Literature DB >> 28526193

Effects of multiple breath hold reproducibility on treatment localization and dosimetric accuracy in radiotherapy of left-sided breast cancer with voluntary deep inspiration breath hold technique.

Mika Kapanen1, Marko Laaksomaa2, Jani Pehkonen3, Mikko Haltamo3, Helmi Luukkanen3, Turkka Lehtonen3, Simo Hyödynmaa4, Pirkko-Liisa Kellokumpu-Lehtinen5.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of breath hold reproducibility on positional and dosimetric errors in radiotherapy of patients with left-sided breast cancer (LSBC) treated with voluntary deep inspiration breath hold (vDIBH) technique. Clinical data from 2 groups of patients with LSBC were retrospectively investigated: (1) those irradiated for the whole breast only (WB group, n = 20) using typically from 3 to 5 breath holds per treatment session and (2) those irradiated simultaneously also for supraclavicular lymph nodes (WB + SLN group, n = 27) using from 7 to 9 breath holds per fraction. Setup and field images (n = 1365) from tangential breast fields, and anterior and posterior lymph node fields were analyzed to obtain total, inter-, and intrafractional residual positional errors of the chest wall and clavicle. The dosimetric effect of intrafractional positional errors was investigated at the abutment level of breast and lymph node fields. The total systematic setup error in the longitudinal (superior-inferior [SI]) direction was 1.4 and 1.9 mm (1 standard deviation, p = 0.049) for the WB and WB + SLN groups, respectively, whereas in the anterior/lateral direction, the error was 1.2 mm for both groups. In the SI direction, the systematic intrafractional error was also larger in the WB + SLN group (1.9 vs 1.1 mm, p = 0.003). The latter positional errors correlated moderately (ρ = 0.51) with the number of breath holds. Mean intrafractional errors of at least 2 mm were observed for 38% of the patients in the WB + SLN group. These errors resulted in a dosimetric error from 8.3% to 10.1% (1 cc). The total localization errors and needed setup margins were wider for the WB + SLN group, due to increased amount of breath holds in treatment session. Mean intrafraction movements ≥ 2 mm were shown to occur with this patient group in the SI direction, requiring intrafractional positional monitoring and corrective actions in daily practice.
Copyright © 2017 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adjuvant radiotherapy; Breast cancer; Breath hold; Lymph nodes; Patient setup

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28526193     DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2017.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Dosim        ISSN: 1873-4022            Impact factor:   1.482


  8 in total

1.  Comparing treatment uncertainty for ultra- vs. standard-hypofractionated breast radiation therapy based on in-vivo dosimetry.

Authors:  Yawo A C Fiagan; Evy Bossuyt; Melanie Machiels; Daan Nevens; Charlotte Billiet; Philip Poortmans; Thierry Gevaert; Dirk Verellen
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-05-13

2.  Voluntary Deep Inspiration Breath-hold Reduces the Heart Dose Without Compromising the Target Volume Coverage During Radiotherapy for Left-sided Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Noora Al-Hammadi; Palmira Caparrotti; Carole Naim; Jillian Hayes; Katherine Rebecca Benson; Ana Vasic; Hissa Al-Abdulla; Rabih Hammoud; Saju Divakar; Primoz Petric
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 2.991

3.  AlignRT® and Catalyst™ in whole-breast radiotherapy with DIBH: Is IGRT still needed?

Authors:  Marko Laaksomaa; Sebastian Sarudis; Maija Rossi; Turkka Lehtonen; Jani Pehkonen; Jenny Remes; Helmi Luukkanen; Tanja Skyttä; Mika Kapanen
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Prolonging deep inspiration breath-hold time to 3 min during radiotherapy, a simple solution.

Authors:  Vincent Vakaet; Hans Van Hulle; Max Schoepen; Els Van Caelenberg; Annick Van Greveling; Jeroen Holvoet; Chris Monten; Luc De Baerdemaeker; Wilfried De Neve; Marc Coppens; Liv Veldeman
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-02-23

5.  Free breathing VMAT versus deep inspiration breath-hold 3D conformal radiation therapy for early stage left-sided breast cancer.

Authors:  Christer A Jensen; Marit Funderud; Christoffer Lervåg
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Evaluation of image-guided and surface-guided radiotherapy for breast cancer patients treated in deep inspiration breath-hold: A single institution experience.

Authors:  Joan Penninkhof; Kimm Fremeijer; Kirsten Offereins-van Harten; Cynthia van Wanrooij; Sandra Quint; Britt Kunnen; Nienke Hoffmans-Holtzer; Annemarie Swaak; Margreet Baaijens; Maarten Dirkx
Journal:  Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-02-17

7.  Inter-fraction heart displacement during voluntary deep inspiration breath hold radiation therapy without visual feedback measured by daily CBCT.

Authors:  Sofian Benkhaled; Carolina Gomes da Silveira Cauduro; Nicolas Jullian; Antoine Desmet; Diana Rodriguez; Younes Jourani; Dirk Van Gestel; Alex De Caluwé
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 5.738

8.  Impact of Positioning Errors on the Dosimetry of Breath-Hold-Based Volumetric Arc Modulated and Tangential Field-in-Field Left-Sided Breast Treatments.

Authors:  Yanqun Zhao; Peng Diao; Da Zhang; Juxiang Wu; Xin Xin; Davide Fontanarosa; Min Liu; Jie Li; Lucia Clara Orlandini
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 6.244

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.