| Literature DB >> 28521193 |
Zhaomin Dong1, Md Mezbaul Bahar1, Joytishna Jit2, Bruce Kennedy3, Brian Priestly4, Jack Ng5, Dane Lamb1, Yanju Liu1, Luchun Duan1, Ravi Naidu6.
Abstract
On 25th May 2016, the U.S. EPA released reference doses (RfDs) for Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS) and Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) of 20ng/kg/day, which were much more conservative than previous values. These RfDs rely on the choices of animal point of departure (PoD) and the toxicokinetics (TK) model. At this stage, considering that the human evidence is not strong enough for RfD determination, using animal data may be appropriate but with more uncertainties. In this article, the uncertainties concerning RfDs from the choices of PoD and TK models are addressed. Firstly, the candidate PoDs should include more critical endpoints (such as immunotoxicity), which may lead to lower RfDs. Secondly, the reliability of the adopted three-compartment TK model is compromised: the parameters are not non-biologically plausible; and this TK model was applied to simulate gestation and lactation exposures, while the two exposure scenarios were not actually included in the model structure.Entities:
Keywords: PFOA; PFOS; Reference dose; Toxicity; Uncertainties
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28521193 DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2017.05.006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Int ISSN: 0160-4120 Impact factor: 9.621