Literature DB >> 28516980

Modern management of paediatric obstructive salivary disorders: long-term clinical experience.

P Capaccio1,2, P Canzi3, M Gaffuri1, A Occhini3, M Benazzo3, F Ottaviani4, L Pignataro1,5.   

Abstract

Recent technological improvements in head and neck field have changed diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for salivary disorders. Diagnosis is now based on colour Doppler ultrasonography (US), magnetic resonance (MR) sialography and cone beam 3D computed tomography (CT), and extra- and intracorporeal lithotripsy, interventional sialendscopy and sialendoscopy-assisted surgery are used as minimally invasive, conservative procedures for functional preservation of the affected gland. We evaluated the results of our long-term experience in the management of paediatric obstructive salivary disorders. The study involved a consecutive series of 66 children (38 females) whose obstructive salivary symptoms caused by juvenile recurrent parotitis (JRP) (n = 32), stones (n = 20), ranula (n = 9) and ductal stenosis (n = 5). 45 patients underwent interventional sialendoscopy for JRP, stones and stenoses, 12 a cycle of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL), three sialendoscopy-assisted transoral surgery, one drainage, six marsupialisation, and two suturing of a ranula. Three children underwent combined ESWL and interventional sialendoscopy, and seven a secondary procedure. An overall successful result was obtained in 90.9% of cases. None of the patients underwent traditional invasive sialadenectomy notwithstanding persistence of mild obstructive symptoms in six patients. No major complications were observed. Using a diagnostic work-up based on colour Doppler US, MR sialography and cone beam 3D TC, children with obstructive salivary disorders can be effectively treated in a modern minimally-invasive manner by extracorporeal and intracorporeal lithotripsy, interventional sialendoscopy and sialendoscopy-assisted transoral surgery; this approach guarantees a successful result in most patients, thus avoiding the need for invasive sialadenectomy while functionally preserving the gland. © Copyright by Società Italiana di Otorinolaringologia e Chirurgia Cervico-Facciale, Rome, Italy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Extracorporeal lithotripsy; Intracorporeal lithotripsy; Juvenile recurrent parotitis; Paediatric age; Ranula; Salivary calculi; Salivary duct stenosis; Sialendoscopy; Sialendoscopy-assisted transoral surgery; Ultrasonography

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28516980      PMCID: PMC5463525          DOI: 10.14639/0392-100X-1607

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital        ISSN: 0392-100X            Impact factor:   2.124


Introduction

Salivary gland disorders other than infectious conditions are less frequent in children than in adults, and neoplastic lesions are rare. The most frequent clinical manifestations are inflammatory events, which occur in about 10% of all salivary gland disorders . The wide range of factors involved in paediatric salivary gland disorders makes clinical management of childhood and adolescent salivary gland swelling challenging. Over the last 20 years or so, healthcare technological research has opened up new diagnostic and therapeutic perspectives. Recent radiological approaches have replaced conventional sialography for morphological investigation of the salivary gland duct system, and introduced more precise and non-invasive alternatives. The use of modern colour Doppler ultrasonography (US) allows a detailed assessment of salivary vascular anatomy and flow velocity . Magnetic resonance (MR) sialography is a non-ionising, non-allergenic means of exploring salivary gland ducts that uses a natural contrast medium (saliva) and does not require duct cannulation , and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) has been proposed as a cheaper alternative to traditional CT that reduces the amount of radiation exposure, especially in paediatric patients . First described in the 1990s, sialendoscopy is increasingly used because the advantage of seeing inside the duct system allows both diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Historical treatments such as partial or complete gland removal are being progressively abandoned in favour of minimally invasive approaches, which currently represent the new medical standard of care and have a considerable impact on paediatric patients. Nevertheless, there is still a relative paucity of published data concerning recurrent inflammatory disorders of the salivary glands in children -, and so the aim of this study was to analyse our 20-year experience of paediatric salivary obstructive disorders and their minimally invasive management.

Materials and methods

Between March 1994 and December 2015, 66 children with obstructive salivary gland or oral floor swelling (38 girls; mean age 7.9 years, range 1-16) were treated at the Departments of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery of Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Policlinico of Milan and Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo of Pavia. All patients had experienced at least one episode of parotid, submandibular or sublingual swelling. All patients underwent a complete ENT clinical examination, including inspection and palpation of the oral floor and major salivary glands, and high-resolution US and Doppler US assessments (Hitachi H21, 7.5 MHz, Hitachi High Technology Corporation Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) (Fig.1a); further investigations included MR sialography and CBCT (Fig. 1b) when necessary. Subsequently, various therapeutic options were adopted on the basis the clinical and radiological findings.
Fig. 1.

High-resolution US of a patient affected by JRP, showing typical hypoechoic areas and heterogeneous echoes (a); 3D-CBCT image showing a right submandibular stone in a 15-year-old boy.

High-resolution US of a patient affected by JRP, showing typical hypoechoic areas and heterogeneous echoes (a); 3D-CBCT image showing a right submandibular stone in a 15-year-old boy.

Therapeutic options

Diagnostic and interventional sialendoscopy

Sialendoscopy was performed under general anaesthesia with the patients in a half-seated position, with the head on a headrest turned towards the surgeon and mouth held open by a small gag. Endoscopic exploration of the ductal system of the affected gland was performed using semi-rigid salivary sialendoscopes (Fig. 2a) with outer diameters of 0.8-1.1 mm (Nahlieli and Erlangen sialendoscopes, Karl Storz®, Tuttlingen, Germany). Insertion through the salivary duct was preceded by appropriate dilation with standard salivary probes and conical dilators (Bowman probes 0000-6, Karl Storz®, Tuttlingen, Germany) and, when necessary, minimal papillotomy or limited minimal sialodochotomy. A sialendoscopic diagnosis of lithiasis was made by directly visualising the duct stone, and a diagnosis of duct stenosis was based on the grading system of Koch et al. . Additional sialendoscopic findings were represented by sialodochitis (Fig. 2b), mucous plugs and other duct anomalies. When necessary, interventional sialendoscopy was performed during the same procedure. Parotid or submandibular stones of < 3 mm were extracted using customised wire baskets (Fig. 2c) (Karl Storz®, Tuttlingen, Germany; NCircle, Cook Medical Inc®, Bloomington, IN, USA; Boston Scientific®, Marlborough, MA, USA), forceps (Karl Storz®, Tuttlingen, Germany), balloons (Karl Storz®, Tuttlingen, Germany), or a manual drill (Karl Storz®, Tuttlingen, Germany). An intraductal holmium:YAG laser lithotripter (Lumenis®, Dreieich, Germany) carried by a semi-flexible fibre (diameter 200 or 365 μm, with a power of 2.5-3.5 W, a rate of 5 Hz/sec, and energy of 0.5-0.7 J) was used to fragment stones of > 3 mm in diameter before extraction (Fig. 2d). Duct stenoses (Fig. 2e) were dilated by simple irrigation, balloon dilation and/or endoscopic stent positioning (venous catheter, Venflon, Artsana, Grandate, Italy; salivary polymeric stent, Optimed®, Ettlingen, Germany). At the end of the procedure the duct was washed with 2 mL of a betamethasone solution, corresponding to two vials of 4 mg/1 mL each. All patients received one-shot antibiotic therapy (amoxicillin and clavulanic acid) during the surgical procedure.
Fig. 2.

Endoscopic exploration of the ductal system of a right parotid gland by means of a semi-rigid sialendoscope (a); sialodochitis of the Stensen's duct (b); a stone trapped in a basket wire (c); intraductal fragmentation of a stone by means of holmium:YAG laser lithotripter (the red light of the laser is visible at the centre of the picture) (d); endoscopic image of a salivary duct stenosis (e).

Endoscopic exploration of the ductal system of a right parotid gland by means of a semi-rigid sialendoscope (a); sialodochitis of the Stensen's duct (b); a stone trapped in a basket wire (c); intraductal fragmentation of a stone by means of holmium:YAG laser lithotripter (the red light of the laser is visible at the centre of the picture) (d); endoscopic image of a salivary duct stenosis (e).

Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL)

Children with single or multiple parotid or submandibular calculi with a main diameter of 3-7 mm underwent a cycle of electromagnetic ESWL. A dedicated lithotripter with a mobile arm (Minilith SL -1, Storz Medical, Kreutzlingen, Switzerland) was used for treatment of salivary calculi. With the patient seated on a dentist's chair in a supine semi-reclined position, the ultrasound-guided shockwave generated by a small-diameter, cylindric, electromagnetic source was focused on the salivary stone using a parabolic reflector within the cushion. The 2.4 mm size of the shockwave focus allows the treatment of stones with diameters of ≥ 2.4 mm. The pulse frequency of the wave may vary from 0.5 to 2 Hz, and no more than 4000 shockwaves may be administered per session. Continuous sonographic monitoring allows direct visualisation of the degree of fragmentation during treatment, and avoids lesions to the surrounding tissues. A typical session of ESWL for sialolithiasis lasts approximately 30 min (median duration 29 min; range 20-37 min), and the treatment is repeated weekly.

Sialendoscopy-assisted transoral surgery for discrete and large submandibular stones of the main duct and hiloparenchymal region

Single or multiple palpable stones in the main duct and hiloparenchymal submandibular region were sometimes removed using a sialendoscopy-assisted oral procedure with headlight illumination and the patient under general anaesthesia. The mouth was held open by a small gag, the tongue was retracted and the oral floor was infiltrated with 5 mL of mepivacaine 25 mg/ml + adrenaline 5 mg/ ml. After dilating the duct with lacrimal probes (Fig. 3), a semi-rigid sialendoscope was inserted into the ductal system to localise the stone. A retropapillar incision was made over the oral floor mucosa, the tissue was bluntly dissected using sharp-tipped scissors and the duct was isolated from the surrounding tissues up to the second molar (the safe zone above the lingual nerve). The lingual nerve was identified running obliquely from the tongue, beneath the duct to the submandibular ganglion laterally, and then ascending medially over the submandibular duct as this enters the gland. The submandibular gland was identified by means of external digital pressure from the submandibular region. The duct was stretched using a fine haemostat swab and a minimal incision of the duct or the hiloparenchymal area was made over the stone, which was subsequently removed by means of a dedicated Freer elevator (Martin, Tuttlingen, Germany). The duct was then irrigated with normal saline to clean the hilar region and remove stone debris and, when possible, the ductal system was explored endoscopically to check for residual stones. In order to avoid the risk of post-operative duct stenosis a 14-20 G Venflon tube (Artsana, Grandate, Italy) was usually positioned through the papilla to stent the duct, and secured to the oral floor mucosa by means of a resorbable suture. Finally, the incision was closed using fine resorbable sutures (6.0 Vicryl) after positioning a fibrillar haemostatic net (Tabotamp, Johnson & Johnson Medical Limited, Gargrave, Skipton, UK) in order to avoid the risk of stricture or stenosis. The oral floor was then sutured using resorbable stitches (3.0 Vicryl).
Fig. 3.

To perform a sialendoscopy-assisted oral procedure, the mouth is held open by a small gag and the tongue retracted; the first surgical step is to dilate the duct with lacrimal probes.

To perform a sialendoscopy-assisted oral procedure, the mouth is held open by a small gag and the tongue retracted; the first surgical step is to dilate the duct with lacrimal probes.

Oral surgery for sublingual ranulas

Oral floor ranulas (Fig. 4a) were treated by various surgical procedures, mainly consisting of drainage, marsupialisation and suturing.
Fig. 4.

a left oral floor ranula in a female child (a); sutures in place 1 month after surgery, with no recurrence detectable (b).

a left oral floor ranula in a female child (a); sutures in place 1 month after surgery, with no recurrence detectable (b).

Drainage

With the patient under local anaesthesia, saliva was aspirated using a wide-bore needle to completely decompress the ranula, or the oral floor was incised using a size 11 scalpel.

Traditional and modified marsupialisation

Marsupialisation involved excising the ranula roof and suturing the lesion edges to the oral mucosa to maintain communication with the oral cavity; in the case of modified marsupialisation, suturing the ranula edges to the oral mucosa preceded the excision of the roof of the lesion . To avoid the resealing of the edge of the wound and subsequent recurrence, modified nasal packing (Merocel) was left over the floor of the lesion and sutured to the oral mucosa for three days.

Suturing

This technique has recently been described by Goodson et al. . Two or three interrupted 3-0 gauge silk sutures are placed through the edge of the sublingual gland around the origin of the ranula. The leaking salivary unit is caught within the sutures and strangulated. The sutures help to decompress the ranula and cause fibrosis and scarring of the sublingual gland at the site of the salivary leak. To improve the process of scarring and fibrosis, we modified McGurk's technique by using two additional silk sutures placed positioned perpendicularly to the others ì to create loose rings that favour saliva leakage from the pseudocyst, prevent puffiness of the cavity and aid the scarring process (Fig. 4b). The sutures do not always need to be removed as they often come away during the healing process.

Post-operative follow-up

All patients received antibiotic prophylaxis (combined amoxicillin sodium and clavulanic acid 50 mg/kg/day for seven days) and, when necessary, steroids (betamethasone 0.2 mg/kg/day) to reduce oedema of the mouth floor. The children who underwent oral surgery for stones or ranulas followed a cold semi-solid diet for the first week. All patients were clinically followed up after one week, and then minimally after one, six and 12 months. Therapeutic success was considered complete when the cause of the obstruction was completely removed or the patient was free of symptoms, and partial when the cause of the obstruction was not completely removed (e.g. residual stones of < 2 mm) or when the number of episodes of sialadenitis was reduced. The procedure was considered unsuccessful when the cause of obstruction was not removed or there was no change in the symptom-related condition of the patient. In the case of recurrent symptoms, a US evaluation was made six months after the procedure.

Results

Of the 66 patients analysed, 32 (48.5%) suffered from juvenile recurrent parotitis (JRP), 25 (37.9%) from recurrent obstructive sialadenitis and nine (13.6%) from oral floor ranulas (Table I). Baseline data and detailed outcomes are summarised in Tables II-V. The minimally invasive management of paediatric obstructive sialadenitis had a complete therapeutic effect on 90.9% of the glands. No temporary or persistent untoward effect was observed. None of the patients underwent invasive parotid or submandibular sialadenectomy. The results of each group of obstructive salivary gland disorders are discussed below.
Table I.

Paediatric recurrent sialadenitis, case series (1994-2015).

PathologyNumber of patients
JRP32
Oral floor ranula9
Parotid obstructive sialadenitis9
Submandibular obstructive sialadenitis16
Total66
Table II.

JRP series.

n
Number of patients32
Male13
Female19
Age (years)
Mean7.2
Median6
Range1 to 16
Side
Right13
Left9
Bilateral10
No. of recurrences/year before sialendoscopy
Mean4.6
Median4
Range2 to 10
No. of sialendoscopies42
Follow-up (months)
Mean23
Range6 to 55
No. of patients with recurrences after sialendoscopy7
Secondary SE procedures3
Medical therapies4
Table V.

Paediatric submandibular obstructive sialadenitis

n
Number of patients16
Male7
Female9
Age (years)
Mean8.6
Range5 to 15
Side
Right7
Left9
Bilateral0
Pathology
Sialolithiasis13
  Size of the stone (mm)
  Mean4.1
  Range1 to 7
Duct stenosis3
  Type ( * )
  I2
  II1
  III0
Duration of symptoms (months)
Mean6.5
Range1 to 13
Primary Treatment
ESWL7
Sialendoscopy-assisted procedures9
  Interventional SE6
  SE Endoral procedures2
  SE Transoral procedures1
Results of ESWL
No. of patients stone free after ESWL 5
Residual fragments < 2 mm2
Symptomatic1
Asymptomatic1
Results of sialendoscopic-assisted surgery
No. of patients stone free after sialendoscopy 5
Residual stones0
Recurrent duct stenosis1
Follow-up (months)
Mean11
Range6 to 15
Further treatments
Interventional sialendoscopy following ESWL1
Residual stones after 2nd sialendoscopy0
ESWL following failure sialendoscopy

Classification of duct stenosis according to Koch et al.

Paediatric recurrent sialadenitis, case series (1994-2015). JRP series.

Juvenile recurrent parotitis (JRP) (Table II)

Thirty-two patients with JRP were enrolled, making JRP the main cause of recurrent sialadenitis in our series. The patients were predominantly female (59.4%) and had a mean age of 7.2 years at the time of presentation. Approximately one-third (10/32) complained of bilateral involvement and recurrent parotitis before sialendoscopy occurred up to 10 times per year (mean 4.6 times). Diagnosis of JRP was based on clinical and imaging findings. In all cases, US scans detected typical multiple hypoechoic areas corresponding to duct dilation, and identified hyperplasic cells around the ducts. Colour Doppler US showed reactive intraparenchymal lymph nodes and gland hyper or hypo-vascularisation depending on whether JRP was in an acute or quiescent phase. Forty-two sialendoscopies were carried out under general anaesthesia, 10 of which were performed bilaterally during the same procedure. The secondary salivary ducts were explored in all cases, and third order branching was investigated in 40% of procedures. The most frequent endoscopic finding was a white wall appearance; main duct strictures (Koch's type I) and dilation were identified in all of the glands, and mucous plugs in 60% of the ducts. Interventional sialendoscopy involved irrigating the ductal system with saline solution and steroids. At the time of follow-up, 25 patients were free from symptoms with no episodes of recurrence, and seven patients experienced symptom recurrence, three of whom underwent secondary sialendoscopies with positive therapeutic effects and one was cured with medical therapy. Paediatric oral floor ranulas.

Paediatric oral floor ranula (Table III)

Six female and three male children had simple oral floor ranulas with a mean size of 1.3 cm; the right side was most frequently involved. The minimally invasive surgical treatments used were marsupialisation (six patients), suturing (two patients) and drainage (one patient). An immediate recurrence was observed in two of the six patients who underwent drainage followed by traditional and modified marsupialisation (2/6; 33%); there were no recurrences in patients who underwent the suturing technique. A secondary procedure was performed in recurred patients; one patient is still symptomatic. Paediatric parotid obstructive sialadenitis Classification of duct stenosis according to Koch et al. Paediatric submandibular obstructive sialadenitis Classification of duct stenosis according to Koch et al.

Recurrent obstructive sialadenitis (Tables IV-V)

The 25 treated patients showed a significant prevalence of submandibular over parotid involvement (64% vs 36%). There were no substantial differences in gender or side. Mean age at the time of enrolment was 8.9 years, and the symptoms had lasted for more than six months. Sialolithiasis was the most frequent cause of obstruction (20/25, 80%) of both parotid (7/9) and submandibular glands (13/16), and the mean stone size was 4.5 mm. ESWL was the primary treatment in 60% of cases (12/20): the stone-free rate after extracorporeal lithotripsy was 75% (9/12), and combined sialendoscopic stone removal was required in 25% of cases (3/12) because of residual symptomatic stone fragments. Thirteen interventional sialendoscopies were carried out, being the primary treatment in the case of eight duct stones and five duct stenoses. Among the patients with duct anomalies, one was a newborn infant with bilateral atresia of the papilla, which was treated by surgically incising the final tract of the submandibular duct followed by a sialendoscopic exploration of the duct system. Laser lithotripsy was performed in one eight yearsold patient with a 2 mm stone located in a secondary intraparenchymal branch of the duct system. Treatment failures (i.e. persistent salivary symptoms) were observed in two patients, one with a submandibular duct stenosis and the other with a parenchymal parotid stone.

Discussion

Twentieth century medical science has led to major advances in our knowledge of pathophysiology and the minimally invasive management of diseases. In the case of salivary gland disorders, modern approaches have proved to be effective in adults -, but there is relatively little published information concerning children -. We herein describe our 20-year experience of treating 66 paediatric patients with recurrent salivary obstructive disorders; to the best of our knowledge, this is the largest series of paediatric patients described in this field. All patients were treated using minimally invasive strategies, which were successful in 90.9% of cases; none of the patients required salivary gland removal. In all cases, we were able to enter the duct system using the latest generation of miniaturised sialendoscopes, and no adverse events were encountered. In line with previous reports , the most common cause of recurrent paediatric sialadenitis in our experience was JRP. Some studies have suggested that the pathophysiology of JRP is immune-mediated , and our colour Doppler US findings of reactive lymphatic tissue in all 42 glands seem to support this hypothesis, which is further supported by the therapeutic effect of steroid injections during operative sialendoscopy . In line with previous reports -, sialendoscopy proved to be remarkably beneficial as it reduced the mean frequency of JRP attacks from 4.6 to 0.5 per year, thus giving patients a better quality of life until puberty. Childhood sialolithiasis is quite rare, accounting for about 3-5% of all salivary stones . In our 20 cases, the modern methods of ESWL and sialendoscopy alone or combined with a transoral surgical approach led to complete clinical control in 95% of patients, although the combination of two techniques (ESWL and sialendoscopy) and the repetition of a transoral removal of a parenchymal stone was necessary in four cases. Stone lithotripsy was required to treat 65% of stones (13/20): 12 patients underwent ESWL and one patient sialendoscopy-assisted laser lithotripsy. ESWL was mainly used during the first 10 years of our experience , but the advent of sialendoscopy in 2001 allowed us to treat some patients with residual stone fragments after lithotripsy. Current technology is evolving towards intracorporeal laser or pneumatic fibre lithotripsy techniques, but only a few studies of intraductal laser and pneumatic lithotripsy have been published and no final conclusion can be drawn, especially in the case of children. The optimal management of oral floor ranula is still controversial -, and our experience reflects the evolution of various approaches. Traditional treatments include sclerotherapy, the removal of the cystic wall between the ranula and the sublingual gland, and drainage and marsupialisation of the ranula -. None of our patients underwent salivary gland and ranula excision but, as expected, ranula drainage was followed by immediate recurrence, and the rate of recurrence was 33% after marsupialisation; modified marsupialisation with cavity packing and the suture technique seemed to work better. The low rate of recurrence justifies the use of a minimally invasive alternative to invasive sublingual sialadenectomy in this population -.

Conclusions

Paediatric obstructive salivary disorders are not common and their treatment is made challenging by a number of factors: the patients' age, the large number of causes, and the limited data available in the literature. However, recent developments in our understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms of salivary gland disorders have positively influenced the progress of minimally invasive treatments. In our experience, a modern diagnostic and therapeutic approach using extracorporeal and intracorporeal lithotripsy, interventional sialendoscopy and sialendoscopy-assisted transoral surgery was successful in most cases, thus avoiding the need for invasive sialadenectomy. Future innovations in minimally invasive technologies will guarantee the functional preservation of the affected gland in all paediatric patients.
Table III.

Paediatric oral floor ranulas.

n
Number of patients9
Male3
Female6
Age (years)
Mean6.9
Range5 to 13
Side
Right7
Left2
Bilateral0
Size (cm)
Mean1.3
Range0.8 to 2
Treatment
Drainage1
Marsupialisation6
Suture2
Follow-up (months)
Mean11
Range4 to 16
No. of recurrences after 1st treatment2
Secondary procedures2
Patients still symptomatic after 2nd treatment1
Table IV.

Paediatric parotid obstructive sialadenitis

n
Number of patients9
Male5
Female4
Age (years)
Mean9.2
Range5 to 13
Side
Right6
Left3
Bilateral0
Pathology
Sialolithiasis7
  Size of the stone (mm)
  Mean4.97
  Range2 to 7
Duct stenosis2
  Type*
  I2
  II0
  III0
Duration of symptoms (months)
Mean8.2
Range1 to 30
Primary Treatment
ESWL5
Interventional sialendoscopy4
Results of ESWL
No. of patients stone free after ESWL3
Residual fragments < 2 mm2
Symptomatic2
Asymptomatic0
Results of sialendoscopy
No. of patients stone free after sialendoscopy 1
Residual stones1
Recurrent duct stenosis0
Follow-up (months)
Mean12
Range6 to 14
Further treatments
Interventional sialendoscopy following ESWL2
Residual stones after 2nd sialendoscopy0
ESWL following failure sialendoscopy1

Classification of duct stenosis according to Koch et al.

  34 in total

Review 1.  Sialendoscopy for the management of juvenile recurrent parotitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jayant Ramakrishna; Julie Strychowsky; Michael Gupta; Doron D Sommer
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Sublingual ranula: a closer look to its surgical management.

Authors:  Carmen Mortellaro; Susanna Dall'Oca; Alberta Greco Lucchina; Antonino Castiglia; Gianpietro Farronato; Emanuele Fenini; Gaetano Marenzi; Oreste Trosino; Carlo Cafiero; Gilberto Sammartino
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.046

3.  Minimally invasive treatment of oral ranulae: adaption to an old technique.

Authors:  A M C Goodson; K F B Payne; K George; M McGurk
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 1.651

Review 4.  Pediatric sialadenitis.

Authors:  Carrie L Francis; Christopher G Larsen
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 3.346

5.  Pediatric sialendoscopy in Asians: A preliminary report.

Authors:  Chin-Hui Su; Kuo-Sheng Lee; Jui-Hsien Hsu; Fei-Peng Lee; Hsiang-Yu Lin; Shuan-Pei Lin; Shih-Han Hung
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 2.545

6.  Pediatric salivary gland obstructive swelling: sialendoscopic approach.

Authors:  Frederic Faure; Stephanie Querin; Pavel Dulguerov; Patrick Froehlich; Francois Disant; Francis Marchal
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Pediatric sialendoscopy: a 5-year experience at a single institution.

Authors:  Christine Martins-Carvalho; Isabelle Plouin-Gaudon; Stéphanie Quenin; Jérome Lesniak; Patrick Froehlich; Francis Marchal; Frederic Faure
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2010-01

Review 8.  The role of adenectomy for salivary gland obstructions in the era of sialendoscopy and lithotripsy.

Authors:  Pasquale Capaccio; Sara Torretta; Lorenzo Pignataro
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.346

9.  Recurrent parotitis in selective IgA deficiency.

Authors:  Vered Shkalim; Yehudit Monselise; Ronen Mosseri; Yaron Finkelstein; Ben Zion Garty
Journal:  Pediatr Allergy Immunol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 6.377

10.  Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) sialography--an adjunct to salivary gland ultrasonography in the evaluation of recurrent salivary gland swelling.

Authors:  Tobias Kroll; Andreas May; Claus Wittekindt; Christopher Kähling; Shachi Jenny Sharma; Hans-Peter Howaldt; Jens Peter Klussmann; Philipp Streckbein
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol       Date:  2015-09-14
View more
  3 in total

1.  Feasibility of 3D printed salivary duct models for sialendoscopic skills training: preliminary report.

Authors:  Pietro Canzi; Pasquale Capaccio; Stefania Marconi; Giorgio Conte; Lorenzo Preda; Irene Avato; Federico Aprile; Michele Gaffuri; Antonio Occhini; Lorenzo Pignataro; Ferdinando Auricchio; Marco Benazzo
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Multiple Faces of Cervical Lesions in Children.

Authors:  Stefana Maria Moisa; Nicolau Andrei; Raluca-Daniela Balcan; Ingrith Miron; Elena Țarcă; Lăcrămioara Butnariu; Elena Cojocaru; Maria Magdalena Leon-Constantin; Cristian Constantin Budacu; Laura Mihaela Trandafir
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-24

3.  The role of magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance sialography in the evaluation of salivary sialolithiasis: radiologic-endoscopic correlation.

Authors:  Omneya Gamaleldin; Emad A Magdy; Hesham Zoheir; Gihan Mohamed Shehata; Nermeen Elsebaie
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2022-08-05
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.