and coincidence in the extremes.

Authors:  Meghan W McKnight; Peter S White; Robert I McDonald; John F Lamoreux; Wes Sechrest; Robert S Ridgely; Simon N Stuart
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  Beta diversity determinants in Badagongshan, a subtropical forest in central China.

Authors:  Xiujuan Qiao; Qianxi Li; Qinghu Jiang; Junmeng Lu; Scott Franklin; Zhiyao Tang; Qinggang Wang; Jiaxin Zhang; Zhijun Lu; Dachuan Bao; Yili Guo; Haibo Liu; Yaozhan Xu; Mingxi Jiang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Artificial wetlands as tools for frog conservation: stability and variability of reproduction characteristics in Sahara frog populations in Tunisian man-made lakes.

Authors:  Meher Bellakhal; André Neveu; Mouna Fertouna-Bellakhal; Lotfi Aleya
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Unexpected consequences of bombing. Community level response of epiphytic diatoms to environmental stress in a saline bomb crater pond area.

Authors:  Angéla Földi; Éva Ács; István Grigorszky; Luc Ector; Carlos Eduardo Wetzel; Gábor Várbíró; Keve Tihamér Kiss; Péter Dobosy; Zsuzsa Trábert; Andrea K Borsodi; Mónika Duleba
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Crater detection from commercial satellite imagery to estimate unexploded ordnance in Cambodian agricultural land.

Authors:  Erin Lin; Rongjun Qin; Jared Edgerton; Deren Kong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.