Literature DB >> 28528984

Risk reclassification ability of uric acid for cardiovascular outcomes in essential hypertension.

Maria Perticone1, Giovanni Tripepi2, Raffaele Maio3, Antonio Cimellaro4, Desirée Addesi4, Rossella Baggetta2, Angela Sciacqua4, Giorgio Sesti4, Francesco Perticone5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hyperuricemia is associated with incident cardiovascular events in different settings of patients. We tested whether the inclusion of uric acid (UA) in Cox models including standard risk factors allows to better stratify cardiovascular risk in a cohort of 1522 naïve hypertensives with preserved renal function.
METHODS: We used multiple Cox regression models to assess the independent effect of UA on cardiovascular outcomes, and Harrell'C index, Net Reclassification Index (NRI), and Integrated Discrimination Improvement (IDI) as indicators of the additional prognostic value of UA beyond and above that provided by standard risk factors and estimated glomerular filtration rate (e-GFR). Study outcomes were fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events and fatal and nonfatal coronary outcomes/death due to other cardiovascular events.
RESULTS: UA resulted strongly related to both outcomes in unadjusted Cox regression analyses (P<0.001). Inclusion of UA into multiple Cox regression models including Framingham risk factors and e-GFR did not affect the association between UA and outcomes (fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events, HR=1.44, 95% CI=1.36-1.55, P<0.001; fatal and nonfatal coronary outcomes/death due to other cardiovascular events, HR=1.48, 95% CI=1.36-1.61, P<0.001). Inclusion of UA into basic Cox models provided an increase in all indexes of prognostic accuracy for both outcomes: Harrell'C index: +5%; NRI: +24.9%; IDI: +7.6%, all P<0.001; and Harrell'C index: +5%; NRI: +25%; IDI: +6.3%, all P<0.001, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: UA is an independent predictor of cardiovascular outcomes and increases prognostic accuracy of Cox models, including Framingham risk factors and e-GFR, in hypertensives with normal renal function, allowing a risk reclassification.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiovascular risk; Essential hypertension; Uric acid

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28528984     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.05.051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  10 in total

1.  Expert consensus for the diagnosis and treatment of patient with hyperuricemia and high cardiovascular risk: 2021 update.

Authors:  Claudio Borghi; Justyna Domienik-Karłowicz; Andrzej Tykarski; Krystyna Widecka; Krzysztof J Filipiak; Miłosz J Jaguszewski; Krzysztof Narkiewicz; Giuseppe Mancia
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 2.737

2.  Label-Free Uric Acid Estimation of Spot Urine Using Portable Device Based on UV Spectrophotometry.

Authors:  Tsung-Jui Lin; Kai-Ting Yen; Chien-Fan Chen; Shuo-Ting Yan; Kuan-Wei Su; Ya-Ling Chiang
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 3.847

3.  Red cell distribution width and homocysteine act as independent risk factors for cardiovascular events in newly diagnostic essential hypertension.

Authors:  Lian-Man He; Chuan-Yu Gao; Yong Wang; Hao Wang; Hai-Ying Zhao
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-10-21

4.  Serum uric acid on admission cannot predict long-term outcome of critically ill patients: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Qinchang Chen; Kai Huang; Lingling Li; Xixia Lin; Cong Ding; Junrui Zhang; Qingui Chen
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 2.423

5.  Relationship between oxidative stress and inflammation in hyperuricemia: Analysis based on asymptomatic young patients with primary hyperuricemia.

Authors:  You Zhou; Mingcai Zhao; Zheyan Pu; Guoqiang Xu; Xiangkun Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Sensing soluble uric acid by Naip1-Nlrp3 platform.

Authors:  Eicke Latz; Niels Olsen Saraiva Camara; Tarcio Teodoro Braga; Mariana Rodrigues Davanso; Davi Mendes; Tiago Antonio de Souza; Anderson Fernandes de Brito; Mario Costa Cruz; Meire Ioshie Hiyane; Dhemerson Souza de Lima; Vinicius Nunes; Juliana de Fátima Giarola; Denio Emanuel Pires Souto; Tomasz Próchnicki; Mario Lauterbach; Stellee Marcela Petris Biscaia; Rilton Alves de Freitas; Rui Curi; Alessandra Pontillo
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 8.469

7.  A highly sensitive dual-read assay using nitrogen-doped carbon dots for the quantitation of uric acid in human serum and urine samples.

Authors:  Fan Li; Jiahan Rui; Ziyu Yan; Ping Qiu; Xiaomin Tang
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2021-08-29       Impact factor: 5.833

8.  Sensitivity Detection of Uric Acid and Creatinine in Human Urine Based on Nanoporous Gold.

Authors:  Keshuai Shang; Shuangjue Wang; Siyu Chen; Xia Wang
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-01

9.  Baseline Serum Uric Acid Levels Are Associated with All-Cause Mortality in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Ziliang Ye; Haili Lu; Manyun Long; Lang Li
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 3.434

10.  Prognostic value of hyperuricemia for patients with sepsis in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Shizhen Liu; Zhihua Zhong; Fanna Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 4.996

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.