Literature DB >> 28524258

Cardiotocography interpretation skills and the association with size of maternity unit, years of obstetric work experience and healthcare professional background: a national cross-sectional study.

Line Thellesen1, Jette L Sorensen1, Morten Hedegaard1, Susanne Rosthoej2, Nina P Colov1, Kristine S Andersen1, Thomas Bergholt1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to examine whether cardiotocography (CTG) knowledge, interpretation skills and decision-making measured by a written assessment were associated with size of maternity unit, years of obstetric work experience and healthcare professional background.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A national cross-sectional study in the setting of a CTG teaching intervention involving all 24 maternity units in Denmark. Participants were midwives (n = 1260) and specialists (n = 269) and residents (n = 142) in obstetrics and gynecology who attended a 1-day CTG course and answered a 30-item multiple-choice question test. Associations between mean test score and work conditions were analyzed using multivariable robust regression, in which the three variables were mutually adjusted.
RESULTS: Participants from units with > 3000 deliveries/year scored higher on the test than participants from units with < 1000 deliveries/year (3000-3999 deliveries/year: mean difference 0.8, p < 0.0001; > 4000 deliveries/year: mean difference 0.5, p = 0.006). Participants with < 15 years of work experience scored higher than participants with > 15 years of experience (15-20 years of experience: mean difference - 0.6, p = 0.007; > 20 years experience: mean difference - 0.9, p < 0.0001). No differences were detected concerning professional background.
CONCLUSIONS: CTG knowledge, interpretation skills and decision-making measured by a written assessment were positively associated with working in large maternity units and having < 15 years of obstetric work experience. This might indicate a challenge in maintaining CTG skills in small units and among experienced staff but could also reflect different levels of motivation, test familiarity and learning culture. Whether the findings are transferable to the clinical setting was not examined.
© 2017 Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assessment; cardiotocography; continuing professional development; electronic fetal monitoring; inter-professional education; multiple-choice questions

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28524258     DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6349            Impact factor:   3.636


  3 in total

1.  IMproving the practice of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate MOnitoring with cardiotocography for safer childbirth (the IMMO programme): protocol for a qualitative study.

Authors:  Guillaume Lamé; Elisa Liberati; Jenni Burt; Tim Draycott; Cathy Winter; James Ward; Mary Dixon-Woods
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  How common is substandard obstetric care in adverse events of birth asphyxia, shoulder dystocia and postpartum hemorrhage? Findings from an external inspection of Norwegian maternity units.

Authors:  Lars T Johansen; Geir Sverre Braut; Ganesh Acharya; Jan Fredrik Andresen; Pål Øian
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 3.636

3.  How often will midwives and obstetricians experience obstetric emergencies or high-risk deliveries: a national cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Stinne Høgh; Line Thellesen; Thomas Bergholt; Ane Lilleøre Rom; Marianne Johansen; Jette Led Sorensen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 2.692

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.