Katherine A Kaplan1, Prajesh P Hardas1, Susan Redline2, Jamie M Zeitzer3. 1. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford Center for Sleep Sciences and Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. 2. Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA. 3. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford Center for Sleep Sciences and Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Mental Illness Research Education and Clinical Center, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA. Electronic address: jzeitzer@stanford.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: In older adults, traditional metrics derived from polysomnography (PSG) are not well correlated with subjective sleep quality. Little is known about whether the association between PSG and subjective sleep quality changes with age, or whether quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG) is associated with sleep quality. Therefore, we examined the relationship between subjective sleep quality and objective sleep characteristics (standard PSG and qEEG) across middle to older adulthood. METHODS: Using cross-sectional analyses of 3173 community-dwelling men and women aged between 39 and 90 participating in the Sleep Heart Health Study, we examined the relationship between a morning rating of the prior night's sleep quality (sleep depth and restfulness) and polysomnographic, and qEEG descriptors of that single night of sleep, along with clinical and demographic measures. Multivariable models were constructed using two machine learning methods, namely lasso penalized regressions and random forests. RESULTS: Little variance was explained across models. Greater objective sleep efficiency, reduced wake after sleep onset, and fewer sleep-to-wake stage transitions were each associated with higher sleep quality; qEEG variables contributed little explanatory power. The oldest adults reported the highest sleep quality even as objective sleep deteriorated such that they would rate their sleep better, given the same level of sleep efficiency. Despite this, there were no major differences in the predictors of subjective sleep across the age span. CONCLUSION: Standard metrics derived from PSG, including qEEG, contribute little to explaining subjective sleep quality in middle-aged to older adults. The objective correlates of subjective sleep quality do not appear to systematically change with age despite a change in the relationship between subjective sleep quality and objective sleep efficiency. Published by Elsevier B.V.
OBJECTIVES: In older adults, traditional metrics derived from polysomnography (PSG) are not well correlated with subjective sleep quality. Little is known about whether the association between PSG and subjective sleep quality changes with age, or whether quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG) is associated with sleep quality. Therefore, we examined the relationship between subjective sleep quality and objective sleep characteristics (standard PSG and qEEG) across middle to older adulthood. METHODS: Using cross-sectional analyses of 3173 community-dwelling men and women aged between 39 and 90 participating in the Sleep Heart Health Study, we examined the relationship between a morning rating of the prior night's sleep quality (sleep depth and restfulness) and polysomnographic, and qEEG descriptors of that single night of sleep, along with clinical and demographic measures. Multivariable models were constructed using two machine learning methods, namely lasso penalized regressions and random forests. RESULTS: Little variance was explained across models. Greater objective sleep efficiency, reduced wake after sleep onset, and fewer sleep-to-wake stage transitions were each associated with higher sleep quality; qEEG variables contributed little explanatory power. The oldest adults reported the highest sleep quality even as objective sleep deteriorated such that they would rate their sleep better, given the same level of sleep efficiency. Despite this, there were no major differences in the predictors of subjective sleep across the age span. CONCLUSION: Standard metrics derived from PSG, including qEEG, contribute little to explaining subjective sleep quality in middle-aged to older adults. The objective correlates of subjective sleep quality do not appear to systematically change with age despite a change in the relationship between subjective sleep quality and objective sleep efficiency. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Entities:
Keywords:
Aging; Machine learning; Polysomnography; Sex differences; Sleep quality
Authors: T Hori; Y Sugita; E Koga; S Shirakawa; K Inoue; S Uchida; H Kuwahara; M Kousaka; T Kobayashi; Y Tsuji; M Terashima; K Fukuda; N Fukuda Journal: Psychiatry Clin Neurosci Date: 2001-06 Impact factor: 5.188
Authors: D Aeschbach; B J Lockyer; D-J Dijk; S W Lockley; E S Nuwayser; L D Nichols; C A Czeisler Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2009-07-15 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Oreste Marrone; Fabio Cibella; Gabriel Roisman; Pawel Sliwinski; Pavol Joppa; Ozen K Basoglu; Izolde Bouloukaki; Sophia Schiza; Athanasia Pataka; Richard Staats; Johan Verbraecken; Jan Hedner; Ludger Grote; Maria R Bonsignore Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2020-09-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Christopher E Kline; Martica H Hall; Daniel J Buysse; Conrad P Earnest; Timothy S Church Journal: Metab Syndr Relat Disord Date: 2018-03-20 Impact factor: 1.894
Authors: Ciro Della Monica; Sigurd Johnsen; Giuseppe Atzori; John A Groeger; Derk-Jan Dijk Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2018-06-22 Impact factor: 4.157
Authors: Joseph R Winer; Allison Morehouse; Laura Fenton; Theresa M Harrison; Lylian Ayangma; Mark Reed; Samika Kumar; Suzanne L Baker; William J Jagust; Matthew P Walker Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2021-07-21 Impact factor: 6.167