Literature DB >> 28520844

Fracture Risk Assessment With FRAX Using Real-World Data in a Population-Based Cohort From Israel.

Inbal Goldshtein1,2, Yariv Gerber3, Sophia Ish-Shalom4, Moshe Leshno1.   

Abstract

The predictive value of the World Health Organization's Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) was evaluated using real-world community data. A population-based cohort of 141,320 women aged 50-90 years (median age, 58 years; interquartile range, 54-67) in 2004 was extracted from the central database of a large Israeli health-care services provider and insurer. Retrospective FRAX scores were calculated using computerized health records and compared with actual incidence of major osteoporotic fractures (MOFs) during the following 10 years. Fracture proportions of 6.9% for MOFs and 2.2% for hip fractures were expected, as opposed to 13.5% and 2.9% observed. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of FRAX scores calculated without the inclusion of bone mineral density (BMD) data was 0.65 (95% confidence interval: 0.65, 0.66) for MOF and 0.82 (95% confidence interval: 0.81, 0.82) for hip fracture. A total of 16,578 subjects had BMD data at the index date, and their risk estimates based solely on BMD exhibited lower predictive performance for both MOFs (AUC = 0.62 vs. 0.65; P = 0.003) and hip fractures (AUC = 0.78 vs. 0.84; P < 0.001) as compared with FRAX. FRAX scores based on electronic health records provided reasonable discrimination despite some underestimation of the absolute risk of nonhip fractures. Integration of FRAX with routine clinical systems could increase implementation in daily practice and improve risk detection, especially for patients without BMD data.
© The Author(s) 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FRAX; aged; fracture risk; fractures; osteoporosis

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28520844     DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwx128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  5 in total

Review 1.  Update of the fracture risk prediction tool FRAX: a systematic review of potential cohorts and analysis plan.

Authors:  L Vandenput; H Johansson; E V McCloskey; E Liu; K E Åkesson; F A Anderson; R Azagra; C L Bager; C Beaudart; H A Bischoff-Ferrari; E Biver; O Bruyère; J A Cauley; J R Center; R Chapurlat; C Christiansen; C Cooper; C J Crandall; S R Cummings; J A P da Silva; B Dawson-Hughes; A Diez-Perez; A B Dufour; J A Eisman; P J M Elders; S Ferrari; Y Fujita; S Fujiwara; C-C Glüer; I Goldshtein; D Goltzman; V Gudnason; J Hall; D Hans; M Hoff; R J Hollick; M Huisman; M Iki; S Ish-Shalom; G Jones; M K Karlsson; S Khosla; D P Kiel; W-P Koh; F Koromani; M A Kotowicz; H Kröger; T Kwok; O Lamy; A Langhammer; B Larijani; K Lippuner; D Mellström; T Merlijn; A Nordström; P Nordström; T W O'Neill; B Obermayer-Pietsch; C Ohlsson; E S Orwoll; J A Pasco; F Rivadeneira; B Schei; A-M Schott; E J Shiroma; K Siggeirsdottir; E M Simonsick; E Sornay-Rendu; R Sund; K M A Swart; P Szulc; J Tamaki; D J Torgerson; N M van Schoor; T P van Staa; J Vila; N J Wareham; N C Wright; N Yoshimura; M C Zillikens; M Zwart; N C Harvey; M Lorentzon; W D Leslie; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 5.071

Review 2.  Population-Based Osteoporosis Primary Prevention and Screening for Quality of Care in Osteoporosis, Current Osteoporosis Reports.

Authors:  William D Leslie; Carolyn J Crandall
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 5.096

3.  Cross-sectional osteoporotic risk prediction with the FRAX without BMD in male and female patients attending OPD in a community health center of Bihar.

Authors:  Rashmi Bhujade; Anupama Srivastava; Kishor N Chinchodkar; Pawan Pathak; Tarique Ibrahim
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2022-06-30

Review 4.  Role of Bisphosphonate Therapy in Patients with Osteopenia: A Systemic Review.

Authors:  Shumaila M Iqbal; Iqra Qamar; Cassandra Zhi; Anum Nida; Hafiz M Aslam
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-02-27

5.  Healthcare Policy Changes in Osteoporosis Can Improve Outcomes and Reduce Costs in the United States.

Authors:  E Michael Lewiecki; Jesse D Ortendahl; Jacqueline Vanderpuye-Orgle; Andreas Grauer; Jorge Arellano; Jeffrey Lemay; Amanda L Harmon; Michael S Broder; Andrea J Singer
Journal:  JBMR Plus       Date:  2019-05-13
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.