Literature DB >> 28523085

Free Bone Grafts for Mandibular Reconstruction in Patients Who Have Not Received Radiotherapy: The 6-cm Rule-Myth or Reality?

Baljeet Nandra1, Tirbod Fattahi2, Tim Martin1, Prav Praveen1, Rui Fernandes2, Sat Parmar1.   

Abstract

Bony reconstruction of the mandible after surgical resection results in improved rehabilitation and aesthetics. Composite tissue transfer has transformed reconstruction, particularly in patients who have received radiotherapy. However, there is morbidity related to free tissue transfer. Free nonvascularized bone grafts have much lower morbidity. Surgeons believe that free bone grafts greater than 6.0 cm are prone to failure. The aims of this study was to assess whether bone grafts greater than 6.0 cm in length have a high risk of failure. A retrospective study was performed on all patients who had free bone grafts greater than 6.0 cm in length at Birmingham, UK, and Florida, the United States. None of the patients received radiotherapy. A total of 14 patients had undergone bone grafts for mandibular defects greater than 6.0 cm in length; 13 of the bone grafts were successful. Of these 13, none were infected and there was radiographic evidence of bony union. Some of the patients have been dentally rehabilitated with implants. Contrary to much of the literature and many surgeons belief, our study has shown that long mandibular defects (>6.0 cm) are not a contraindication to the use of free bone grafts. Key principles to achieve success are discussed in this article.

Entities:  

Keywords:  free bone grafts; free flaps; implants; reconstruction; staged reconstruction

Year:  2017        PMID: 28523085      PMCID: PMC5435492          DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1597583

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr        ISSN: 1943-3875


  5 in total

Review 1.  Mandibular reconstruction in adults: a review.

Authors:  Bee Tin Goh; Shermin Lee; Henk Tideman; Paul J W Stoelinga
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 2.789

2.  Vascularized bone flaps versus nonvascularized bone grafts for mandibular reconstruction: an outcome analysis of primary bony union and endosseous implant success.

Authors:  R D Foster; J P Anthony; A Sharma; M A Pogrel
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.147

3.  A comparison of vascularized and nonvascularized bone grafts for reconstruction of mandibular continuity defects.

Authors:  M A Pogrel; S Podlesh; J P Anthony; J Alexander
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 1.895

4.  Comparison of the late results of mandibular reconstruction using nonvascularized or vascularized grafts and dental implants.

Authors:  H Schliephake; R Schmelzeisen; H Husstedt; L U Schmidt-Wondera
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 1.895

5.  Nonvascularized bone grafts for segmental reconstruction of the mandible--a reappraisal.

Authors:  Johannes T M van Gemert; Robert J J van Es; Ellen M Van Cann; Ron Koole
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.895

  5 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Hydrogel: A Potential Material for Bone Tissue Engineering Repairing the Segmental Mandibular Defect.

Authors:  D S Abdullah Al Maruf; Yohaann Ali Ghosh; Hai Xin; Kai Cheng; Payal Mukherjee; Jeremy Micah Crook; Gordon George Wallace; Travis Jacob Klein; Jonathan Robert Clark
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 4.967

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.