Literature DB >> 28523981

Classification of lunge biomechanics with multiple and individual inertial measurement units.

Martin A O'Reilly1,2, Darragh F Whelan1,2, Tomas E Ward3, Eamonn Delahunt2, Brian Caulfield1,2.   

Abstract

Lunges are a common, compound lower limb resistance exercise. If completed with aberrant technique, the increased stress on the joints used may increase risk of injury. This study sought to first investigate the ability of inertial measurement units (IMUs), when used in isolation and combination, to (a) classify acceptable and aberrant lunge technique (b) classify exact deviations in lunge technique. We then sought to investigate the most important features and establish the minimum number of top-ranked features and decision trees that are needed to maintain maximal system classification efficacy. Eighty volunteers performed the lunge with acceptable form and 11 deviations. Five IMUs positioned on the lumbar spine, thighs, and shanks recorded these movements. Time and frequency domain features were extracted from the IMU data and used to train and test a variety of classifiers. A single-IMU system achieved 83% accuracy, 62% sensitivity, and 90% specificity in binary classification and a five-IMU system achieved 90% accuracy, 80% sensitivity, and 92% specificity. A five-IMU set-up can also detect specific deviations with 70% accuracy. System efficiency was improved and classification quality was maintained when using only 20% of the top-ranked features for training and testing classifiers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Wearable sensors; biomedical technology; inertial measurement units; lower extremity

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28523981     DOI: 10.1080/14763141.2017.1314544

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sports Biomech        ISSN: 1476-3141            Impact factor:   2.832


  7 in total

Review 1.  Wearable Inertial Sensor Systems for Lower Limb Exercise Detection and Evaluation: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Martin O'Reilly; Brian Caulfield; Tomas Ward; William Johnston; Cailbhe Doherty
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Classification of Plank Techniques Using Wearable Sensors.

Authors:  Zong-Rong Chen; Wei-Chi Tsai; Shih-Feng Huang; Tzu-Yi Li; Chen-Yi Song
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 3.  Human Movement Quality Assessment Using Sensor Technologies in Recreational and Professional Sports: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Verena Venek; Stefan Kranzinger; Hermann Schwameder; Thomas Stöggl
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 3.847

4.  A Wearable Sensor-Based Exercise Biofeedback System: Mixed Methods Evaluation of Formulift.

Authors:  Martin Aidan O'Reilly; Patrick Slevin; Tomas Ward; Brian Caulfield
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 4.773

5.  Supervised Machine Learning Applied to Wearable Sensor Data Can Accurately Classify Functional Fitness Exercises Within a Continuous Workout.

Authors:  Ezio Preatoni; Stefano Nodari; Nicola Francesco Lopomo
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-07-07

6.  Recognition and Repetition Counting for Local Muscular Endurance Exercises in Exercise-Based Rehabilitation: A Comparative Study Using Artificial Intelligence Models.

Authors:  Ghanashyama Prabhu; Noel E O'Connor; Kieran Moran
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  The Importance of Real-World Validation of Machine Learning Systems in Wearable Exercise Biofeedback Platforms: A Case Study.

Authors:  Rob Argent; Antonio Bevilacqua; Alison Keogh; Ailish Daly; Brian Caulfield
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 3.576

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.