Literature DB >> 28528075

Adopting the new World Health Organization diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes: How the prevalence changes in a high-risk region in Australia.

Vincent W Wong1, Andrew Lin2, Hamish Russell2.   

Abstract

AIMS: In this study, we assessed changes in prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in a region with diverse cultural backgrounds in Australia under the new World Health Organization (WHO) diagnostic criteria, with reference to the woman's ethnicity, age and pre-pregnant body mass index (BMI).
METHODS: We recorded results of all 75-gram oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs) performed on pregnant women between February and December 2015 together with their demographic details, and determined the prevalence of GDM based on the old Australian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society (ADIPS) and the new WHO criteria respectively.
RESULTS: Over that period, 2140 OGTTs were performed in 1725 pregnant women. The prevalence of GDM was 14.8% (255/1725 women) under old ADIPS criteria, but went up to 29.6% (510/1725) when using WHO criteria. An increase in prevalence was observed in all ethnic groups. Women from East/South-East Asia had the lowest increment (from 19.2 to 22.3%) while those from South Asia had the highest (from 22.0 to 44.4%). Prevalence of GDM was 45.9% amongst women with BMI>30kg/m2. For women from South Asia with BMI>30kg/m2, 70.0% would have GDM. Birth outcomes were similar between women who would have GDM under WHO but not the old ADIPS criteria (untreated), and those who were treated for GDM under old criteria.
CONCLUSION: In parts of Australia, adoption of WHO diagnostic criteria could result in doubling of the prevalence of GDM, depending on the women's demographic characteristics. Women from South Asia or those with obesity should be targeted for pre-pregnant lifestyle intervention.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gestational diabetes mellitus; Glucose tolerance test; Prevalence; World Health Organization

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28528075     DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2017.04.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract        ISSN: 0168-8227            Impact factor:   5.602


  8 in total

Review 1.  Ethnic Disparities in Gestational Diabetes.

Authors:  Lili Yuen; Vincent W Wong; David Simmons
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 4.810

2.  Fetal biometry for guiding the medical management of women with gestational diabetes mellitus for improving maternal and perinatal health.

Authors:  Ujvala Rao; Bradley de Vries; Glynis P Ross; Adrienne Gordon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-09-03

Review 3.  Associations of Diet and Physical Activity with Risk for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jovana Mijatovic-Vukas; Louise Capling; Sonia Cheng; Emmanuel Stamatakis; Jimmy Louie; N Wah Cheung; Tania Markovic; Glynis Ross; Alistair Senior; Jennie C Brand-Miller; Victoria M Flood
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 5.717

4.  Implications of the introduction of new criteria for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes: a health outcome and cost of care analysis.

Authors:  Thomas J Cade; Alexander Polyakov; Shaun P Brennecke
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 5.  The Unrealised Potential for Predicting Pregnancy Complications in Women with Gestational Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal.

Authors:  Shamil D Cooray; Lihini A Wijeyaratne; Georgia Soldatos; John Allotey; Jacqueline A Boyle; Helena J Teede
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Dietary intervention strategies for ethnic Chinese women with gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ching S Wan; Alison Nankervis; Helena Teede; Rosalie Aroni
Journal:  Nutr Diet       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 2.333

7.  Antidiabetic medication use during pregnancy: an international utilization study.

Authors:  Carolyn E Cesta; Jacqueline M Cohen; Laura Pazzagli; Brian T Bateman; Gabriella Bröms; Kristjana Einarsdóttir; Kari Furu; Alys Havard; Anna Heino; Sonia Hernandez-Diaz; Krista F Huybrechts; Øystein Karlstad; Helle Kieler; Jiong Li; Maarit K Leinonen; Hanne L Gulseth; Duong Tran; Yongfu Yu; Helga Zoega; Ingvild Odsbu
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2019-11-02

8.  Prognostic prediction models for pregnancy complications in women with gestational diabetes: a protocol for systematic review, critical appraisal and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shamil D Cooray; Jacqueline A Boyle; Georgia Soldatos; Lihini A Wijeyaratne; Helena J Teede
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2019-11-11
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.