Literature DB >> 28528491

High-Resolution Manometry Evaluation of Pressures at the Pharyngo-upper Esophageal Area in Patients with Oropharyngeal Dysphagia Due to Vagal Paralysis.

Bruno Rezende Pinna1, Fernando A M Herbella2, Noemi de Biase1, Thays C G Vaiano3, Marco G Patti4.   

Abstract

The motility of the pharynx, upper esophageal sphincter (UES), and proximal esophagus in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia is still not entirely understood. High-resolution manometry (HRM) was recently added to the armamentarium for the study of this area. This study aims to describe HRM findings in patients with vagal paralysis. Sixteen patients (mean age 54 years, 69% females) with oropharyngeal dysphagia due to unilateral vagal paralysis were prospectively studied. All patients underwent HRM. Motility of the UES and at the topography of the velopharynx and epiglottis were recorded. (1) UES relaxation is compromised in a minority of patients, (2) epiglottis pressure does not follow a specific pattern, (3) vellum is hypotonic in half of the patients, (4) dysphagia is related to a low pharyngeal pressure, not to a flow obstruction at the level of the UES, and (5) aspiration is related to low pressures at the level of the UES and epiglottis and higher pressures at the level of the vellum. Pharyngeal motility is significantly impaired in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia and unilateral vagal paralysis. In half of the cases, UES resting pressure is preserved due to unilateral innervation and relaxation is normal in most patients. Dysphagia therapy in these patients must be directed toward improvement in the oropharyngeal motility not at the UES.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deglutition; Deglutition disorders; Dysphagia; High-resolution manometry; Oropharyngeal dysphagia; Pharynx; Upper esophageal sphincter

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28528491     DOI: 10.1007/s00455-017-9811-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dysphagia        ISSN: 0179-051X            Impact factor:   3.438


  17 in total

1.  Can high resolution manometry parameters for achalasia be obtained by conventional manometry?

Authors:  Fernando Am Herbella; Marco G Patti
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2015-08-15

2.  Incidence of vocal fold immobility in patients with dysphagia.

Authors:  Steven B Leder; Douglas A Ross
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.438

3.  The normal swallow: muscular and neurophysiological control.

Authors:  Stephanie M Shaw; Rosemary Martino
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 3.346

4.  Vocal fold immobility and aspiration status: a direct replication study.

Authors:  Steven B Leder; Debra M Suiter; Dianne Duffey; Benjamin L Judson
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2011-08-21       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 5.  Anatomy and physiology of the upper esophageal sphincter.

Authors:  I M Lang; R Shaker
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1997-11-24       Impact factor: 4.965

6.  Neuromuscular organization of the human upper esophageal sphincter.

Authors:  L Mu; I Sanders
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 1.547

7.  The innervation of the human upper esophageal sphincter.

Authors:  L Mu; I Sanders
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.438

8.  A method to objectively assess swallow function in adults with suspected aspiration.

Authors:  Taher I Omari; Eddy Dejaeger; Dirk van Beckevoort; Ann Goeleven; Geoffrey P Davidson; John Dent; Jan Tack; Nathalie Rommel
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 9.  Pharyngeal and upper esophageal sphincter manometry in the evaluation of dysphagia.

Authors:  A Hila; J A Castell; D O Castell
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.062

10.  Manometric characteristics of the pharynx, upper esophageal sphincter, esophagus, and lower esophageal sphincter in patients with oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy.

Authors:  J A Castell; D O Castell; C A Duranceau; P Topart
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.438

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  High-Resolution Pharyngeal Manometry and Impedance: Protocols and Metrics-Recommendations of a High-Resolution Pharyngeal Manometry International Working Group.

Authors:  Taher I Omari; Michelle Ciucci; Kristin Gozdzikowska; Ester Hernández; Katherine Hutcheson; Corinne Jones; Julia Maclean; Nogah Nativ-Zeltzer; Emily Plowman; Nicole Rogus-Pulia; Nathalie Rommel; Ashli O'Rourke
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 2.  The upper esophageal sphincter in the high-resolution manometry era.

Authors:  Pedro Norton; Fernando A M Herbella; Francisco Schlottmann; Marco G Patti
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Detecting Aspiration During FEES with Narrow Band Imaging in a Clinical Setting.

Authors:  Claire Stanley; Paul Paddle; Susie Griffiths; Adnan Safdar; Debra Phyland
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 4.  High-resolution colonic manometry and its clinical application in patients with colonic dysmotility: A review.

Authors:  Yu-Wei Li; Yong-Jun Yu; Fei Fei; Min-Ying Zheng; Shi-Wu Zhang
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 1.337

5.  Pharyngeal motility in patients submitted to type I thyroplasty.

Authors:  Bruno Rezende Pinna; Fernando A M Herbella; Noemi de Biase
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-12-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.