Literature DB >> 28523609

Cardiorespiratory responses and myocardial function within incremental exercise in healthy unmedicated older vs. young men and women.

Paulo Farinatti1,2, Walace Monteiro3,4, Ricardo Oliveira3,5, Antonio Crisafulli6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Age-related differences concerning cardiorespiratory responses and myocardial function during exercise have not been extensively investigated in healthy populations. AIMS: To compare cardiorespiratory performance and myocardial function during maximal exercise in healthy/unmedicated men (older, n = 24, 63-75 years; young, n = 22, 19-25 years) and women (older, n = 18, age = 63-74 years; young, n = 23, 19-25 years).
METHODS: Oxygen uptake (VO2), ventilation minute (V E), heart rate (HR), stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (Q), O2 pulse (O2p), preejection period (PEP), and left ventricular ejection time (LVET) were assessed during cycle incremental exercise.
RESULTS: HR and SV remained equivalent between age groups until 75 and 50% peak workload, respectively. Q increased by 2.5 and 4.5 times in older and young groups, respectively. However, Q/VO2 ratio was always similar across age and sex groups (∼0.50). The energetic efficiency ratio (W/VO2) was also alike in older and young men, but slightly lower in women. At maximal exercise, cardiorespiratory responses were lower in older than young men and women: VO2 (-40 to 50%), V E (-35 to 37%), HR (-23%), SV (-26 to 29%), Q (-43 to 45%), and O2p (-15 to 20%). Cardiac and SV indices were lower in older than young groups by approximately 42 and 25%, respectively. LVET was longer in the older individuals, while PEP was similar across age groups. Hence, PEP/LVET was lowered among older vs. young men and women.
CONCLUSION: Submaximal work capacity was preserved in healthy and unmedicated older individuals. Age-related lessening of maximal performance in both sexes was due to poor chronotropic and, particularly, inotropic properties of the heart.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aerobic exercise; Aging; Fitness; Health; Inotropism; Thoracic impedance

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28523609     DOI: 10.1007/s40520-017-0776-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res        ISSN: 1594-0667            Impact factor:   3.636


  5 in total

1.  Cardiorespiratory response to exercise in endurance-trained premenopausal and postmenopausal females.

Authors:  Beatriz Rael; Laura Barba-Moreno; Nuria Romero-Parra; Víctor M Alfaro-Magallanes; Eliane A Castro; Rocío Cupeiro; Ana B Peinado
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 2.  Physical activity, exercise, and chronic diseases: A brief review.

Authors:  Elizabeth Anderson; J Larry Durstine
Journal:  Sports Med Health Sci       Date:  2019-09-10

Review 3.  Gender Differences in Hemodynamic Regulation and Cardiovascular Adaptations to Dynamic Exercise.

Authors:  Pier P Bassareo; Antonio Crisafulli
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2020

4.  Systolic and diastolic function during cycling at the respiratory threshold between elderly and young healthy individuals.

Authors:  Sara Magnani; Gabriele Mulliri; Silvana Roberto; Giovanna Ghiani; Fabio Sechi; Silvia Stagi; Elisabetta Marini; Pier Paolo Bassareo; Marty D Spranger; Antonio Crisafulli
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Small intra-individual variability of the pre-ejection period justifies the use of pulse transit time as approximation of the vascular transit.

Authors:  Minke C Kortekaas; Marit H N van Velzen; Frank Grüne; Sjoerd P Niehof; Robert J Stolker; Frank J P M Huygen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.