Literature DB >> 28520461

Clinical Outcome After Arthroscopic Debridement and Microfracture for Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Capitellum.

Rens Bexkens1,2,3, Kim I M van den Ende1, Paul T Ogink3,4, Christiaan J A van Bergen1, Michel P J van den Bekerom5, Denise Eygendaal1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Various surgical treatment techniques have been developed to treat capitellar osteochondritis dissecans; however, the optimal technique remains the subject of ongoing debate.
PURPOSE: To evaluate clinical outcomes after arthroscopic debridement and microfracture for advanced capitellar osteochondritis dissecans. STUDY
DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS: Between 2008 and 2015, the authors followed 77 consecutive patients (81 elbows) who underwent arthroscopic debridement and microfracture, and loose body removal if needed, for advanced capitellar osteochondritis dissecans. Seventy-one patients (75 elbows) with a minimum follow-up of 1 year were included. The mean age was 16 years (SD, ±3.3 years; range, 11-26 years) and the mean follow-up length was 3.5 years (SD, ±1.9 years; range, 1-8.2 years). Based on CT and/or MRI results, 71 lesions were classified as unstable and 4 as stable. Clinical elbow outcome (pain, function, and social-psychological effect) was assessed using the Oxford Elbow Score (OES) at final follow-up (OES range, 0-48). Range of motion and return to sports were recorded. Multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to determine predictors of postoperative OES.
RESULTS: Intraoperatively, there were 3 grade 1 lesions, 2 grade 2 lesions, 10 grade 3 lesions, 1 grade 4 lesion, and 59 grade 5 lesions. The mean postoperative OES was 40.8 (SD, ±8.0). An open capitellar physis was a predictor of better elbow outcome (5.8-point increase; P = .025), as well as loose body removal/grade 4-5 lesions (6.9-point increase; P = .0020) and shorter duration of preoperative symptoms (1.4-point increase per year; P = .029). Flexion slightly improved from 134° to 139° ( P < .001); extension deficit slightly improved from 8° to 3° ( P < .001). Pronation ( P = .47) and supination did not improve ( P = .065). Thirty-seven patients (55%) returned to their primary sport at the same level, and 5 patients (7%) returned to a lower level. Seventeen patients (25%) did not return to sport due to elbow-related symptoms, and 10 patients (13%) did not return due to non-elbow-related reasons. No complications were recorded.
CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic debridement and microfracture for advanced capitellar osteochondritis dissecans provide good clinical results, especially in patients with open growth plate, loose body removal, and shorter duration of symptoms. However, only 62% of patients in this study returned to sports.

Entities:  

Keywords:  arthroscopy; capitellum; debridement; microfracture; osteochondritis dissecans

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28520461     DOI: 10.1177/0363546517704842

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  13 in total

Review 1.  Elbow Injuries in the Adolescent Thrower.

Authors:  Timothy B Griffith; James Kercher; S Clifton Willimon; Crystal Perkins; Xavier A Duralde
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-03

2.  Interobserver reliability of the classification of capitellar osteochondritis dissecans using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Rens Bexkens; F Joseph Simeone; Denise Eygendaal; Michel Pj van den Bekerom; Luke S Oh
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2019-01-16

3.  Outcomes of Arthroscopic Surgical Treatment of Osteochondral Lesions of the Elbow in Pediatric and Adolescent Athletes.

Authors:  Sachin Allahabadi; Jessica K Bryant; Ashish Mittal; Nirav K Pandya
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-11-09

4.  Cartilage Repair by Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes: Preclinical and Clinical Trial Update and Perspectives.

Authors:  Shahrbano Jahangir; Mojtaba Khozaei Ravari; Leila Taghiyar; Mohammad Amin Shamekhi; Mohamadreza Baghaban Eslaminejad
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 5.  Osteochondritis Dissecans: Current Understanding of Epidemiology, Etiology, Management, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Michael M Chau; Mikhail A Klimstra; Kelsey L Wise; Jutta M Ellermann; Ferenc Tóth; Cathy S Carlson; Bradley J Nelson; Marc A Tompkins
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 6.558

6.  Performance of the PROMIS in Patients Undergoing 3 Common Elbow Procedures.

Authors:  Edward O Rojas; Natalie Glass; Jessell Owens; Chris A Anthony; Matthew Bollier; Brian R Wolf; Carolyn Hettrich
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-06-17

Review 7.  Both Debridement and Microfracture Produce Excellent Results for Osteochondritis Dissecans Lesions of the Capitellum: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Richard J McLaughlin; Devin P Leland; Christopher D Bernard; Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo; Mark E Morrey; Shawn W O'Driscoll; Christopher L Camp
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-03-16

Review 8.  Osteochondritis Dissecans of Smaller Joints: The Elbow.

Authors:  Juergen Bruns; Mathias Werner; Christian R Habermann
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  Treatment of osteochondritis dissecans of the humeral capitellum with a fragment fixation method using absorbable pins.

Authors:  Hiroshi Kiyomatsu; Jun Takeba; Hiroshi Imai; Taketsugu Fujibuchi; Takashi Inoue; Akihiro Jono; Kazunori Hino; Hiromasa Miura
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-03-08

10.  Early Clinical Results of Arthroscopically Assisted Drilling via the Radius in a Distal-to-Proximal Direction for Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Elbow.

Authors:  Yuji Arai; Kunio Hara; Hiroaki Inoue; Ginjiro Minami; Yoshikazu Kida; Hiroyoshi Fujiwara; Toshikazu Kubo
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-09-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.