Literature DB >> 28521109

Cost-Effectiveness of Caries Prevention in Practice: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

C O'Neill1, H V Worthington2, M Donaldson3, S Birch4,5, S Noble6, S Killough7, L Murphy8, M Greer9, J Brodison8, R Verghis8, M Tickle2.   

Abstract

A 2-arm parallel-group randomized controlled trial measured the cost-effectiveness of caries prevention in caries-free children aged 2 to 3 y attending general practice. The setting was 22 dental practices in Northern Ireland. Participants were centrally randomized into intervention (22,600 ppm fluoride varnish, toothbrush, a 50-mL tube of 1,450 ppm fluoride toothpaste, and standardized prevention advice) and control (advice only), both provided at 6-monthly intervals during a 3-y follow-up. The primary outcome measure was conversion from caries-free to caries-active states assessed by calibrated and blinded examiners; secondary outcome measures included decayed, missing, or filled teeth surfaces (dmfs); pain; and extraction. Cumulative costs were related to each of the trial's outcomes in a series of incremental cost effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Sensitivity analyses examined the impact of using dentist's time as measured by observation rather than that reported by the dentist. The costs of applying topical fluoride were also estimated assuming the work was undertaken by dental nurses or hygienists rather than dentists. A total of 1,248 children (624 randomized to each group) were recruited, and 1,096 (549 in the intervention group and 547 in the control group) were included in the final analyses. The mean difference in direct health care costs between groups was £107.53 (£155.74 intervention, £48.21 control, P < 0.05) per child. When all health care costs were compared, the intervention group's mean cost was £212.56 more than the control group (£987.53 intervention, £774.97 control, P < 0.05). Statistically significant differences in outcomes were only detected with respect to carious surfaces. The mean cost per carious surface avoided was estimated at £251 (95% confidence interval, £454.39-£79.52). Sensitivity analyses did not materially affect the study's findings. This trial raises concerns about the cost-effectiveness of a fluoride-based intervention delivered at the practice level in the context of a state-funded dental service (EudraCT No: 2009-010725-39; ISRCTN: ISRCTN36180119).

Entities:  

Keywords:  child dentistry; clinical practice; clinical studies/trials; comparative effectiveness research (CER); economic evaluation; fluoride(s)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28521109     DOI: 10.1177/0022034517708968

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Res        ISSN: 0022-0345            Impact factor:   6.116


  3 in total

1.  Effectiveness of Silver Diamine Fluoride for Preventing Occlusal Caries in the Primary Teeth of Preschool Children: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Duangporn Duangthip; Shuyang He; Sherry Shiqian Gao; Chun Hung Chu; Edward Chin Man Lo
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2022-05-23

2.  Clinical Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Oral-Health Promotion in Dental Caries Prevention among Children: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Nadine Fraihat; Saba Madae'en; Zsuzsa Bencze; Adrienn Herczeg; Orsolya Varga
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Cost-effectiveness of child caries management: a randomised controlled trial (FiCTION trial).

Authors:  Tara Homer; Anne Maguire; Gail V A Douglas; Nicola P Innes; Jan E Clarkson; Nina Wilson; Vicky Ryan; Elaine McColl; Mark Robertson; Luke Vale
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 2.757

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.