Literature DB >> 28528905

A Pheromone Antagonist Regulates Optimal Mating Time in the Moth Helicoverpa armigera.

Hetan Chang1, Yang Liu2, Dong Ai2, Xingchuan Jiang3, Shuanglin Dong4, Guirong Wang5.   

Abstract

Many insect species use multi-component sex pheromones to discriminate among potential mating partners [1-5]. In moths, pheromone blends tend to be dominated by one or two major components, but behavioral responses are frequently optimized by the inclusion of less abundant minor components [6]. An increasing number of studies have shown that female insects use these chemicals to convey their mating availability to males, who can assess the maturity of females and thus decide when to mate [7, 8]. However, little is known about the biological mechanisms that enable males to assess female reproductive status. In this study, we found that females of Helicoverpa armigera avoid nonoptimal mating by inhibiting males with pheromone antagonist cis-11-Hexadecenol (Z11-16:OH). We also show that this antagonist-mediated optimization of mating time ensures maximum fecundity. To further investigate molecular aspects of this phenomenon, we used the CRISPR/Cas9 system to knock out odorant receptor 16 (OR16), the only pheromone receptor tuned to Z11-16:OH. In mutant males, electrophysiological and behavioral responses to Z11-16:OH were abolished. Inability to detect Z11-16:OH prompted the males to mate with immature females, which resulted in significantly reduced viability of eggs. In conclusion, our study demonstrates that the sensitivity of OR16 to Z11-16:OH regulates optimal mating time and thus ensures maximum fecundity. These results may suggest novel strategies to disrupt pest insect mating.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRISPR/Cas9; Helicoverpa armigera; cis-11-Hexadecenol; mating; odorant receptor; pheromone antagonist; sex pheromone

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28528905     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.04.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  18 in total

Review 1.  Evolution, developmental expression and function of odorant receptors in insects.

Authors:  Hua Yan; Shadi Jafari; Gregory Pask; Xiaofan Zhou; Danny Reinberg; Claude Desplan
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Do Helicoverpa armigera Moths Signal Their Fecundity by Emission of an Antagonist?

Authors:  Gabriel P Hughes; Ring T Cardé
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Identification of Chemosensory Genes, Including Candidate Pheromone Receptors, in Phauda flammans (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Phaudidae) Through Transcriptomic Analyses.

Authors:  Jin Hu; Xiao-Yun Wang; Liu-Su Tan; Wen Lu; Xia-Lin Zheng
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 4.755

Review 4.  Progress and Prospects of CRISPR/Cas Systems in Insects and Other Arthropods.

Authors:  Dan Sun; Zhaojiang Guo; Yong Liu; Youjun Zhang
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 4.566

5.  Identification and expression analysis of putative chemoreception genes from Cyrtorhinus lividipennis (Hemiptera: Miridae) antennal transcriptome.

Authors:  Gui-Yao Wang; Jing-Lei Zhu; Wen-Wu Zhou; Su Liu; Quais Md Khairul; Naved Ahmad Ansari; Zeng-Rong Zhu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Odorant Receptors and Odorant-Binding Proteins as Insect Pest Control Targets: A Comparative Analysis.

Authors:  Herbert Venthur; Jing-Jiang Zhou
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  Proceeding From in vivo Functions of Pheromone Receptors: Peripheral-Coding Perception of Pheromones From Three Closely Related Species, Helicoverpa armigera, H. assulta, and Heliothis virescens.

Authors:  Bing Wang; Yang Liu; Gui-Rong Wang
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  A chromosome-level genome assembly of Cydia pomonella provides insights into chemical ecology and insecticide resistance.

Authors:  Fanghao Wan; Chuanlin Yin; Rui Tang; Maohua Chen; Qiang Wu; Cong Huang; Wanqiang Qian; Omar Rota-Stabelli; Nianwan Yang; Shuping Wang; Guirong Wang; Guifen Zhang; Jianyang Guo; Liuqi Aloy Gu; Longfei Chen; Longsheng Xing; Yu Xi; Feiling Liu; Kejian Lin; Mengbo Guo; Wei Liu; Kang He; Ruizheng Tian; Emmanuelle Jacquin-Joly; Pierre Franck; Myriam Siegwart; Lino Ometto; Gianfranco Anfora; Mark Blaxter; Camille Meslin; Petr Nguyen; Martina Dalíková; František Marec; Jérôme Olivares; Sandrine Maugin; Jianru Shen; Jinding Liu; Jinmeng Guo; Jiapeng Luo; Bo Liu; Wei Fan; Likai Feng; Xianxin Zhao; Xiong Peng; Kang Wang; Lang Liu; Haixia Zhan; Wanxue Liu; Guoliang Shi; Chunyan Jiang; Jisu Jin; Xiaoqing Xian; Sha Lu; Mingli Ye; Meizhen Li; Minglu Yang; Renci Xiong; James R Walters; Fei Li
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 9.  Gene Drive for Mosquito Control: Where Did It Come from and Where Are We Headed?

Authors:  Vanessa M Macias; Johanna R Ohm; Jason L Rasgon
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-09-02       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Female Japanese quail visually differentiate testosterone-dependent male attractiveness for mating preferences.

Authors:  Gen Hiyama; Shusei Mizushima; Mei Matsuzaki; Yasuko Tobari; Jae-Hoon Choi; Takashi Ono; Masaoki Tsudzuki; Satoshi Makino; Gen Tamiya; Naoki Tsukahara; Shoei Sugita; Tomohiro Sasanami
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.