Literature DB >> 28521951

Validation of the AnyBody full body musculoskeletal model in computing lumbar spine loads at L4L5 level.

Tito Bassani1, Elena Stucovitz2, Zhihui Qian3, Matteo Briguglio2, Fabio Galbusera2.   

Abstract

In the panorama of available musculoskeletal modeling software, AnyBody software is a commercial tool that provides a full body musculoskeletal model which is increasingly exploited by numerous researchers worldwide. In this regard, model validation becomes essential to guarantee the suitability of the model in representing the simulated system. When focusing on lumbar spine, the previous works aimed at validating the AnyBody model in computing the intervertebral loads held several limitations, and a comprehensive validation is to be considered as lacking. The present study was aimed at extensively validating the suitability of the AnyBody model in computing lumbar spine loads at L4L5 level. The intersegmental loads were calculated during twelve specific exercise tasks designed to accurately replicate the conditions during which Wilke et al. (2001) measured in vivo the L4L5 intradiscal pressure. Motion capture data of one volunteer subject were acquired during the execution of the tasks and then imported into AnyBody to set model kinematics. Two different approaches in computing intradiscal pressure from the intersegmental load were evaluated. Lumbopelvic rhythm was compared with reference in vivo measurements to assess the accuracy of the lumbopelvic kinematics. Positive agreement was confirmed between the calculated pressures and the in vivo measurements, thus demonstrating the suitability of the AnyBody model. Specific caution needs to be taken only when considering postures characterized by large lateral displacements. Minor discrepancy was found assessing lumbopelvic rhythm. The present findings promote the AnyBody model as an appropriate tool to non-invasively evaluate the lumbar loads at L4L5 in physiological activities.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  AnyBody; Motion capture; Musculoskeletal modeling; Spine biomechanics

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28521951     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.04.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  8 in total

1.  Intrasubject repeatability of in vivo intervertebral motion parameters using quantitative fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Alexander Breen; Rebecca Hemming; Fiona Mellor; Alan Breen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-12-08       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Lumbar spine loads are reduced for activities of daily living when using a braced arm-to-thigh technique.

Authors:  Erica Beaucage-Gauvreau; Scott C E Brandon; William S P Robertson; Robert Fraser; Brian J C Freeman; Ryan B Graham; Dominic Thewlis; Claire F Jones
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Musculoskeletal full-body models including a detailed thoracolumbar spine for children and adolescents aged 6-18 years.

Authors:  Stefan Schmid; Katelyn A Burkhart; Brett T Allaire; Daniel Grindle; Dennis E Anderson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Latent Ergonomics Maps: Real-Time Visualization of Estimated Ergonomics of Human Movements.

Authors:  Lorenzo Vianello; Waldez Gomes; Freek Stulp; Alexis Aubry; Pauline Maurice; Serena Ivaldi
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 3.847

5.  Effect of Repositioning Aids and Patient Weight on Biomechanical Stresses When Repositioning Patients in Bed.

Authors:  Neal Wiggermann; Jie Zhou; Nancy McGann
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 2.888

6.  Dependence of lumbar loads on spinopelvic sagittal alignment: An evaluation based on musculoskeletal modeling.

Authors:  Tito Bassani; Gloria Casaroli; Fabio Galbusera
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Biomechanical Analysis of Stoop and Free-Style Squat Lifting and Lowering with a Generic Back-Support Exoskeleton Model.

Authors:  Mark Tröster; Sarah Budde; Christophe Maufroy; Michael Skipper Andersen; John Rasmussen; Urs Schneider; Thomas Bauernhansl
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 4.614

8.  Effect of Unilateral Knee Extension Restriction on the Lumbar Region during Gait.

Authors:  Shintaro Nakatsuji; Masayuki Kawada; Yasufumi Takeshita; Yuta Matsuzawa; Kazutaka Hata; Sota Araki; Ryoji Kiyama
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 3.822

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.