Literature DB >> 28525540

Alcohol Consumption and Common Carotid Intima-Media Thickness: The USE-IMT Study.

Annie R Britton1, Diederick E Grobbee2,3, Hester M den Ruijter4, Todd J Anderson5, Moise Desvarieux6, Gunnar Engström7, Greg W Evans8, Bo Hedblad7, Jussi Kauhanen9, Sudhir Kurl9, Eva M Lonn10, Ellisiv B Mathiesen3, Joseph F Polak11, Jacqueline F Price12, Christopher M Rembold13, Maria Rosvall7, Tatjana Rundek14, Jukka T Salonen15, Coen Stehouwer16, Tomi-Pekka Tuomainen9, Michiel L Bots2.   

Abstract

AIMS: Epidemiological evidence indicates a protective effect of light to moderate alcohol consumption compared to non-drinking and heavy drinking. Although several mechanisms have been suggested, the effect of alcohol on atherosclerotic changes in vessel walls is unclear. Therefore, we explored the relationship between alcohol consumption and common carotid intima media thickness, a marker of early atherosclerosis in the general population.
METHODS: Individual participant data from eight cohorts, involving 37,494 individuals from the USE-IMT collaboration were used. Multilevel age and sex adjusted linear regression models were applied to estimate mean differences in common carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) with alcohol consumption.
RESULTS: The mean age was 57.9 years (SD 8.6) and the mean CIMT was 0.75 mm (SD 0.177). About, 40.5% reported no alcohol consumed, and among those who drank, mean consumption was 13.3 g per day (SD 16.4). Those consuming no alcohol or a very small amount (<5 g per day) had significantly lower common CIMT values than those consuming >10 g per day, after adjusting for a range of confounding factors.
CONCLUSION: In this large CIMT consortium, we did not find evidence to support a protective effect of alcohol on CIMT.
© The Author 2017. Medical Council on Alcohol and Oxford University Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28525540      PMCID: PMC5860521          DOI: 10.1093/alcalc/agx028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol        ISSN: 0735-0414            Impact factor:   2.826


INTRODUCTION

Alcohol consumption is one of the biggest public health challenges facing modern society. It is associated with a large range of health conditions and ranks as the fifth leading risk factor for disease and injury worldwide (Lim ). The relationship between alcohol and cardiovascular disease (CVD) is complex. Epidemiological evidence indicates a protective effect of light to moderate alcohol consumption compared to non-drinking and an increased risk of cardiovascular events amongst heavier drinkers (Corrao ; Silverwood ). However, it has been argued that the protective effect observed in observational studies may in part be due to misclassification errors, reporting biases and residual confounding (Stockwell ). It is, therefore, crucial to explore the biological mechanisms underlying the association between alcohol intake and CVD to help determine causality. These mechanisms are not fully elucidated and are likely to be complex, involving both acute and chronic effects and beneficial and harmful outcomes (Mathews ). Suggested chronic effects of alcohol on the vascular system include favourable changes in lipid profile and other cardiovascular biomarkers (Brien ), as well as deleterious changes in arterial hypertension, peripheral artery disease and atherosclerosis (Fernández-Solà, 2015; Mathews ). The effect of alcohol on atherosclerotic changes in vessel walls is disputed (Kim ). Some studies have found evidence of a J-shaped (Schminke ; Lee ; Xie ; Bauer ) or positive relationship (Zyriax ; Britton ). Other studies report no association (Mowbray ; Djoussé ; Zureik ) or an inverse linear trend (Lee ). To address the relationship of alcohol consumption and carotid atherosclerosis in multiple populations, we used data from the USE-IMT consortium (Den Ruijter ) that collected individual level carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) and clinical data from multiple cohorts. We assessed CIMT as an intermediate phenotype of early atherosclerosis and a marker of subclinical organ damage that independently predicts vascular events (Lorenz ).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study population

Baseline data were from the USE-IMT collaboration, an individual participant data meta-analysis established to determine the incremental value of CIMT in predicting cardiovascular events (Den Ruijter ). Population-based prospective cohort studies conducted with data on cardiovascular risk factors, common CIMT, and follow-up for cardiovascular events were identified through systematic literature searches and expert recommendation. In the present analysis, we included 37,494 individuals from eight studies in North America and Europe of whom information on alcohol intake was available (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities, Edinburgh Artery Study, Kuopio Ischemic Heart Disease Risk Factor Study, Malmo Diet and Cancer Study, Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis, Northern Manhattan Study, Tromso Study, and Whitehall II Study).

Variables

Current alcohol consumption was measured in the individual cohorts by self-report questionnaire. Information was harmonized into grams per day and categorized at 0 g; from 0 to 4 g; from 5 to 9 g, from 10 to 19 g; from 20 to 29 g and from 30 g or over. Smoking status was ascertained from self-report questionnaires and defined as current, never or former smoking. For each individual, body mass index (BMI) was calculated from measured body weight (in kilograms) divided by measured height (in metres) squared. High blood pressure was defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥90 mmHg. Serum cholesterol was measured as total cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels. History of CVD and presence of diabetes mellitus were defined using the definitions of the individual cohorts, i.e. based on questionnaire information, and /or use of blood glucose lowering medication or fasting glucose level (den Ruijter ).

Statistical analysis

In order to standardize the common CIMT measurements, we rescaled CIMT levels using the method described by Engelen . We derived a linear regression model in the whole cohort with common CIMT as a function of cardiovascular risk factors (age, sex, blood pressure, diabetes, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, smoking and antihypertensive drug use) and a dummy variable for study. The reference study was the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study (ARIC). Subsequently, for every individual in a cohort, we subtracted the measured CIMT with the regression coefficient of that cohort. In that sense, we adjusted for the variability between individuals that can be attributed to being in a certain cohort study, all relative to the ARIC results. The relationship between alcohol consumption and common CIMT was evaluated using linear regression models, adjusting for age, sex, smoking, medical history and medication, blood pressure, BMI and serum cholesterol. Separate analyses were also run by sex. Mean differences in common CIMT by increase in alcohol intake category were obtained with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), using the group with 10–19 g per day intake as reference group. This reference group was chosen in preference to the non-drinking group, as the latter consists of a mix of former drinkers and current abstainers. To study the relation between alcohol and more severe vascular abnormalities, we divided the population into those with a common CIMT >0.90 mm and those without.

RESULTS

The mean age of the combined cohorts was 57.9 years (SD 8.6) and the mean CIMT was 0.75 mm (SD 0.177). Of the combined cohorts, 40.5% reported no alcohol consumed, and among those who drank, mean consumption was 13.3 g per day (SD 16.4). There was no evidence of a J-shape or U-shaped relationship between alcohol consumption and CIMT (Fig. 1). In a fully adjusted model, compared to the reference group, i.e. those with an intake ranging from 10 to 19 g per day, those with no alcohol intake had significantly lower common CIMT values (mean difference −0.029 mm 95% CI −0.030; −0.024) and those with 1–4 g intake per day had a 0.01 mm lower common CIMT (Table 1). Those with the higher intakes than the reference groups had similar common CIMT values (Fig. 1). Similarly, a common CIMT above 0.90 mm was significantly less common in the no drinkers and lightest drinkers compared to the reference group. The results were similar when performed separately for men and women.
Fig. 1.

Relationship between alcohol consumption and common CIMT, adjusted for age, sex, medical history and medication, smoking, blood pressure, BMI and serum cholesterol.

Table 1.

Mean difference in CIMT (mm) by alcohol consumption group (reference 10–19 g per day)

Alcohol group (grams per day)Adjusted mean difference95% CI
0−0.029−0.030, −0.024
>0–4−0.010−0.016, −0.004
5–90.003−0.003, 0.009
10–19
20–290.003−0.005, 0.011
30+−0.005−0.013, 0.002

Adjusted for age, sex, history CVD, SBP, DBP, hypertension medication, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, lipid lowering drugs, diabetes, BMI and smoking.

Mean difference in CIMT (mm) by alcohol consumption group (reference 10–19 g per day) Adjusted for age, sex, history CVD, SBP, DBP, hypertension medication, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, lipid lowering drugs, diabetes, BMI and smoking. Relationship between alcohol consumption and common CIMT, adjusted for age, sex, medical history and medication, smoking, blood pressure, BMI and serum cholesterol.

DISCUSSION

We found no evidence of a protective effect of alcohol consumption on the arterial wall thickness assessed by an ultrasonic measure of common CIMT in a pooled study of 37,494 individuals from the general populations in Europe and the US. The lowest CIMT levels were reported for those who currently consumed no alcohol. Therefore, our findings do not support a protective vascular effect of moderate alcohol consumption that is mediated through an atherosclerotic pathway. This is in agreement with other studies that found no marked relationship of alcohol and CIMT (Mowbray ; Djoussé ; Zureik ) or a positive relationship (Mowbray ; Djoussé ; Zureik ; Zyriax ; Britton ). Others have found a U-shaped relationship between alcohol and CIMT in cross-sectional analyses. For example, in the Cardiovascular Health Study investigating subjects over 65 years, consumers of 1–6 drinks per week (equalling <15 g/d) had a carotid IMT 0.07 mm lower than abstainers, whereas consumers of 14 or more drinks (equalling >30 g/d) had an IMT 0.07 mm higher than abstainers (Mukamal ). The disagreement in findings requires further investigation. Possible explanations include different adjustments for confounders, patterns of consumption, types of beverages and different choices of reference groups. The strength of this current study was our ability to harmonize across eight studies to pool data on >37,000 participants. This gave us sufficient power to detect differences in CIMT by drinking group and our results are generalizable across European and North American populations. However, the study is cross-sectional and we were not able to separate former drinkers from the current non-drinkers. Furthermore, we were not able to look at pattern of drinking or beverage type. In conclusion, we do not find evidence to support a protective effect of alcohol on CIMT, a marker of subclinical CVD.
  22 in total

1.  Carotid intima-media thickness progression to predict cardiovascular events in the general population (the PROG-IMT collaborative project): a meta-analysis of individual participant data.

Authors:  Matthias W Lorenz; Joseph F Polak; Maryam Kavousi; Ellisiv B Mathiesen; Henry Völzke; Tomi-Pekka Tuomainen; Dirk Sander; Matthieu Plichart; Alberico L Catapano; Christine M Robertson; Stefan Kiechl; Tatjana Rundek; Moïse Desvarieux; Lars Lind; Caroline Schmid; Pronabesh DasMahapatra; Lu Gao; Kathrin Ziegelbauer; Michiel L Bots; Simon G Thompson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  How good is the science?

Authors:  T Stockwell; A Greer; K Fillmore; T Chikritzhs; C Zeisser
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-03-27

3.  Association between alcohol consumption and subclinical carotid atherosclerosis: the Study of Health in Pomerania.

Authors:  Ulf Schminke; Jan Luedemann; Klaus Berger; Dietrich Alte; Rolf Mitusch; William G Wood; Anke Jaschinski; Sven Barnow; Ulrich John; Christof Kessler
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2005-07-07       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 4.  Cardiovascular risks and benefits of moderate and heavy alcohol consumption.

Authors:  Joaquim Fernández-Solà
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 32.419

5.  A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010.

Authors:  Stephen S Lim; Theo Vos; Abraham D Flaxman; Goodarz Danaei; Kenji Shibuya; Heather Adair-Rohani; Markus Amann; H Ross Anderson; Kathryn G Andrews; Martin Aryee; Charles Atkinson; Loraine J Bacchus; Adil N Bahalim; Kalpana Balakrishnan; John Balmes; Suzanne Barker-Collo; Amanda Baxter; Michelle L Bell; Jed D Blore; Fiona Blyth; Carissa Bonner; Guilherme Borges; Rupert Bourne; Michel Boussinesq; Michael Brauer; Peter Brooks; Nigel G Bruce; Bert Brunekreef; Claire Bryan-Hancock; Chiara Bucello; Rachelle Buchbinder; Fiona Bull; Richard T Burnett; Tim E Byers; Bianca Calabria; Jonathan Carapetis; Emily Carnahan; Zoe Chafe; Fiona Charlson; Honglei Chen; Jian Shen Chen; Andrew Tai-Ann Cheng; Jennifer Christine Child; Aaron Cohen; K Ellicott Colson; Benjamin C Cowie; Sarah Darby; Susan Darling; Adrian Davis; Louisa Degenhardt; Frank Dentener; Don C Des Jarlais; Karen Devries; Mukesh Dherani; Eric L Ding; E Ray Dorsey; Tim Driscoll; Karen Edmond; Suad Eltahir Ali; Rebecca E Engell; Patricia J Erwin; Saman Fahimi; Gail Falder; Farshad Farzadfar; Alize Ferrari; Mariel M Finucane; Seth Flaxman; Francis Gerry R Fowkes; Greg Freedman; Michael K Freeman; Emmanuela Gakidou; Santu Ghosh; Edward Giovannucci; Gerhard Gmel; Kathryn Graham; Rebecca Grainger; Bridget Grant; David Gunnell; Hialy R Gutierrez; Wayne Hall; Hans W Hoek; Anthony Hogan; H Dean Hosgood; Damian Hoy; Howard Hu; Bryan J Hubbell; Sally J Hutchings; Sydney E Ibeanusi; Gemma L Jacklyn; Rashmi Jasrasaria; Jost B Jonas; Haidong Kan; John A Kanis; Nicholas Kassebaum; Norito Kawakami; Young-Ho Khang; Shahab Khatibzadeh; Jon-Paul Khoo; Cindy Kok; Francine Laden; Ratilal Lalloo; Qing Lan; Tim Lathlean; Janet L Leasher; James Leigh; Yang Li; John Kent Lin; Steven E Lipshultz; Stephanie London; Rafael Lozano; Yuan Lu; Joelle Mak; Reza Malekzadeh; Leslie Mallinger; Wagner Marcenes; Lyn March; Robin Marks; Randall Martin; Paul McGale; John McGrath; Sumi Mehta; George A Mensah; Tony R Merriman; Renata Micha; Catherine Michaud; Vinod Mishra; Khayriyyah Mohd Hanafiah; Ali A Mokdad; Lidia Morawska; Dariush Mozaffarian; Tasha Murphy; Mohsen Naghavi; Bruce Neal; Paul K Nelson; Joan Miquel Nolla; Rosana Norman; Casey Olives; Saad B Omer; Jessica Orchard; Richard Osborne; Bart Ostro; Andrew Page; Kiran D Pandey; Charles D H Parry; Erin Passmore; Jayadeep Patra; Neil Pearce; Pamela M Pelizzari; Max Petzold; Michael R Phillips; Dan Pope; C Arden Pope; John Powles; Mayuree Rao; Homie Razavi; Eva A Rehfuess; Jürgen T Rehm; Beate Ritz; Frederick P Rivara; Thomas Roberts; Carolyn Robinson; Jose A Rodriguez-Portales; Isabelle Romieu; Robin Room; Lisa C Rosenfeld; Ananya Roy; Lesley Rushton; Joshua A Salomon; Uchechukwu Sampson; Lidia Sanchez-Riera; Ella Sanman; Amir Sapkota; Soraya Seedat; Peilin Shi; Kevin Shield; Rupak Shivakoti; Gitanjali M Singh; David A Sleet; Emma Smith; Kirk R Smith; Nicolas J C Stapelberg; Kyle Steenland; Heidi Stöckl; Lars Jacob Stovner; Kurt Straif; Lahn Straney; George D Thurston; Jimmy H Tran; Rita Van Dingenen; Aaron van Donkelaar; J Lennert Veerman; Lakshmi Vijayakumar; Robert Weintraub; Myrna M Weissman; Richard A White; Harvey Whiteford; Steven T Wiersma; James D Wilkinson; Hywel C Williams; Warwick Williams; Nicholas Wilson; Anthony D Woolf; Paul Yip; Jan M Zielinski; Alan D Lopez; Christopher J L Murray; Majid Ezzati; Mohammad A AlMazroa; Ziad A Memish
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Comparison of factors associated with carotid intima-media thickness in the Multi-ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) and the Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study (HNR).

Authors:  Marcus Bauer; Joseph A C Delaney; Stefan Möhlenkamp; Karl-Heinz Jöckel; Richard A Kronmal; Nils Lehmann; Kenneth J Mukamal; Susanne Moebus; Joseph F Polak; Nico Dragano; Matthew J Budoff; Raimund Erbel; Robyn L McClelland
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2013-04-20       Impact factor: 5.251

7.  A meta-analysis of alcohol consumption and the risk of 15 diseases.

Authors:  Giovanni Corrao; Vincenzo Bagnardi; Antonella Zambon; Carlo La Vecchia
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.018

8.  Reference intervals for common carotid intima-media thickness measured with echotracking: relation with risk factors.

Authors:  Lian Engelen; Isabel Ferreira; Coen D Stehouwer; Pierre Boutouyrie; Stéphane Laurent
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 9.  The mechanism by which moderate alcohol consumption influences coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Marc J Mathews; Leon Liebenberg; Edward H Mathews
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 3.271

10.  Testing for non-linear causal effects using a binary genotype in a Mendelian randomization study: application to alcohol and cardiovascular traits.

Authors:  Richard J Silverwood; Michael V Holmes; Caroline E Dale; Debbie A Lawlor; John C Whittaker; George Davey Smith; David A Leon; Tom Palmer; Brendan J Keating; Luisa Zuccolo; Juan P Casas; Frank Dudbridge
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 7.196

View more
  3 in total

1.  Classical Cardiovascular Risk Factors and HIV are Associated With Carotid Intima-Media Thickness in Adults From Sub-Saharan Africa: Findings From H3Africa AWI-Gen Study.

Authors:  Engelbert A Nonterah; Palwende R Boua; Kerstin Klipstein-Grobusch; Gershim Asiki; Lisa K Micklesfield; Godfred Agongo; Stuart A Ali; Felistas Mashinya; Herman Sorgho; Seydou Nakanabo-Diallo; Cornelius Debpuur; Catherine Kyobutungi; Marianne Alberts; Shane Norris; Stephen Tollman; Halidou Tinto; Cassandra C Soo; Freedom Mukomana; Scott Hazelhurst; Alisha N Wade; Kathleen Kahn; Abraham R Oduro; Diederick E Grobbee; Osman Sankoh; Michèle Ramsay; Michiel L Bots; Nigel J Crowther
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-07-13       Impact factor: 5.501

2.  Regional and demographic variations of Carotid artery Intima and Media Thickness (CIMT): A Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  V Abeysuriya; B P R Perera; A R Wickremasinghe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Alcohol consumption in relation to carotid subclinical atherosclerosis and its progression: results from a European longitudinal multicentre study.

Authors:  Federica Laguzzi; Damiano Baldassarre; Fabrizio Veglia; Rona J Strawbridge; Steve E Humphries; Rainer Rauramaa; Andries J Smit; Philippe Giral; Angela Silveira; Elena Tremoli; Anders Hamsten; Ulf de Faire; Paolo Frumento; Karin Leander
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 5.614

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.