| Literature DB >> 28516902 |
Shuo Ma1,2, Yue Jiang1,2, Weiting Huang2, Xintao Li1,2, Shuzhuang Li3.
Abstract
Heart transplantation has evolved as the criterion standard therapy for end-stage heart failure, but its efficacy is limited by the development of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), a unique and rapidly progressive form of atherosclerosis in heart transplant recipients. Here, we briefly review the key processes in the development of CAV during heart transplantation and highlight the roles of transient receptor potential (TRP) channels in these processes during heart transplantation. Understanding the roles of TRP channels in contributing to the key procedures for the development of CAV during heart transplantation could provide basic scientific knowledge for the development of new preventive and therapeutic approaches to manage patients with CAV after heart transplantation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28516902 PMCID: PMC5444344 DOI: 10.12659/msm.901920
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
Figure 1Pathogenesis of CAV. Recipients with transplant-associated risk factors and classical risk factors have severe vascular inflammation, endothelial injury and dysfunction, and this stimulates vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation through a multifactorial and complex process. Then, vascular inflammation and endothelium dysfunction, as well as vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration, in these 3 key processes will ultimately cause coronary diffused concentric intimal thickening and CAV.
Figure 2TRP channels in vascular endothelium dysfunction and smooth muscle cell proliferation. Stimulation of the vascular endothelial PLC system, mainly by G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) and receptor protein tyrosine kinases (RTK), by Ach, bradykinin, VEGF, and other ligands are capable of generating IP3 and DAG. On the one hand, IP3 can deplete the endothelium reticulum (ER) Ca2+ store. This store depletion process activates signaling molecules, which mediate Ca2+ entry through some TRP channels (such as TRPC1 and -C4) acting as a store-operated Ca2+ entry (SOCE). On the other hand, DAG can directly stimulate some TRP channels (such as TRPC6), which act as a receptor-operated Ca2+ entry (ROCE). In addition to the above mechanisms, external stimuli such as capsaicin and shear stress can directly act on some specific TRP channels (such as TRPV1, -V4, TRPP1-P2 complex, and TRPM7) to induce Ca2+ influx. The increased Ca2+ concentration has 3 main functions: Firstly, the elevation of [Ca2+]i can open endothelial small-conductance KCa (SKCa) and intermediate-conductance KCa (IKCa) channels, resulting in K+ efflux and endothelium hyperpolarization, which be directly transmitted to SMC through corresponding gap junctions and ultimately causes vascular SMC relaxation. Secondly, the elevation of [Ca2+]i activates the Ca2+ -dependent protein kinase C (PKC) isoform, PKC-α, which mediates cytoskeletal reorganization and disassembly of vascular endothelial cadherin at the adherens junctions, and ultimately regulates endothelium permeability. Finally, the elevation of [Ca2+]i forms Ca2+-CaM (calmodulin), which then activates eNOS and leads to the amplified production of NO. NO itself can modulate some TRP channels through feedback mechanisms to preserve homeostasis; it diffuses out of endothelium into adjacent SMCs and stimulates guanylate cyclase (GC), which leads to the activation of PKG and SMC relaxation to regulate vascular tone, and endothelium-derived NO can also inhibit vascular SMC proliferation. In SMCs, stimulation of the vascular PLC system by platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) and other ligands is capable of generating IP3 and DAG, and IP3 acts on TRPC1, -C3, -C4, -C5, and -C6 to increase [Ca2+]i through a mechanism similar to that found in the endothelium. DAG can also directly stimulate TRPC3, -C6, and -C7, which acts as a receptor-operated Ca2+ entry (ROCE) in this process. The elevated [Ca2+]i of SMCs then initiates the proliferation response of SMCs by stimulating various transcription factors.