Sayaka Kato1, Misae Ito2,3, Kimiya Shimizu2,3, Kazutaka Kamiya4. 1. Eye Center, Sanno Hospital, 8-10-16 Akasaka, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 107-0052, Japan. sayaka331010843@yahoo.co.jp. 2. Eye Center, Sanno Hospital, 8-10-16 Akasaka, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 107-0052, Japan. 3. International University of Health and Welfare, Tochigi, Japan. 4. Kitasato University, Kanagawa, Japan.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the etiology and the clinical outcomes of secondary surgical interventions for dissatisfied patients after pseudophakic monovision. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Kitasato University Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: This study comprised 12 eyes in 12 patients (age 66.2 ± 5.6 years) who underwent photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) enhancement to improve their dissatisfaction after pseudophakic monovision. We quantitatively assessed the visual and refractive outcomes and the subjective satisfaction measured using a visual analog scale, that ranged from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 10 (very satisfied), before and 3 months after PRK enhancement. RESULTS: Six (50%) of the 12 patients were dissatisfied with their various distance visions because of a large amount of anisometropia (≥2.50 D). Two (16.7%) were dissatisfied with their distance vision after conventional monovision because of residual cylindrical errors (≥0.75 D) in the dominant eye. Three (25%) was an unknown origin. The remaining one of the 12 patients was dissatisfied due to the unadaptability to crossed monovision. Eleven (91.7%) eyes were within ±0.5 D of the targeted correction after PRK enhancement. The overall satisfaction score was significantly improved, from 3.7 ± 2.4 (range 0-7) preoperatively to 6.0 ± 2.4 (range 2-9) postoperatively (p = 0.02). No vision-threatening complications were seen throughout the observation period. CONCLUSIONS: PRK enhancement was effective with predictable refractive results and thus improved patient satisfaction for dissatisfied patients after pseudophakic monovision. These findings also suggest that the accurate correction of refractive errors plays a key role in successful pseudophakic monovision.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the etiology and the clinical outcomes of secondary surgical interventions for dissatisfied patients after pseudophakic monovision. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Kitasato University Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: This study comprised 12 eyes in 12 patients (age 66.2 ± 5.6 years) who underwent photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) enhancement to improve their dissatisfaction after pseudophakic monovision. We quantitatively assessed the visual and refractive outcomes and the subjective satisfaction measured using a visual analog scale, that ranged from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 10 (very satisfied), before and 3 months after PRK enhancement. RESULTS: Six (50%) of the 12 patients were dissatisfied with their various distance visions because of a large amount of anisometropia (≥2.50 D). Two (16.7%) were dissatisfied with their distance vision after conventional monovision because of residual cylindrical errors (≥0.75 D) in the dominant eye. Three (25%) was an unknown origin. The remaining one of the 12 patients was dissatisfied due to the unadaptability to crossed monovision. Eleven (91.7%) eyes were within ±0.5 D of the targeted correction after PRK enhancement. The overall satisfaction score was significantly improved, from 3.7 ± 2.4 (range 0-7) preoperatively to 6.0 ± 2.4 (range 2-9) postoperatively (p = 0.02). No vision-threatening complications were seen throughout the observation period. CONCLUSIONS: PRK enhancement was effective with predictable refractive results and thus improved patient satisfaction for dissatisfied patients after pseudophakic monovision. These findings also suggest that the accurate correction of refractive errors plays a key role in successful pseudophakic monovision.
Authors: Irene C Kuo; Terrence P O'Brien; Aimee T Broman; Mehdi Ghajarnia; Nada S Jabbur Journal: J Cataract Refract Surg Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 3.351
Authors: Marcus Ang; Damien Gatinel; Dan Z Reinstein; Erik Mertens; Jorge L Alió Del Barrio; Jorge L Alió Journal: Eye (Lond) Date: 2020-07-24 Impact factor: 3.775