Literature DB >> 28520513

Rectal Mucinous Adenocarcinoma: MR Imaging Assessment of Response to Concurrent Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy-A Hypothesis-generating Study.

Seung Hyun Park1, Joon Seok Lim1, Jinae Lee1, Ha Yan Kim1, Woong Sub Koom1, Hyuk Hur1, Mi-Suk Park1, Myeong-Jin Kim1, Honsoul Kim1.   

Abstract

Purpose To develop a system for assessment of tumor regression grade (TRG) with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging that is applicable to rectal mucinous adenocarcinoma (RMAC) and to obtain a preliminary evaluation of the association of MR imaging assessment of TRG with response to preoperative concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy (CCRT). Materials and Methods This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board, and informed consent was waived. Pre- and post-CCRT MR images of 59 patients with RMAC (median age, 59 years; range, 29-80 years; 42 men [median age, 59 years; range, 36-80 years] and 17 women [median age, 57 years; range, 29-79 years]) who underwent CCRT and subsequent elective resection from July 2005 to June 2015 were analyzed. Two experienced gastrointestinal radiologists independently analyzed imaging parameters such as T stage, mesorectal fascia status, extramural vascular invasion status, and TRG by using modified criteria developed for assessment of RMAC. Interobserver variability was calculated with weighted κ analysis, and disagreement was settled in consensus. MR imaging TRG results were compared with those from pathologic TRG analysis (Mandard grade). Logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate associations between imaging parameters and pathologic TRG. Results There was moderate to substantial agreement for imaging parameters (post-CCRT T stage-weighted κ, 0.7134; post-CCRT mesorectal fascia status, 0.618; TRG, 0.5023). Modified MR imaging TRG results were significantly associated with pathologic responsiveness (responsive group, Mandard grade 1 or 2; nonresponsive group, Mandard grades 3-5; P = .023). Results of univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses indicated that MR imaging TRG was the only factor significantly associated with CCRT responsiveness (univariate analysis, P = .023; multivariate analysis, P = .0261). Conclusion The modified MR imaging assessment of TRG was associated with treatment response to CCRT in patients with RMAC. © RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28520513     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017162657

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  7 in total

Review 1.  Multimodality Imaging Review of Anorectal and Perirectal Diseases With Histological, Endoscopic, and Operative Correlation, Part I: Anatomy and Neoplasms.

Authors:  Guillermo P Sangster; David H Ballard; Miguel Nazar; Richard Tsai; Maren Donato; Horacio B D'Agostino
Journal:  Curr Probl Diagn Radiol       Date:  2018-07-29

Review 2.  The importance of MRI for rectal cancer evaluation.

Authors:  Maria Clara Fernandes; Marc J Gollub; Gina Brown
Journal:  Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 2.388

Review 3.  Response Assessment with MRI after Chemoradiotherapy in Rectal Cancer: Current Evidences.

Authors:  Nieun Seo; Honsoul Kim; Min Soo Cho; Joon Seok Lim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 3.500

4.  Colonic mucinous adenocarcinoma causing intussusception and distant metastasis: A case report.

Authors:  Xiaohui Xu; Zhiyuan Kong; Ke Yi; Bing Wang; Qingjun Lei; Yi Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  Radiomics-Based Preoperative Prediction of Lymph Node Status Following Neoadjuvant Therapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Xuezhi Zhou; Yongju Yi; Zhenyu Liu; Zhiyang Zhou; Bingjia Lai; Kai Sun; Longfei Li; Liyu Huang; Yanqiu Feng; Wuteng Cao; Jie Tian
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  MRI Evaluation of Complete and Near-Complete Response after Neoadjuvant Therapy in Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Anca-Raluca Popita; Cosmin Lisencu; Adriana Rusu; Cristian Popita; Calin Cainap; Alexandru Irimie; Liliana Resiga; Alina Munteanu; Zsolt Fekete; Radu Badea
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-07

7.  Rectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma: Post-Chemoradiotherapy Evaluation by MRI and Corresponding to Pathology.

Authors:  Yin Zhou; Qingshu Li; Yun Mao
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-03-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.