Literature DB >> 28522287

Patterns of Regional Lymphadenectomy for Clinically Node-negative Patients With Penile Carcinoma: Analysis From the National Cancer Database From 1998 to 2012.

Juan Chipollini1, Dominic H Tang1, Pranav Sharma2, Adam S Baumgarten3, Philippe E Spiess4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Evidence supports upfront regional lymphadenectomy (rND) when primary penile tumors exhibit high-risk features and negative inguinal adenopathy (cN0). We sought to analyze trends in the utilization of early rND as well as assess factors associated with its use and survival outcomes using a nationwide cancer registry database. PATIENT AND METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with clinically nonmetastatic penile carcinoma and available nodal status who underwent rND from 1998 to 2012. Temporal trends in the utilization of early rND for those with cN0 disease were analyzed, and a multivariable logistic regression model was used to identify predictors for receiving rND. Survival analysis based on rND status was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard regression.
RESULTS: From 1919 patients with available clinicopathologic variables, performance of early rND was documented in 377 (19.6%) patients with an increase in utilization over time (P = .001). The increase was driven by academic and comprehensive cancer programs compared with community programs (P < .001). Positive predictors were treatment facility, clinical tumor stage, and grade (all P < .05). African American patients (odds ratio [OR], 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.33-0.86; P = .01) and those aged > 75 years (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.26-0.68; P < .001) were significantly less likely to receive rND. Early rND was associated with improved overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.67; 95% CI, 0.52-0.87; P = .003).
CONCLUSION: There was increased use of early lymphadenectomy for patients with cN0 penile cancer driven by comprehensive and academic cancer programs. The study demonstrated demographic and socioeconomic differences that can help identify barriers to care for patients with penile cancer in the United States.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  African American; Early lymphadenectomy; Penile cancer; Referral patterns; Socioeconomic disparities

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28522287     DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2017.04.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer        ISSN: 1558-7673            Impact factor:   2.872


  4 in total

Review 1.  Immune-based therapies in penile cancer.

Authors:  Vidhu B Joshi; Philippe E Spiess; Andrea Necchi; Curtis A Pettaway; Jad Chahoud
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 16.430

2.  Effect of inguinal lymph node dissection in lymph node negative patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis.

Authors:  Stefano Tappero; Mattia Piccinelli; Francesco Barletta; Andrea Panunzio; Cristina Cano Garcia; Reha-Baris Incesu; Zhe Tian; Stefano Parodi; Paolo Dell'Oglio; Ottavio De Cobelli; Alberto Briganti; Alessandro Antonelli; Felix K H Chun; Markus Graefen; Fred Saad; Shahrokh F Shariat; Nazareno R Suardi; Marco Borghesi; Carlo Terrone; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 3.661

Review 3.  Non-Coding RNA in Penile Cancer.

Authors:  Jaqueline Diniz Pinho; Gyl Eanes Barros Silva; Antonio Augusto Lima Teixeira-Júnior; Thalita Moura Silva Rocha; Lecildo Lira Batista; Amanda Marques de Sousa; José de Ribamar Rodrigues Calixto; Rommel Rodrigues Burbano; Carolina Rosal Teixeira de Souza; André Salim Khayat
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 4.  Technical management of inguinal lymph-nodes in penile cancer: open versus minimal invasive.

Authors:  Andres Felipe Correa
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-05
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.