Literature DB >> 28516226

Benefit of adding digital breast tomosynthesis to digital mammography for breast cancer screening focused on cancer characteristics: a meta-analysis.

Seong Jong Yun1, Chang-Woo Ryu2, Sun Jung Rhee3, Jung Kyu Ryu3, Ji Young Oh3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated the benefit of adding digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) to full-field digital mammography (FFDM) compared to FFDM alone for breast cancer detection, focusing on cancer characteristics.
METHODS: We searched electronic databases and relevant references for published studies comparing DBT plus FFDM to FFDM alone for breast cancer screening. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) for various pathologic findings were determined using random effects models.
RESULTS: Eleven eligible studies were included. Pooled RRs showed a greater cancer detection for DBT plus FFDM than for FFDM alone for invasive cancer (1.327; 95% CI, 1.168-1.508), stage T1 (1.388; 95% CI, 1.137-1.695), nodal-negative (1.451; 95% CI, 1.209-1.742), all histologic grades (grade I, 1.812; grade II/III, 1.403), and histologic types of invasive cancer (ductal, 1.437; lobular, 1.901). However, adding DBT did not increase for detection of carcinoma in situ (1.198; 95% CI, 0.942-1.524), stage ≥T2 (1.391; 95% CI, 0.895-2.163), or nodal-positive cancer (1.336; 95% CI, 0.921-1.938). Heterogeneity among studies was not significant in any subset analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Adding DBT to FFDM enabled detection of early invasive breast cancer that might have been missed with FFDM alone. Knowing which cancer characteristic DBT detects may allow it to play a complementary role in predicting long-term patient outcomes and facilitate treatment planning.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast neoplasms; Digital breast tomosynthesis; Early detection of cancer; Mammography; Meta-analysis; Preventive health services

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28516226     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-017-4298-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  9 in total

Review 1.  Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Concepts and Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Alice Chong; Susan P Weinstein; Elizabeth S McDonald; Emily F Conant
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Advanced Imaging for Precision Medicine in Breast Cancer: From Morphology to Function.

Authors:  Katja Pinker
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Association of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography With Cancer Detection and Recall Rates by Age and Breast Density.

Authors:  Emily F Conant; William E Barlow; Sally D Herschorn; Donald L Weaver; Elisabeth F Beaber; Anna N A Tosteson; Jennifer S Haas; Kathryn P Lowry; Natasha K Stout; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Roberta M diFlorio-Alexander; Christopher I Li; Mitchell D Schnall; Tracy Onega; Brian L Sprague
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 31.777

4.  Effect of implementing digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) instead of mammography on population screening outcomes including interval cancer rates: Results of the Trento DBT pilot evaluation.

Authors:  Daniela Bernardi; Maria A Gentilini; Martina De Nisi; Marco Pellegrini; Carmine Fantò; Marvi Valentini; Vincenzo Sabatino; Andrea Luparia; Nehmat Houssami
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 4.380

5.  Accuracy and Effectiveness of Mammography versus Mammography and Tomosynthesis for Population-Based Breast Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Rodrigo Rosa Giampietro; Marcos Vinicius Gama Cabral; Silvana Andrea Molina Lima; Silke Anna Theresa Weber; Vania Dos Santos Nunes-Nogueira
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Frequency and diagnostic outcome of bilateral recall at screening mammography.

Authors:  Joost R C Lameijer; Joost Nederend; Adri C Voogd; Vivianne C G Tjan-Heijnen; Lucien E M Duijm
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  Diagnostic Efficacy across Dense and Non-Dense Breasts during Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Ultrasound Assessment for Recalled Women.

Authors:  Ibrahim Hadadi; Jillian Clarke; William Rae; Mark McEntee; Wendy Vincent; Ernest Ekpo
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-16

Review 8.  Breast Cancer-How Can Imaging Help?

Authors:  Roxana Iacob; Diana Luminita Manolescu; Emil Robert Stoicescu; Antonio Fabian; Daniel Malita; Cristian Oancea
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-22

Review 9.  Digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer screening and diagnosis in women with dense breasts - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xuan-Anh Phi; Alberto Tagliafico; Nehmat Houssami; Marcel J W Greuter; Geertruida H de Bock
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 4.430

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.