Literature DB >> 28529123

Implementing shared decision making in Denmark: First steps and future focus areas.

Karina Dahl Steffensen1, Vibe Hjelholt Baker2, Mette Marianne Vinter3.   

Abstract

What about the political climate? Although there is no explicit description of patient involvement in Danish legislation, patient-centred care is on the political agenda in Denmark. It is integrated as one of eight new national indicators of quality in health care, as well as in the most recent national plan for cancer treatment. What about tools for patient decision support? Development of evidence-based patient decision aids (PDAs) are still at an early stage in Denmark, but recent national and private funding has helped push the field forward. Furthermore, a few stakeholders have started working more systematically with developing and testing PDAs in clinical settings. What about implementation? There is growing interest among Danish health care professionals, but SDM is still far from standard practice in Denmark. Although some courses in SDM and use of PDAs now exist, few health care professionals have received systematic training, and there is little knowledge about implementation and sustainability of SDM in daily clinical practice. What does the future look like for SDM in Denmark? Future progress will depend on the extent to which SDM is systematically integrated in the daily routines of health care professionals and in patient trajectories across treatment courses. The Danish health care system needs to invest further in training and to start addressing the challenges on the organisational and system level, which affect implementation.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier GmbH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Denmark; Dänemark; Gesundheitspolitik; Implementierung; Systembarrieren; health policy; implementation; partizipative Entscheidungsfindung; shared decision making; system barriers

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28529123     DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2017.05.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes        ISSN: 1865-9217


  5 in total

1.  The challenge of involving old patients with polypharmacy in their medication during hospitalization in a medical emergency department: An ethnographic study.

Authors:  Pia Keinicke Fabricius; Ove Andersen; Karina Dahl Steffensen; Jeanette Wassar Kirk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Shared Decision Making with Acutely Hospitalized, Older Poly-Medicated Patients: A Mixed-Methods Study in an Emergency Department.

Authors:  Pia Keinicke Fabricius; Anissa Aharaz; Nina Thórný Stefánsdóttir; Morten Baltzer Houlind; Karina Dahl Steffensen; Ove Andersen; Jeanette Wassar Kirk
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Practitioners' views on shared decision-making implementation: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Anshu Ankolekar; Karina Dahl Steffensen; Karina Olling; Andre Dekker; Leonard Wee; Cheryl Roumen; Hajar Hasannejadasl; Rianne Fijten
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Shared decision making when patients consider surgery for lumbar herniated disc: development and test of a patient decision aid.

Authors:  Stina Brogård Andersen; Mikkel Ø Andersen; Leah Y Carreon; Angela Coulter; Karina Dahl Steffensen
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 2.796

5.  Pelvic organ prolapse and treatment decisions- developing an online preference-sensitive tool to support shared decisions.

Authors:  Mette Hulbaek; Eva Knutz; Niels Teglhus Ebbesen; Jette Primdahl; Jesper Bo Nielsen; Regner Birkelund
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 2.796

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.