Literature DB >> 28524243

Bulk-filled posterior resin restorations based on stress-decreasing resin technology: a randomized, controlled 6-year evaluation.

Jan W V van Dijken1, Ulla Pallesen2.   

Abstract

This randomized study evaluated a flowable resin composite bulk-fill technique in posterior restorations and compared it intraindividually with a conventional 2-mm resin composite layering technique over a 6-yr follow-up period. Thirty-eight pairs of Class II restorations and 15 pairs of Class I restorations were placed in 38 adults. In all cavities a single-step self-etch adhesive (Xeno V) was applied. In the first cavity of each pair, the flowable resin composite (SDR) was placed, in bulk increments of up to 4 mm. The occlusal part was completed with a layer of nanohybrid resin composite (Ceram X mono). In the second cavity of each pair, the hybrid resin composite was placed in 2-mm increments. The restorations were evaluated using slightly modified US Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria at baseline and then annually for a time period of 6 yr. After 6 yr, 72 Class II restorations and 26 Class I restorations could be evaluated. Six failed Class II molar restorations, three in each group, were observed, resulting in a success rate of 93.9% for all restorations and an annual failure rate (AFR) of 1.0% for both groups. The AFR for Class II and Class I restorations in both groups was 1.4% and 0%, respectively. The main reason for failure was resin composite fracture.
© 2017 Eur J Oral Sci.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bulk-fill; clinical; composite resin; posterior; self-etch adhesive

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28524243     DOI: 10.1111/eos.12351

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci        ISSN: 0909-8836            Impact factor:   2.612


  14 in total

1.  Thirty-six-month clinical evaluation of posterior high-viscosity bulk-fill resin composite restorations in a high caries incidence population: interim results of a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Márcia de Almeida Durão; Ana Karina Maciel de Andrade; Amanda Maciel do Prado; Sirley Raiane Mamede Veloso; Lynn Morena Tavares Maciel; Marcos Antônio Japiassú Resende Montes; Gabriela Queiroz de Melo Monteiro
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  One-year clinical evaluation of bulk-fill flowable vs. regular nanofilled composite in non-carious cervical lesions.

Authors:  Gabriela D Canali; Sergio A Ignácio; Rodrigo N Rached; Evelise M Souza
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Fracture strength of extended class I composite restorations with different restorative techniques.

Authors:  Brenda S Leyton; Rodrigo N Rached; Sergio A Ignácio; Evelise M Souza
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 2.634

Review 4.  Use of flowable resin composite as an intermediate layer in class II restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Cleber Paradzinski Cavalheiro; Helena Scherer; José Carlos Pettorossi Imparato; Fabrício Mezzomo Collares; Tathiane Larissa Lenzi
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 3.606

5.  The light-curing unit: An essential piece of dental equipment.

Authors:  Richard B Price; Jack L Ferracane; Reinhard Hickel; Braden Sullivan
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 2.607

Review 6.  Is the clinical performance of composite resin restorations in posterior teeth similar if restored with incremental or bulk-filling techniques? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Patrícia Valéria Manozzo Kunz; Letícia Maíra Wambier; Marina da Rosa Kaizer; Gisele Maria Correr; Alessandra Reis; Carla Castiglia Gonzaga
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 3.606

7.  Randomized prospective clinical trial of class II restorations using flowable bulk-fill resin composites: 4-year follow-up.

Authors:  Isis Almela Endo Hoshino; André Luiz Fraga Briso; Lara Maria Bueno Esteves; Paulo Henrique Dos Santos; Sandra Meira Borghi Frascino; Ticiane Cestari Fagundes
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 3.606

8.  Sufficiency of curing in high-viscosity bulk-fill resin composites with enhanced opacity.

Authors:  Nicoleta Ilie
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Six-year clinical evaluation of bulk-fill and nanofill resin composite restorations.

Authors:  Ayse Ruya Yazici; Zeynep Bilge Kutuk; Esra Ergin; Sevilay Karahan; Sibel A Antonson
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  Clinical Performance of Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Restorations Using the United States Public Health Service and Federation Dentaire Internationale Criteria: A 12-Month Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Márcia de Almeida Durão; Ana Karina Maciel de Andrade; Maria do Carmo Moreira da Silva Santos; Marcos Antônio Japiassú Resende Montes; Gabriela Queiroz de Melo Monteiro
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2020-11-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.