Literature DB >> 28521464

Integration of Child-Pugh score with future liver remnant yields improved prediction of liver dysfunction risk for HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma following hepatic resection.

Heng Zou1, Yiming Tao1, Zhi-Ming Wang1.   

Abstract

Assessment of hepatic functional reserve is important to enable the selection of appropriate treatment methods and safe hepatic resection in hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In the present study, an evaluation was made of the clinical value of combining the Child-Pugh score (CPS) with the standardized future liver remnant (sFLR) measurement to predict postoperative liver dysfunction (PLD). A total of 61 HBV-related HCC patients undergoing liver volumetry prior to hepatectomy were enrolled in the study. The sFLR was calculated as the ratio of FLR volume to standardized liver volume. PLD was defined as a prothrombin time of >18 sec or a peak serum bilirubin level of >51.3 µmol/l for 7 days after surgery. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed to identify risk factors associated with PLD. The correlation between PLD and the combination of sFLR and CPS was analyzed. In total, 18 out of 61 patients developed PLD (29.5%), with a significantly higher PLD incidence for a CPS of 6 than a CPS of 5 (P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that a prothrombin time of <13.3 sec and an sFLR of <0.55 were independent risk factors for PLD. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis revealed that the cut-off values of sFLR and sFLR/CPS for predicting PLD were 54.5% and 0.0916, respectively, with areas under the ROC curve of 0.820 and 0.860, respectively. The combination of CPS and sFLR appears to yield improved prediction of the occurrence of PLD compared with either CPS or sFLR alone.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Child-Pugh score; future liver remnant; hepatectomy; hepatocellular carcinoma; postoperative liver dysfunction

Year:  2017        PMID: 28521464      PMCID: PMC5431318          DOI: 10.3892/ol.2017.5919

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Lett        ISSN: 1792-1074            Impact factor:   2.967


  25 in total

Review 1.  Strategies for safer liver surgery and partial liver transplantation.

Authors:  Pierre-Alain Clavien; Henrik Petrowsky; Michelle L DeOliveira; Rolf Graf
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-04-12       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  New perspectives in the assessment of future remnant liver.

Authors:  Kasia P Cieslak; Jurgen H Runge; Michal Heger; Jaap Stoker; Roelof J Bennink; Thomas M van Gulik
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 2.588

3.  Liver planning software accurately predicts postoperative liver volume and measures early regeneration.

Authors:  Amber L Simpson; David A Geller; Alan W Hemming; William R Jarnagin; Logan W Clements; Michael I D'Angelica; Prashanth Dumpuri; Mithat Gönen; Ivan Zendejas; Michael I Miga; James D Stefansic
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Right hepatectomy for living donation: role of remnant liver volume in predicting hepatic dysfunction and complications.

Authors:  Marcelo Facciuto; Alan Contreras-Saldivar; Manoj K Singh; Juan P Rocca; Bachir Taouli; Irina Oyfe; Dianne LaPointe Rudow; Gabriel E Gondolesi; Thomas D Schiano; Leona Kim-Schluger; Myron E Schwartz; Charles M Miller; Sander Florman
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Virtual hepatic resection using three-dimensional reconstruction of helical computed tomography angioportograms.

Authors:  S J Wigmore; D N Redhead; X J Yan; J Casey; K Madhavan; C H Dejong; E J Currie; O J Garden
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Assessment of liver function in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a new evidence-based approach-the ALBI grade.

Authors:  Philip J Johnson; Sarah Berhane; Chiaki Kagebayashi; Shinji Satomura; Mabel Teng; Helen L Reeves; James O'Beirne; Richard Fox; Anna Skowronska; Daniel Palmer; Winnie Yeo; Frankie Mo; Paul Lai; Mercedes Iñarrairaegui; Stephen L Chan; Bruno Sangro; Rebecca Miksad; Toshifumi Tada; Takashi Kumada; Hidenori Toyoda
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  Hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Alejandro Forner; Josep M Llovet; Jordi Bruix
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Measured versus estimated total liver volume to preoperatively assess the adequacy of the future liver remnant: which method should we use?

Authors:  Dario Ribero; Marco Amisano; Francesca Bertuzzo; Serena Langella; Roberto Lo Tesoriere; Alessandro Ferrero; Daniele Regge; Lorenzo Capussotti
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Remnant liver volume-based predictors of postoperative liver dysfunction after hepatectomy: analysis of 625 consecutive patients from a single institution.

Authors:  Hirohisa Okabe; Toru Beppu; Akira Chikamoto; Hiromitsu Hayashi; Morikatsu Yoshida; Toshiro Masuda; Katsunori Imai; Kosuke Mima; Shigeki Nakagawa; Hideyuki Kuroki; Hidetoshi Nitta; Takatoshi Ishiko; Daisuke Hashimoto; Yasuyuki Yamashita; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 10.  Physiological and biochemical basis of clinical liver function tests: a review.

Authors:  Lisette T Hoekstra; Wilmar de Graaf; Geert A A Nibourg; Michal Heger; Roelof J Bennink; Bruno Stieger; Thomas M van Gulik
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  9 in total

1.  Comprehensive Analyses of the Infiltrating Immune Cell Landscape and Its Clinical Significance in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Zeyu Zhang; Zhiming Wang; Yun Huang
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2021-08-20

2.  Splenic Volume, an Easy-To-Use Predictor of HCC Late Recurrence for HCC Patients After Hepatectomy.

Authors:  Tongdi Fang; Guo Long; Xingyu Mi; Wenxin Su; Lei Mo; Ledu Zhou
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 5.738

3.  Snip-electrocoagulation technique versus clamp-crashing technique for parenchyma transection in liver resection: a pilot study.

Authors:  Liang Xiao; Zhiming Wang; Ledu Zhou
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-06

4.  Selective occlusion of the hepatic artery and portal vein improves liver hypertrophy for staged hepatectomy.

Authors:  Changku Jia; Ke Ge; Sunbing Xu; Ling Liu; Jie Weng; Youke Chen
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 2.754

5.  Preoperative ICG Test to Predict Posthepatectomy Liver Failure and Postoperative Outcomes in Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Min Li; Jie Wang; Jieqiong Song; Feng Shen; Lujun Song; Xiaoling Ni; Tao Suo; Han Liu; Ming Zhong; Houbao Liu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Perineural invasion as a prognostic factor for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after curative resection and a potential indication for postoperative chemotherapy: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Zeyu Zhang; Yufan Zhou; Kuan Hu; Dong Wang; Zhiming Wang; Yun Huang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  End-stage liver disease score and future liver remnant volume predict post-hepatectomy liver failure in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Fan-Hua Kong; Xiong-Ying Miao; Heng Zou; Li Xiong; Yu Wen; Bo Chen; Xi Liu; Jiang-Jiao Zhou
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 1.337

8.  Treatment of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Stage C hepatocellular carcinoma: liver resection versus TACE and beyond.

Authors:  Ya Ruth Huo; Hao Xiang; Michael Vinchill Chan
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-10

9.  Identification of potential prognostic long non-coding RNA for predicting survival in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Zeyu Zhang; Zhiming Wang; Yun Huang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.817

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.