| Literature DB >> 28523024 |
Niuniu Sun1, Lequn Wei2, Diansen Chen3, Wanqin Gao4, Huanzhang Niu5, Chao He6.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical effect of fallopian tube obstruction recanalization by ozone.Entities:
Keywords: Fallopian tube obstruction; Interventional therapy; Ozone; Tubal infertility
Year: 2017 PMID: 28523024 PMCID: PMC5432691 DOI: 10.12669/pjms.332.11961
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pak J Med Sci ISSN: 1681-715X Impact factor: 1.088
Comparison of the clinical data between the two groups.
| Experimental group | 28.4±3.1 | 17 | 41 | 24 | 34 | 56 | 2 |
| Control group | 28.7±3.6 | 18 | 40 | 22 | 36 | 57 | 1 |
| p | 0.6315 | 0.8397 | 0.7042 | 0.5586 | |||
Fig.1The process of the fallopian tube recanalization in multipara by ozone water perfusion.
A, F, K: cervix, uterine cavity and salpingography showed bilateral fallopian tube obstruction; B, G, L: the guide wire was used to dredge the left fallopian tube.1-2ml contrast agent was injected to determine the unobstructed fallopian tube; C, H, M: the right fallopian tube was dredged using the guide wire. 1-2ml contrast agent was injected to determine the unobstructed fallopian tube. D, I, N: the uterine cavity and bilateral fallopian tubes were perfused using 20ml 40ug/ml ozone water. E, J, O: after the fallopian tube obstruction recanalization then the first menstrual cycle for 3-7 d, the uterus and bilateral fallopian tubes radiography was performed under the digital subtraction X ray machine. The result showed that obstruction of bilateral fallopian tubes were removed.
Comparison of clinical efficacy between the two groups % (n).
| Experimental group | 93.1(54/58) | 79.3(46/58) | 5.2(3/58) |
| Control group | 91.4(53/58) | 60.3(35/58) | 17.2(10/58) |
| P | 0.7285 | 0.0261 | 0.0394 |