Literature DB >> 28527673

Minimal access surgery compared to laparotomy for secondary surgical cytoreduction in patients with recurrent ovarian carcinoma: Perioperative and oncologic outcomes.

Ane Gerda Z Eriksson1, Ashley Graul1, Miao C Yu1, Anthony Halko1, Dennis S Chi2, Oliver Zivanovic2, Ginger J Gardner2, Yukio Sonoda2, Richard R Barakat2, Nadeem R Abu-Rustum2, Mario M Leitao3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the perioperative outcomes of minimal access surgery (MAS) in secondary surgical cytoreduction (SSCR) for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (ROC); to compare oncologic outcomes with laparotomy (LAP).
METHODS: Using an institutional database, we identified all patients with ROC undergoing SSCR from 1/5/09-6/14/14. Selection for MAS or LAP was based on surgeon preference. To minimize selection bias, preoperative imaging was reviewed for all LAP cases. In this manner, we identified potential MAS candidates, who were used in the comparison. Intent-to-treat analyses were undertaken using statistical testing.
RESULTS: 170 cases were identified (131 LAP, 8 LSC, 31 RBT). 68/131 (52%) LAP cases were deemed potential candidates for MAS. Feasibility analyses included 68 LAP and 39 MAS cases. Six (15%) MAS cases were converted to LAP. Median age, BMI, operative time did not differ significantly between the groups. Complete gross resection was achieved in 37/39 (95%) MAS, 63/68 (93%) LAP (P=1.0). Median estimated blood loss was 50cm3 (range, 5-500) MAS, 150cm3 (range, 0-1500) LAP (P=0.001). Median length of stay was 1day (range, 0-23) MAS, 5days (range, 1-21) LAP (P<0.001). Complications occurred in 3/39 (8%) MAS, 15/68 (22%) LAP (P=0.06). The 2-year progression-free survival was 56.1% (SE 9%) MAS, 63.5% (SE 6%) LAP (P=1.0). The 2-year overall survival was 92.2% (SE 5.4%) MAS, 81.4% (SE 5.5%) LAP (P=0.7).
CONCLUSIONS: MAS for SSCR is feasible in properly selected cases. MAS is associated with favorable perioperative outcomes and similar oncologic outcomes, compared to LAP.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Minimal access surgery; Ovarian carcinoma; Secondary surgical cytoreduction

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28527673     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.05.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  7 in total

Review 1.  Laparotomy vs. minimally invasive surgery for ovarian cancer recurrence: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stefano Uccella; Massimo P Franchi; Stefano Cianci; Pier Carlo Zorzato; Francesca Bertoli; Salvatore Gueli Alletti; Fabio Ghezzi; Giovanni Scambia
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2020-08

2.  Minimally Invasive Secondary Cytoreductive Surgery for Superficial Celiac and Cardio-Phrenic Isolated Nodal Recurrence of Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  M Loverro; R Ergasti; C Conte; V Gallitelli; D Nachira; G Scaglione; A Fagotti; G Scambia; V Gallotta
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-01-08       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  A score system for complete cytoreduction in selected recurrent ovarian cancer patients undergoing secondary cytoreductive surgery: predictors- and nomogram-based analyses.

Authors:  Giorgio Bogani; Elena Tagliabue; Mauro Signorelli; Antonino Ditto; Fabio Martinelli; Valentina Chiappa; Lavinia Mosca; Ilaria Sabatucci; Umberto Leone Roberti Maggiore; Domenica Lorusso; Francesco Raspagliesi
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 4.401

4.  Artificial intelligence weights the importance of factors predicting complete cytoreduction at secondary cytoreductive surgery for recurrent ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Giorgio Bogani; Diego Rossetti; Antonino Ditto; Fabio Martinelli; Valentina Chiappa; Lavinia Mosca; Umberto Leone Roberti Maggiore; Stefano Ferla; Domenica Lorusso; Francesco Raspagliesi
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 4.401

5.  The efficacy of secondary cytoreductive surgery for recurrent ovarian, tubal, or peritoneal cancer in Tian-model low-risk patients.

Authors:  Makiko So; Taito Miyamoto; Ryusuke Murakami; Kaoru Abiko; Junzo Hamanishi; Tsukasa Baba; Masaki Mandai
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 4.401

6.  Does MIS Play a Role in the Treatment of Advanced Ovarian Cancer?

Authors:  Augusto Pereira; Javier F Magrina; Paul M Magtibay; Joao Siufi Neto; Daniela F S Siufi; Yu-Hui H Chang; Tirso Perez-Medina
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 6.575

7.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic debulking surgery for recurrent adult granulosa cell tumors.

Authors:  Jolijn W Groeneweg; Joline F Roze; Wouter B Veldhuis; Jelle P Ruurda; Cornelis G Gerestein; Ronald P Zweemer
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2021-05-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.