| Literature DB >> 28526084 |
Slavica Ranković1, Tamara Popović2, Jasmina Debeljak Martačić2, Snježana Petrović2, Mirko Tomić3, Đurđica Ignjatović3, Gordana Tovilović-Kovačević3, Maria Glibetić2.
Abstract
Entities:
Keywords: Fatty acids; Fish based diet; Gender; Milk based diet; Rats
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28526084 PMCID: PMC5437631 DOI: 10.1186/s12944-017-0483-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 3.876
Determination of contents of rat chow
| Standard diet | Fish based diet | Milk based diet | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proteins % | 20 | 21.15 | 16.35 |
| Fats % | 4.2 | 2.42 | 4.07 |
| Cellulose % | 8 | 4.44 | 3.51 |
| Starch % | 38 | 40.31 | 36.86 |
| Ash % | 10 | 5.54 | 4.16 |
| Energy KJ/100 g | 1100 | 1128.51 | 1105.5 |
| Carbohydrates % | 3.3 | 1.49 | 4.43 |
| Calcium % | 1 | 1.25 | 0.98 |
| Phosphor % | 0.5 | 0.12 | 0.07 |
| Sodium mg/kg | 0.25 | 0. 3242 | 0. 2503 |
| Magnesium mg/kg | 1000 | 1673 | 1586 |
| Iron mg/kg | 100 | 126.2 | 88.12 |
| Zn mg/kg | 100 | 35.2 | 27.11 |
| Vit E mg/kg | 25 | 54.96 | 23.1 |
| Vit A IU/kg | 10 | 29.86 | 24.25 |
Fatty acids profiles and overall SFA, MUFA, PUFA in different types of diet
| Fatty acids (%) | Standard food | Fish based diet | Milk based diet |
|---|---|---|---|
| C6:0 | 2.769 | 1.627 | |
| C8:0 | 0.656 | ||
| C10:0 | 1.5109 | ||
| C11:0 | 0.173 | ||
| C12:0 | 0.05 | 0.0417 | 1.813 |
| C14:0 | 0.51 | 1.5030 | 6.344 |
| C14:1 | 0.539 | ||
| C15:0 | 0.08 | 0.1846 | 0.724 |
| C16:0 | 13.55 | 15.555 | 25.36 |
| C16:1 | 1.04 | 1.5731 | 1.585 |
| C17:0 | 0.0356 | 0.543 | |
| C17:1 | 0.092 | 0.197 | |
| C18:0 | 2.30 | 3.394 | 7.028 |
| C18:1n-9 | 24.95 | 20.798 | |
| C18:1n-9 t | 1.34 | ||
| C18:1n-9c | 21.54 | ||
| C18:2n-6 | 49.93 | 38.955 | 23.458 |
| C20:0 | 0.414 | 0.451 | |
| C18:3n-3 | 1.17 | 1.434 | 2.012 |
| C18:3n-6 | 0.19 | ||
| C20:1 | 3.25 | 1.548 | |
| C21:0 | 3.249 | 0.33 | |
| C20:2 | 0.13 | 0.5935 | 0.036 |
| C20:4n-6 | 1.00 | ||
| C22:0 | 0.2835 | 0.198 | |
| C22:1n-9 | 1.8511 | 0.233 | |
| C20:3n-3 | 0.72 | ||
| C20:3n-6 | 0.12 | 0.995 | |
| C23:0 | 0.322 | 0.289 | |
| C24:0 | 1.38 | ||
| C20:5n-3 | 0.06 | 2.4738 | |
| C22:6n-3 | 0.58 | 2.928 | |
| SFA | 18.91 | 27.75 | 47.05 |
| MUFA | 29.24 | 25.86 | 25.43 |
| PUFA | 52.9 | 46.38 | 27.50 |
Fig. 1ALT and AST activities and the concentration of glucose in plasma. Data are given as mean ± SE (n = 6). Results were tested by two-way ANOVA with sex (S) and diet (D) factors (p significance was showed) and post hoc tested by Tukey’s HSD. *** - p < 0.001, ** - p < 0.01, * - p < 0.05. MS – males fed on standard diet, MF – males fed on fish based diet, MM – males fed on milk based diet, FS – females fed on standard diet, FF – females fed on fish based diet, and FM – females fed on milk based diet
Fig. 2The amount of cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol and triglicerides in the blood plasma. Data are given as mean ± SE (n = 6). Results were tested by two-way ANOVA with sex (S) and diet (D) factors (p significance was showed) and post hoc tested by Tukey’s HSD. *** - p < 0.001, ** - p < 0.01, * - p < 0.05. MS – males fed on standard diet, MF – males fed on fish based diet, MM – males fed on milk based diet, FS – females fed on standard diet, FF – females fed on fish based diet, and FM – females fed on milk based diet
Fig. 3Saturated fatty acids, monounsaturated fatty acids and polyunsaturated fatty acids percentage in liver. Data are given as mean ± SE (n = 6). Results were tested by two-way ANOVA with sex (S) and diet (D) factors (p significance was showed) and post hoc tested by Tukey’s HSD. *** - p < 0.001, ** - p < 0.01, * - p < 0.05. MS – males fed on standard diet, MF – males fed on fish based diet, MM – males fed on milk based diet, FS – females fed on standard diet, FF – females fed on fish based diet, and FM – females fed on milk based diet
Fig. 4The percentage of palmitic acid, palmitoleic, stearic, oleic vaccenic and linoleic acid in liver. Data are given as mean ± SE (n = 6). Results were tested by two-way ANOVA with sex (S) and diet (D) factors (p significance was showed) and post hoc tested by Tukey’s HSD. *** - p < 0.001, ** - p < 0.01, * - p < 0.05. MS – males fed on standard diet, MF – males fed on fish based diet, MM – males fed on milk based diet, FS – females fed on standard diet, FF – females fed on fish based diet, and FM – females fed on milk based diet
Fig. 5The percentage of ETA, AA, EPA, DTA, DPA and DHA in liver. Results were tested by two-way ANOVA with sex (S) and diet (D) factors (p significance was showed) and post hoc tested by Tukey’s HSD. *** - p < 0.001, ** - p < 0.01, * - p < 0.05. MS – males fed on standard diet, MF – males fed on fish based diet, MM – males fed on milk based diet, FS – females fed on standard diet, FF – females fed on fish based diet, and FM – females fed on milk based diet
Fig. 6Fatty acids ratio (n-6/n-3) in liver of female and male rats. Data are given as mean ± SE (n = 6). Results were tested by two-way ANOVA with sex (S) and diet (D) factors (p significance was showed) and post hoc tested by Tukey’s HSD. *** - p < 0.001, ** - p < 0.01, * - p < 0.05. MS – males fed on standard diet, MF – males fed on fish based diet, MM – males fed on milk based diet, FS – females fed on standard diet, FF – females fed on fish based diet, and FM – females fed on milk based diet
Fig. 7The estimated activities of desaturases 5, 6 and 9 and elongase in the liver. Data are given as mean ± SD. Results were tested by two-way ANOVA with sex (S) and diet (D) factors (F values and p significance are showed) and post hoc analyzed by Tukey’s HSD. *** - p < 0.001, ** - p < 0.01, * - p < 0.05. MS – males fed on standard diet, MF – males fed on fish based diet, MM – males fed on milk based diet, FS – females fed on standard diet, FF – females fed on fish based diet, and FM – females fed on milk based diet
Fig. 8Canonical discriminant anlysis of SFA and MUFA composition in rats fed with different diet. Data are expressed as mean of canonical variables ± SE. MS – males fed on standard diet, MF – males fed on fish based diet, MM – males fed on milk based diet, FS – females fed on standard diet, FF – females fed on fish based diet, and FM – females fed on milk based diet
Fig. 9Canonical discriminant anlysis of PUFA composition in males and females fed with different diet. Data are expressed as mean of canonical variables ± SE. MS – males fed on standard diet, MF – males fed on fish based diet, MM – males fed on milk based diet, FS – females fed on standard diet, FF – females fed on fish based diet, and FM – females fed on milk based diet