Literature DB >> 28522107

Differences in neurohumoral and hemodynamic response to prolonged head-up tilt between patients with high and normal standing norepinephrine forms of postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome.

Luka Crnošija1, Magdalena Krbot Skorić2, Mila Lovrić3, Anamari Junaković2, Vladimir Miletić2, Rujana Šprljan Alfirev2, Antun Pavelić1, Ivan Adamec2, Mario Habek4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the optimal timing for blood sample collection of catecholamines and the possible correlations between neurohumoral and hemodynamic responses to prolonged head-up tilt (HUT) in postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS).
METHODS: Nineteen patients underwent a 30-minute, 70° HUT test. Blood samples (norepinephrine (NE), epinephrine and dopamine) were taken in the 10th minute of supine, and 10th, 20th and 30th minutes of HUT.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the proportion of high and normal standing NE patients in the different time points. Mean NE (nmol/L) values in 10th, 20th and 30th minute of HUT were 4.37, 4.87, and 4.35 in the high standing NE, and 2.49, 2.59 and 2.88 in the normal standing NE group. High standing NE patients had higher blood pressure (BP) during the first 6min of HUT (2nd minute after the HUT systolic BP (sBP): 118.29±15.65 vs. 95.70±13.43, p=0.004; diastolic BP (dBP): 78.71±6.68 vs. 65.10±9.04, p=0.003), while normal standing NE patients exhibited a drop in BP compared to resting values during the same time period. The normal standing NE group exhibited a progressive increase in norepinephrine values during the HUT.
CONCLUSION: One blood sample taken at the 10th minute of HUT correctly identifies high and normal standing NE POTS patients, but a small number of patients (1 out of 19, 5.2%) can be misidentified. High and normal standing NE POTS patients display distinctly different neurohumoral and hemodynamic responses to HUT.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dopamine; Epinephrine; High standing NE; Norepinephrine; Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28522107     DOI: 10.1016/j.autneu.2017.05.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Auton Neurosci        ISSN: 1566-0702            Impact factor:   3.145


  4 in total

Review 1.  Orthostatic Intolerance and Coagulation Abnormalities: An Update.

Authors:  Wei Quan; Yuchen Wang; Selena Chen; Junbao Du
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 5.203

2.  Let's not forget about the vagus and other updates on recent autonomic research.

Authors:  Srikanth Muppidi; Mitchell G Miglis
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 4.435

Review 3.  Postural tachycardia syndrome: current perspectives.

Authors:  Rachel Wells; Andrew J Spurrier; Dominik Linz; Celine Gallagher; Rajiv Mahajan; Prashanthan Sanders; Amanda Page; Dennis H Lau
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2017-12-29

4.  Efficacy of β-Blockers on Postural Tachycardia Syndrome in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xinwei Deng; Yuyang Zhang; Ying Liao; Junbao Du
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 3.418

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.