Literature DB >> 28523282

Comparative study of computational visual attention models on two-dimensional medical images.

Gezheng Wen1,2, Brenda Rodriguez-Niño3, Furkan Y Pecen3, David J Vining2, Naveen Garg2, Mia K Markey3,4.   

Abstract

Computational modeling of visual attention is an active area of research. These models have been successfully employed in applications such as robotics. However, most computational models of visual attention are developed in the context of natural scenes, and their role with medical images is not well investigated. As radiologists interpret a large number of clinical images in a limited time, an efficient strategy to deploy their visual attention is necessary. Visual saliency maps, highlighting image regions that differ dramatically from their surroundings, are expected to be predictive of where radiologists fixate their gaze. We compared 16 state-of-art saliency models over three medical imaging modalities. The estimated saliency maps were evaluated against radiologists' eye movements. The results show that the models achieved competitive accuracy using three metrics, but the rank order of the models varied significantly across the three modalities. Moreover, the model ranks on the medical images were all considerably different from the model ranks on the benchmark MIT300 dataset of natural images. Thus, modality-specific tuning of saliency models is necessary to make them valuable for applications in fields such as medical image compression and radiology education.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bottom-up; eye tracking; saliency; visual attention

Year:  2017        PMID: 28523282      PMCID: PMC5424839          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.4.2.025503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  34 in total

1.  On the relationship between optical variability, visual saliency, and eye fixations: a computational approach.

Authors:  Antón Garcia-Diaz; Víctor Leborán; Xosé R Fdez-Vidal; Xosé M Pardo
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Image compression techniques for medical diagnostic imaging systems.

Authors:  M Rabbani; P W Jones
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Eye-movement study and human performance using telepathology virtual slides: implications for medical education and differences with experience.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Krupinski; Allison A Tillack; Lynne Richter; Jeffrey T Henderson; Achyut K Bhattacharyya; Katherine M Scott; Anna R Graham; Michael R Descour; John R Davis; Ronald S Weinstein
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.466

4.  Visual scanning patterns of radiologists searching mammograms.

Authors:  E A Krupinski
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  Image Signature: Highlighting Sparse Salient Regions.

Authors:  J Harel; C Koch
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 6.226

6.  Scanners and drillers: characterizing expert visual search through volumetric images.

Authors:  Trafton Drew; Melissa Le-Hoa Vo; Alex Olwal; Francine Jacobson; Steven E Seltzer; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 7.  Computational modelling of visual attention.

Authors:  L Itti; C Koch
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 34.870

8.  Components of bottom-up gaze allocation in natural images.

Authors:  Robert J Peters; Asha Iyer; Laurent Itti; Christof Koch
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 9.  Current perspectives in medical image perception.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Krupinski
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  The effect of expertise on eye movement behaviour in medical image perception.

Authors:  Raymond Bertram; Laura Helle; Johanna K Kaakinen; Erkki Svedström
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Mandating Limits on Workload, Duty, and Speed in Radiology.

Authors:  Robert Alexander; Stephen Waite; Michael A Bruno; Elizabeth A Krupinski; Leonard Berlin; Stephen Macknik; Susana Martinez-Conde
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 29.146

Review 2.  What do radiologists look for? Advances and limitations of perceptual learning in radiologic search.

Authors:  Robert G Alexander; Stephen Waite; Stephen L Macknik; Susana Martinez-Conde
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 2.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.