Literature DB >> 28525785

Denitrifying woodchip bioreactor and phosphorus filter pairing to minimize pollution swapping.

Laura E Christianson1, Christine Lepine2, Philip L Sibrell3, Chad Penn4, Steven T Summerfelt2.   

Abstract

Pairing denitrifying woodchip bioreactors and phosphorus-sorbing filters provides a unique, engineered approach for dual nutrient removal from waters impaired with both nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P). This column study aimed to test placement of two P-filter media (acid mine drainage treatment residuals and steel slag) relative to a denitrifying system to maximize N and P removal and minimize pollution swapping under varying flow conditions (i.e., woodchip column hydraulic retention times (HRTs) of 7.2, 18, and 51 h; P-filter HRTs of 7.6-59 min). Woodchip denitrification columns were placed either upstream or downstream of P-filters filled with either medium. The configuration with woodchip denitrifying systems placed upstream of the P-filters generally provided optimized dissolved P removal efficiencies and removal rates. The P-filters placed upstream of the woodchip columns exhibited better P removal than downstream-placed P-filters only under overly long (i.e., N-limited) retention times when highly reduced effluent exited the woodchip bioreactors. The paired configurations using mine drainage residuals provided significantly greater P removal than the steel slag P-filters (e.g., 25-133 versus 8.8-48 g P removed m-3 filter media d-1, respectively), but there were no significant differences in N removal between treatments (removal rates: 8.0-18 g N removed m-3 woodchips d-1; N removal efficiencies: 18-95% across all HRTs). The range of HRTs tested here resulted in various undesirable pollution swapping by-products from the denitrifying bioreactors: nitrite production when nitrate removal was not complete and sulfate reduction, chemical oxygen demand production and decreased pH during overly long retention times. The downstream P-filter placement provided a polishing step for removal of chemical oxygen demand and nitrite.
Copyright © 2017 The Conservation Fund. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Denitrification; Nitrate; Phosphorus; Sorption; Woodchip

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28525785     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.05.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  2 in total

1.  Nitrifying trickling filters and denitrifying bioreactors for nitrogen management of high-strength anaerobic digestion effluent.

Authors:  Aaron A Forbis-Stokes; Lucas Rocha-Melogno; Marc A Deshusses
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 7.086

Review 2.  Efficiency of mitigation measures targeting nutrient losses from agricultural drainage systems: A review.

Authors:  Mette Vodder Carstensen; Fatemeh Hashemi; Carl Christian Hoffmann; Dominik Zak; Joachim Audet; Brian Kronvang
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 5.129

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.