Literature DB >> 28516470

Survived so what? Identifying priorities for research with children and families post-paediatric intensive care unit.

Joseph C Manning1,2,3, Pippa Hemingway4, Sarah A Redsell5.   

Abstract

The involvement of patients and the public in the development, implementation and evaluation of health care services and research is recognized to have tangible benefits in relation to effectiveness and credibility. However, despite >96% of children and young people surviving critical illness or injury, there is a paucity of published reports demonstrating their contribution to informing the priorities for aftercare services and outcomes research. We aimed to identify the service and research priorities for Paediatric Intensive Care Unit survivors with children and young people, their families and other stakeholders. We conducted a face-to-face, multiple-stakeholder consultation event, held in the Midlands (UK), to provide opportunities for experiences, views and priorities to be elicited. Data were gathered using write/draw and tell and focus group approaches. An inductive content analytical approach was used to categorize and conceptualize feedback. A total of 26 individuals attended the consultation exercise, including children and young people who were critical care survivors; their siblings; parents and carers; health professionals; academics; commissioners; and service managers. Consultation findings indicated that future services, interventions and research must be holistic and family-centred. Children and young people advisors reported priorities that focused on longer-term outcomes, whereas adult advisors identified priorities that mapped against the pathways of care. Specific priorities included developing and testing interventions that address unmet communication and information needs. Furthermore, initiatives to optimize the lives and longer-term functional and psycho-social outcomes of Paediatric Intensive Care Unit survivors were identified. This consultation exercise provides further evidence of the value of meaningful patient and public involvement in identifying the priorities for research and services for Paediatric Intensive Care Unit survivors and illuminates differences in proposed priorities between children, young people and adult advisors.
© 2017 British Association of Critical Care Nurses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Paediatric intensive/critical care; Paediatrics; Research; Research methodology; Short- and long-term patient outcome from intensive care

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28516470     DOI: 10.1111/nicc.12298

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurs Crit Care        ISSN: 1362-1017            Impact factor:   2.325


  8 in total

1.  Associations of Participation-Focused Strategies and Rehabilitation Service Use With Caregiver Stress After Pediatric Critical Illness.

Authors:  Jessica M Jarvis; Karen Choong; Mary A Khetani
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 2.  Ventilatory support at home for children: A joint position paper from the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand/Australasian Sleep Association.

Authors:  Jasneek Chawla; Elizabeth A Edwards; Amanda L Griffiths; Gillian M Nixon; Sadasivam Suresh; Jacob Twiss; Moya Vandeleur; Karen A Waters; Andrew C Wilson; Susan Wilson; Andrew Tai
Journal:  Respirology       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 6.175

3.  Therapeutic Hypothermia After Pediatric Cardiac Arrest-Call Me on My Cell Phone?

Authors:  Ericka L Fink; Karen Choong
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 3.624

4.  Children and young people's contributions to public involvement and engagement activities in health-related research: A scoping review.

Authors:  Alison Rouncefield-Swales; Jane Harris; Bernie Carter; Lucy Bray; Toni Bewley; Rachael Martin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Study protocol for a multicentre longitudinal mixed methods study to explore the Outcomes of ChildrEn and fAmilies in the first year after paediatric Intensive Care: the OCEANIC study.

Authors:  Joseph C Manning; Jos M Latour; Martha A Q Curley; Elizabeth S Draper; Tahseen Jilani; Philip R Quinlan; R Scott Watson; Janet E Rennick; Gillian Colville; Neethi Pinto; Asam Latif; Emma Popejoy; Jane Coad
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-05-17       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Development and validation of the needs of children questionnaire: An instrument to measure children's self-reported needs in hospital.

Authors:  Mandie Foster; Lisa Whitehead; Diana Arabiat
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 3.187

7.  Protocol for a multicentre longitudinal mixed-methods study: feeding and survivorship outcomes in previously healthy young paediatric Intensive care survivors (the PIES Study).

Authors:  Kathryn Morton; Anne-Sophie Emma Darlington; L V Marino
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Incorporating parent, former patient and clinician perspectives in the design of a national UK double-cluster, randomised controlled trial addressing uncertainties in preterm nutrition.

Authors:  William Lammons; Becky Moss; Cheryl Battersby; Victoria Cornelius; Daphne Babalis; Neena Modi
Journal:  BMJ Paediatr Open       Date:  2021-06-15
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.