Steven J Elmer1, Dakota J Anderson2,3, Travis R Wakeham4, Matthew A Kilgas2,4, John J Durocher4, Stan L Lindstedt5, Paul C LaStayo6. 1. Department of Kinesiology and Integrative Physiology, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, 49931, USA. sjelmer@mtu.edu. 2. Department of Kinesiology and Integrative Physiology, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, 49931, USA. 3. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, 49931, USA. 4. Department of Biological Sciences, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, 49931, USA. 5. Department of Biology, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, 86001, USA. 6. Department of Physical Therapy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Eccentric leg cycling (cycle ergometry adapted to impose muscle lengthening contractions) offers an effective exercise for restoring lower-body muscular function, maintaining health, and improving performance in clinical and athletic populations. PURPOSE: We extended this model to the upper body and evaluated the effectiveness of a 7-week eccentric arm cycling (ECCarm) intervention to improve upper-body muscular function. We also explored whether ECCarm would alter arterial function. METHODS: Participants performed ECCarm (n = 9) or concentric arm cycling (CONarm; n = 8) 3×/week while training intensity increased (5-20 min, 60-70% upper-body peak heart rate). Maximum elbow extensor strength, upper-body concentric power, and peripheral and central arterial stiffness were assessed before and after training. RESULTS: During training, heart rates and perceived exertion did not differ between groups (~68% upper-body peak heart rate, ~12 Borg units, both P > 0.05), whereas power during ECCarm was ~2× that for CONarm (122 ± 43 vs. 59 ± 20 W, P < 0.01). Muscle soreness for ECCarm was greater than CONarm (P = 0.02), however, soreness was minimal for both groups (<0.50 cm). Following training, ECCarm exhibited greater changes in elbow extensor strength (16 ± 10 vs. 1 ± 9%, P = 0.01) and upper-body power (6 ± 8 vs. -3 ± 7%, P < 0.01) compared to CONarm. Peripheral and central arterial stiffness did not change for either group (both P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Upper-body eccentric exercise improved dynamic muscular function while training at low exertion levels. Results occurred with minimal soreness and without compromising arterial function. ECCarm findings parallel eccentric leg cycling findings and indicate that eccentric cycle ergometry offers a robust model for enhancing upper-body muscular function. ECCarm could have applications in rehabilitation and sport training.
INTRODUCTION: Eccentric leg cycling (cycle ergometry adapted to impose muscle lengthening contractions) offers an effective exercise for restoring lower-body muscular function, maintaining health, and improving performance in clinical and athletic populations. PURPOSE: We extended this model to the upper body and evaluated the effectiveness of a 7-week eccentric arm cycling (ECCarm) intervention to improve upper-body muscular function. We also explored whether ECCarm would alter arterial function. METHODS:Participants performed ECCarm (n = 9) or concentric arm cycling (CONarm; n = 8) 3×/week while training intensity increased (5-20 min, 60-70% upper-body peak heart rate). Maximum elbow extensor strength, upper-body concentric power, and peripheral and central arterial stiffness were assessed before and after training. RESULTS: During training, heart rates and perceived exertion did not differ between groups (~68% upper-body peak heart rate, ~12 Borg units, both P > 0.05), whereas power during ECCarm was ~2× that for CONarm (122 ± 43 vs. 59 ± 20 W, P < 0.01). Muscle soreness for ECCarm was greater than CONarm (P = 0.02), however, soreness was minimal for both groups (<0.50 cm). Following training, ECCarm exhibited greater changes in elbow extensor strength (16 ± 10 vs. 1 ± 9%, P = 0.01) and upper-body power (6 ± 8 vs. -3 ± 7%, P < 0.01) compared to CONarm. Peripheral and central arterial stiffness did not change for either group (both P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Upper-body eccentric exercise improved dynamic muscular function while training at low exertion levels. Results occurred with minimal soreness and without compromising arterial function. ECCarm findings parallel eccentric leg cycling findings and indicate that eccentric cycle ergometry offers a robust model for enhancing upper-body muscular function. ECCarm could have applications in rehabilitation and sport training.
Authors: Athanasios Z Jamurtas; V Theocharis; T Tofas; A Tsiokanos; C Yfanti; V Paschalis; Y Koutedakis; K Nosaka Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2005-07-09 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: J Parry Gerber; Robin L Marcus; Leland E Dibble; Patrick E Greis; Robert T Burks; Paul C Lastayo Journal: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 4.751
Authors: Steven J Elmer; Camden S Marshall; Keith R McGinnis; Timothy A Van Haitsma; Paul C LaStayo Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2013-07-10 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Carol Ewing Garber; Bryan Blissmer; Michael R Deschenes; Barry A Franklin; Michael J Lamonte; I-Min Lee; David C Nieman; David P Swain Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: William L Haskell; I-Min Lee; Russell R Pate; Kenneth E Powell; Steven N Blair; Barry A Franklin; Caroline A Macera; Gregory W Heath; Paul D Thompson; Adrian Bauman Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Paul C LaStayo; Whitney Meier; Robin L Marcus; Ryan Mizner; Lee Dibble; Christopher Peters Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2009-03-31 Impact factor: 4.176