Literature DB >> 28517937

Cellular Shuttles: Monocytes/Macrophages Exhibit Transendothelial Transport of Nanoparticles under Physiological Flow.

Thomas L Moore, Daniel Hauser, Thomas Gruber1, Barbara Rothen-Rutishauser, Marco Lattuada, Alke Petri-Fink, Ruth Lyck1.   

Abstract

A major hurdle in the development of biomedical nanoparticles (NP) is understanding how they interact with complex biological systems and navigate biological barriers to arrive at pathological targets. It is becoming increasingly evident that merely controlling particle physicochemical properties may not be sufficient to mediate particle biodistribution in dynamic environments. Thus, researchers are increasingly turning toward more complex but likewise more physiological in vitro systems to study particle--cell/particle-system interactions. An emerging paradigm is to utilize naturally migratory cells to act as so-called "Trojan horses" or cellular shuttles. We report here the use of monocytes/macrophages to transport NP across a confluent endothelial cell layer using a microfluidic in vitro model. With a custom-built flow chamber, we showed that physiological shear stress, when compared to low flow or static conditions, increased NP uptake by macrophages. We further provided a mathematical explanation for the effect of flow on NP uptake, namely that the physical exposure times of NP to cells is dictated by shear stress (i.e., flow rate) and results in increased particle uptake under flow. This study was extended to a multicellular, hydrodynamic in vitro model. Because monocytes are cells that naturally translocate across biological barriers, we utilized a monocyte/macrophage cell line as cellular NP transporters across an endothelial layer. In this exploratory study, we showed that monocyte/macrophage cells adhere to an endothelial layer and dynamically interact with the endothelial cells. The monocytes/macrophages took up NP and diapedesed across the endothelial layer with NP accumulating within the cellular uropod. These data illustrate that monocytes/macrophages may therefore act as active shuttles to deliver particles across endothelial barriers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Trojan horse; biological barriers; cellular hitchhiker; flow; nanoparticle; nanoparticle shuttle; shear stress; transendothelial transport

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28517937     DOI: 10.1021/acsami.7b03479

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces        ISSN: 1944-8244            Impact factor:   9.229


  10 in total

1.  VLA-4 mediated adhesion of melanoma cells on the blood-brain barrier is the critical cue for melanoma cell intercalation and barrier disruption.

Authors:  Ana B García-Martín; Pascale Zwicky; Thomas Gruber; Christoph Matti; Federica Moalli; Jens V Stein; David Francisco; Gaby Enzmann; Mitchell P Levesque; Ekkehard Hewer; Ruth Lyck
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 6.200

2.  Nanoscale Functionalized Particles with Rotation-Controlled Capture in Shear Flow.

Authors:  Molly K Shave; Surachate Kalasin; Eric Ying; Maria M Santore
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 9.229

Review 3.  Targeting Inflammation With Nanosized Drug Delivery Platforms in Cardiovascular Diseases: Immune Cell Modulation in Atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Antonio Cervadoro; Roberto Palomba; Giuseppe Vergaro; Roberta Cecchi; Luca Menichetti; Paolo Decuzzi; Michele Emdin; Stefano Luin
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2018-11-27

Review 4.  Engineered Polymeric Materials for Biological Applications: Overcoming Challenges of the Bio-Nano Interface.

Authors:  Joshua D Simpson; Samuel A Smith; Kristofer J Thurecht; Georgina Such
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-02       Impact factor: 4.329

Review 5.  The Therapeutic Potential of Nanoparticles to Reduce Inflammation in Atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Armita Mahdavi Gorabi; Nasim Kiaie; Željko Reiner; Federico Carbone; Fabrizio Montecucco; Amirhossein Sahebkar
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2019-08-26

Review 6.  Nanocarrier-based drug combination therapy for glioblastoma.

Authors:  Mengnan Zhao; Demian van Straten; Marike L D Broekman; Véronique Préat; Raymond M Schiffelers
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 11.556

7.  Increased Uptake of Silica Nanoparticles in Inflamed Macrophages but Not upon Co-Exposure to Micron-Sized Particles.

Authors:  Eva Susnik; Patricia Taladriz-Blanco; Barbara Drasler; Sandor Balog; Alke Petri-Fink; Barbara Rothen-Rutishauser
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 6.600

8.  Development of Microfluidic, Serum-Free Bronchial Epithelial Cells-on-a-Chip to Facilitate a More Realistic In vitro Testing of Nanoplastics.

Authors:  Govind Gupta; Srikanth Vallabani; Romain Bordes; Kunal Bhattacharya; Bengt Fadeel
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2021-10-06

Review 9.  In Vitro Models of Biological Barriers for Nanomedical Research.

Authors:  Flavia Carton; Manuela Malatesta
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 10.  Protein-Based Nanoparticles for the Imaging and Treatment of Solid Tumors: The Case of Ferritin Nanocages, a Narrative Review.

Authors:  Francesco Mainini; Arianna Bonizzi; Marta Sevieri; Leopoldo Sitia; Marta Truffi; Fabio Corsi; Serena Mazzucchelli
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 6.321

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.