Literature DB >> 28520845

Follow-up of a Large Prospective Cohort in the United States Using Linkage With Multiple State Cancer Registries.

Eric J Jacobs, Peter J Briggs, Anusila Deka, Christina C Newton, Kevin C Ward, Betsy A Kohler, Susan M Gapstur, Alpa V Patel.   

Abstract

All states in the United States now have a well-established cancer registry. Linkage with these registries may be a cost-effective method of follow-up for cancer incidence in multistate cohort studies. However, the sensitivity of linkage with the current network of state registries for detecting incident cancer diagnoses within cohort studies is not well-documented. We examined the sensitivity of registry linkage among 39,368 men and women from 23 states who enrolled in the Cancer Prevention Study-3 cohort during 2006-2009 and had the opportunity to self-report cancer diagnoses on a questionnaire in 2011. All participants provided name and birthdate, and 94% provided a complete social security number. Of 378 cancer diagnoses between enrollment and 2010 identified through self-report and verified with medical records, 338 were also detected by linkage with the 23 state cancer registries (sensitivity of 89%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 86, 92). Sensitivity was lower for hematologic cancers (69%, 95% CI: 41, 89) and melanoma (70%, 95% CI: 57, 81). After excluding hematologic cancers and melanoma, sensitivity was 94% (95% CI: 91, 97). Our results indicate that linkage with multiple cancer registries can be a sensitive method for ascertaining incident cancers, other than hematologic cancers and melanoma, in multistate cohort studies.
© The Author(s) 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer registries; cohort studies; linkage

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28520845      PMCID: PMC5860149          DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwx129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  21 in total

1.  Outcomes ascertainment and adjudication methods in the Women's Health Initiative.

Authors:  J David Curb; Anne McTiernan; Susan R Heckbert; Charles Kooperberg; Janet Stanford; Michael Nevitt; Karen C Johnson; Lori Proulx-Burns; Lisa Pastore; Michael Criqui; Sandra Daugherty
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.797

2.  High breast cancer incidence rates among California teachers: results from the California Teachers Study (United States).

Authors:  Leslie Bernstein; Mark Allen; Hoda Anton-Culver; Dennis Deapen; Pamela L Horn-Ross; David Peel; Richard Pinder; Peggy Reynolds; Jane Sullivan-Halley; Dee West; William Wright; Al Ziogas; Ronald K Ross
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.506

3.  Melanoma reporting to central cancer registries by US dermatologists: an analysis of the persistent knowledge and practice gap.

Authors:  Todd V Cartee; Seema P Kini; Suephy C Chen
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 11.527

4.  Southern community cohort study: establishing a cohort to investigate health disparities.

Authors:  Lisa B Signorello; Margaret K Hargreaves; Mark D Steinwandel; Wei Zheng; Qiuyin Cai; David G Schlundt; Maciej S Buchowski; Carolyne W Arnold; Joseph K McLaughlin; William J Blot
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.798

5.  The American Cancer Society Cancer Prevention Study II Nutrition Cohort: rationale, study design, and baseline characteristics.

Authors:  Eugenia E Calle; Carmen Rodriguez; Eric J Jacobs; M Lyn Almon; Ann Chao; Marjorie L McCullough; Heather S Feigelson; Michael J Thun
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Lung cancer risk among smokers of menthol cigarettes.

Authors:  William J Blot; Sarah S Cohen; Melinda Aldrich; Joseph K McLaughlin; Margaret K Hargreaves; Lisa B Signorello
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Establishment of the cancer prevention study II nutrition cohort colorectal tissue repository.

Authors:  Peter T Campbell; Anusila Deka; Peter Briggs; Mine Cicek; Alton B Farris; Mia M Gaudet; Eric J Jacobs; Christina C Newton; Alpa V Patel; Lauren R Teras; Stephen N Thibodeau; Lori Tillmans; Susan M Gapstur
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Validity of self-reported cancers in a prospective cohort study in comparison with data from state cancer registries.

Authors:  M M Bergmann; E E Calle; C A Mervis; H L Miracle-McMahill; M J Thun; C W Heath
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1998-03-15       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Utility of the National Death Index for ascertainment of mortality among cancer prevention study II participants.

Authors:  E E Calle; D D Terrell
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1993-01-15       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  A prospective cohort study of vasectomy and prostate cancer in US men.

Authors:  E Giovannucci; A Ascherio; E B Rimm; G A Colditz; M J Stampfer; W C Willett
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-02-17       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  1 in total

1.  Key risk factors for the relative and absolute 5-year risk of cancer to enhance cancer screening and prevention.

Authors:  Alpa V Patel; Emily Deubler; Lauren R Teras; Graham A Colditz; Cari J Lichtman; William G Cance; Christina A Clarke
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 6.921

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.