Literature DB >> 28517942

Cognitive bias and paw preference in the domestic dog (Canis familiaris).

Deborah L Wells1, Peter G Hepper1, Adam D S Milligan1, Shanis Barnard1.   

Abstract

Limb use, an indicator of hemispheric functioning, may be a useful predictor of cognitive bias and hence vulnerability to welfare risk. The relationship between cognitive bias and motor asymmetry, however, has been subject to little investigation. This study explored the association between motor asymmetry and cognitive bias in the domestic dog, a species that displays lateral bias in the form of paw preferences and exhibits positive and negative affective states. Thirty pet dogs had their paw preferences assessed using the Kong ball test. The subjects' affective state was assessed using a cognitive bias test in which the animals' latency to approach a bowl placed in 1 of 3 ambiguous positions was recorded. Animals veering more toward a left-paw preference were found to be significantly slower to approach the bowl placed in 1 of the ambiguous positions than ambilateral or right-pawed dogs. Left-pawed subjects approached the bowl located at the 3 ambiguous positions at roughly the same speed, while ambilateral and right-pawed animals became increasingly slower to approach the bowl the further it was located from the baited food bowl. The study points to a possible relationship between cognitive bias and paw preference in the dog, with left-pawed animals being more negative or "pessimistic" in their cognitive outlook than right-pawed or ambilateral individuals. It is proposed that limb preference testing might offer a more practical and straightforward way of identifying individuals at risk from poor welfare by virtue of how they perceive the world than more time-consuming cognitive bias tests. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28517942     DOI: 10.1037/com0000080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9940            Impact factor:   2.231


  7 in total

1.  A promising novel judgement bias test to evaluate affective states in dogs (Canis familiaris).

Authors:  Carlotta Burani; Annalisa Pelosi; Paola Valsecchi
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 2.899

2.  Personality traits affecting judgement bias task performance in dogs (Canis familiaris).

Authors:  Shanis Barnard; Deborah L Wells; Adam D S Milligan; Gareth Arnott; Peter G Hepper
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Laterality as a Tool for Assessing Breed Differences in Emotional Reactivity in the Domestic Cat, Felis silvestris catus.

Authors:  Deborah L Wells; Louise J McDowell
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Effect of Stroking on Serotonin, Noradrenaline, and Cortisol Levels in the Blood of Right- and Left-Pawed Dogs.

Authors:  Mirosław Karpiński; Katarzyna Ognik; Aleksandra Garbiec; Piotr Czyżowski; Magdalena Krauze
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  The effect of repeated testing on judgement bias in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris).

Authors:  Clara Wilson; Nathan Hall; Edgar O Aviles-Rosa; Kerry Campbell; Gareth Arnott; Catherine Reeve
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 2.899

6.  Dog cognitive development: a longitudinal study across the first 2 years of life.

Authors:  Emily E Bray; Margaret E Gruen; Gitanjali E Gnanadesikan; Daniel J Horschler; Kerinne M Levy; Brenda S Kennedy; Brian A Hare; Evan L MacLean
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 3.084

7.  Using judgment bias test in pet and shelter dogs (Canis familiaris): Methodological and statistical caveats.

Authors:  Carlotta Burani; Shanis Barnard; Deborah Wells; Annalisa Pelosi; Paola Valsecchi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.