| Literature DB >> 28521397 |
Youbang Xie1,2, Yali Qi2, Yanmiao Zhang1,2, Jiayi Chen1,2, Tianyi Wu3, Yuhai Gu2.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of hypoxia and PI3K inhibition on angiogenic factors in A549 lung cancer cells. A549 cells were treated with the PI3K inhibitor LY294002 under normoxic and hypoxic conditions. Untreated cells were used as the control group and those treated by the inhibitor, as the suppression group. The cells were further divided based on normoxic or hypoxic conditions and named: Normoxic control group, normoxic suppression group, hypoxic control group and hypoxic suppression group. Expression levels of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1α and AKT1 mRNA in all groups were determined by reverse transcriptase-quantitative polymerase chain reaction and concentrations of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), angiotensin II (ANG-II), transforming growth factor (TGF)-α/β1, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α in the culture supernatant were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The expression levels of HIF-1α and AKT1 mRNA in the hypoxic control group were higher than those in the normoxic control group and the expression levels of HIF-1α and AKT1 mRNA in the hypoxic control group were higher than those in the hypoxic suppression group. Compared to the normoxic control and normoxic suppression groups, the concentrations of VEGF and TNF-α in supernatant were higher in the hypoxic control and hypoxic suppression groups, respectively. However, TGF-α and TGF-β1 demonstrated the opposite trend of the aforementioned factors. The concentration of ANG-II in the hypoxic suppression group was higher than that in the normoxic suppression group. In addition, compared to the normoxic control group and hypoxic control group, the concentrations of VEGF and TGF-β1 in supernatant were lower in the normoxic suppression group and in the hypoxic suppression group, respectively. In conclusion, the results of the present study suggest that hypoxia can stimulate A549 lung cancer cells to secrete VEGF and TNF-α and inhibit TGF-α and TGF-β1. The ability of A549 cells to secrete VEGF and TGF-β1 is regulated by PI3K/Akt, and ANG-II expression may be regulated by the PI3K/Akt pathway under hypoxic condition.Entities:
Keywords: PI3K pathway; angiogenesis factors; hypoxia; lung cancer
Year: 2017 PMID: 28521397 PMCID: PMC5431373 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2017.5811
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncol Lett ISSN: 1792-1074 Impact factor: 2.967
Figure 1.A549 cells stained with Wright-Giemsa. Cells demonstrate epithelial cell-like adherent growth. Magnification, (A) ×40, (B) ×100.
Figure 2.The hypoxia and PI3K inhibitor LY294002 effects in the migration of A549 cells (magnification, ×10). (A1-A3) Normoxic control group, (B1-B3) normoxic suppression group, (C1-C3) hypoxic control group, and (D1-D3) hypoxic suppression group at 0, 6 and 20 h, respectively. Whether under normoxic or hypoxic condition, the scratch wound was completely filled by cells after 20 h when untreated. Scratch wounds were incomplete after 20 h when treated with LY294002.
Effect of hypoxia and PI3K inhibitor LY294002 on HIF-1α and AKT1 mRNA expression (mean ± SD, n=9).
| Normoxic | Hypoxic | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | HIF-1α | AKT1 | HIF-1α | AKT1 |
| Control | 0.54±0.15 | 1.19±0.26 | 1.57±0.43[ | 2.18±0.50[ |
| Suppression | 0.97±0.94 | 2.18±1.57 | 0.85±0.28 | 1.27±0.27 |
| t-test | −1.050 | −1.469 | 0.3716 | 5.183 |
| P-value | 0.353 | 0.216 | 0.021 | 0.007 |
Compared to normoxic control group P<0.05. SD, standard deviation; HIF-1α, hypoxia-inducible factor-1α.
Figure 3.The effect of hypoxia and LY294002 on the expression of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1α and AKT1 mRNA. (A) The expression levels of HIF-1α and AKT1 mRNA in the normoxic control group and normoxic suppression group had no significant differences (P>0.05). (B) The expression levels of HIF-1α and AKT1 mRNA in the hypoxic suppression group were significantly lower than in the hypoxic control group (P<0.05). (C) The expression levels of HIF-1α and AKT1 mRNA in the hypoxic control group were significantly higher than in the normoxic control group (P<0.05). (D) The expression levels of HIF-1α and AKT1 mRNA in the normoxic suppression group and hypoxic suppression group were not significantly different (P>0.05).
Effect of hypoxia and PI3K inhibitor LY294002 on the concentrations of angiogenic factors (mean ± SD, n=9).
| Group | Items | Control | Suppression | t-test | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normoxic | VEGF (pg/ml) | 468.26±9.93 | 360.59±24.50 | 13.670 | 0.000 |
| TNF-α (pg/ml) | 10.34±2.89 | 9.22±1.94 | 1.148 | 0.281 | |
| TGF-α (ng/ml) | 520.93±90.74 | 541.49±60.64 | −1.208 | 0.258 | |
| ANG-II (ng/ml) | 12.66±4.39 | 14.67±7.29 | −1.666 | 0.130 | |
| TGF-β1 (pg/ml) | 242.07±40.31 | 54.49±19.28 | 14.425 | 0.000 | |
| Hypoxic | VEGF (pg/ml) | 502.90±23.90[ | 457.83±44.82[ | 3.565 | 0.007 |
| TNF-α (pg/ml) | 16.88±3.84[ | 17.40±3.49[ | −0.321 | 0.756 | |
| TGF-α (ng/ml) | 471.21±62.82[ | 504.04±52.58[ | −2.091 | 0.066 | |
| ANG-II (ng/ml) | 14.66±5.25 | 16.47±6.67[ | −1.715 | 0.121 | |
| TGF-β1 (pg/ml) | 32.32±2.58[ |
Compared to normoxic group P<0.05 (TGF-β1 was lower than the minimal detection concentration indicated by the kit). SD, standard deviation, VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α; TGF, transforming growth factor; ANG-II, angiotensin II.
Figure 4.Effect of hypoxia and LY294002 on the concentration of angiogenic factors. (A) The concentrations of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1 in the normoxic suppression group were significantly lower than in the normoxic control group (P<0.05). (B) The concentrations of VEGF and TGF-β1 in the hypoxic suppression group were significantly lower than in the hypoxic control group (P<0.05). (C) The concentrations of VEGF and TNF-α in the normoxic control group were significantly lower than in the hypoxic control group (P<0.05), whereas TGF-α and TGF-β1 showed opposite trends of expression. (D) The concentrations of VEGF, TNF-α and angiotensin II (ANG-II) in the normoxic suppression group were lower than in the hypoxic suppression group, but TGF-α and TGF-β1 showed the opposite trend of the afore-mentioned factors (P<0.05).