Literature DB >> 28527139

Exploration of an innovative draw solution for a forward osmosis-membrane distillation desalination process.

Nguyen Cong Nguyen1,2, Shiao-Shing Chen3, Shubham Jain4, Hau Thi Nguyen5,6, Saikat Sinha Ray5, Huu Hao Ngo7, Wenshan Guo8, Ngoc Tuan Lam6, Hung Cong Duong9.   

Abstract

Forward osmosis (FO) has emerged as a viable technology to alleviate the global water crisis. The greatest challenge facing the application of FO technology is the lack of an ideal draw solution with high water flux and low reverse salt flux. Hence, the objective of this study was to enhance FO by lowering reverse salt flux and maintaining high water flux; the method involved adding small concentrations of Al2(SO4)3 to a MgCl2 draw solution. Results showed that 0.5 M MgCl2 mixed with 0.05 M of Al2(SO4)3 at pH 6.5 achieved a lower reverse salt flux (0.53 gMH) than that of pure MgCl2 (1.55 gMH) using an FO cellulose triacetate nonwoven (CTA-NW) membrane. This was due possibly to the flocculation of aluminum hydroxide in the mixed draw solution that constricted membrane pores, resulting in reduced salt diffusion. Moreover, average water fluxes of 4.09 and 1.74 L/m2-h (LMH) were achieved over 180 min, respectively, when brackish water (5 g/L) and sea water (35 g/L) were used as feed solutions. Furthermore, three types of membrane distillation (MD) membranes were selected for draw solution recovery; of these, a polytetrafluoroethylene membrane with a pore size of 0.45 μm proved to be the most effective in achieving a high salt rejection (99.90%) and high water flux (5.41 LMH) in a diluted draw solution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Desalination; Draw solution; Flocculation; Forward osmosis; Membrane distillation; Seawater

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28527139     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-9192-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  9 in total

1.  Comparison of the removal of hydrophobic trace organic contaminants by forward osmosis and reverse osmosis.

Authors:  Ming Xie; Long D Nghiem; William E Price; Menachem Elimelech
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 11.236

2.  Rejection of pharmaceuticals by forward osmosis membranes.

Authors:  Xue Jin; Junhong Shan; Can Wang; Jing Wei; Chuyang Y Tang
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 10.588

3.  Water: purification with a pinch of salt.

Authors:  Quirin Schiermeier
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Energy issues in desalination processes.

Authors:  Raphael Semiat
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Ferric and cobaltous hydroacid complexes for forward osmosis (FO) processes.

Authors:  Qingchun Ge; Fengjiang Fu; Tai-Shung Chung
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 11.236

6.  The future of seawater desalination: energy, technology, and the environment.

Authors:  Menachem Elimelech; William A Phillip
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Application of forward osmosis on dewatering of high nutrient sludge.

Authors:  Nguyen Cong Nguyen; Shiao-Shing Chen; Hung-Yin Yang; Nguyen Thi Hau
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 9.642

8.  Exploration of polyelectrolytes as draw solutes in forward osmosis processes.

Authors:  Qingchun Ge; Jincai Su; Gary L Amy; Tai-Shung Chung
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 11.236

9.  Innovative sponge-based moving bed-osmotic membrane bioreactor hybrid system using a new class of draw solution for municipal wastewater treatment.

Authors:  Nguyen Cong Nguyen; Shiao-Shing Chen; Hau Thi Nguyen; Saikat Sinha Ray; Huu Hao Ngo; Wenshan Guo; Po-Hsun Lin
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 11.236

  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  A novel application of membrane distillation to facilitate nickel recovery from electroplating wastewater.

Authors:  Hung C Duong; Thao M Pham; Son T Luong; Ky V Nguyen; Diu T Nguyen; Ashley J Ansari; Long D Nghiem
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Effects of fouling on separation performance by forward osmosis: the role of specific organic foulants.

Authors:  Lei Zheng; William E Price; Long D Nghiem
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 3.  A Review on the Development of an Integer System Coupling Forward Osmosis Membrane and Ultrasound Waves for Water Desalination Processes.

Authors:  Bara A K Al-Sakaji; Sameer Al-Asheh; Munjed A Maraqa
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 4.967

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.