Seong Jong Yun1, Chang-Woo Ryu2, Sun Jung Rhee3, Jung Kyu Ryu3, Ji Young Oh3. 1. Department of Medicine, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, 26 Kyungheedae-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, 130-701, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, 892 Dongnam-ro, Gangdong-Gu, Seoul, 134-727, Republic of Korea. md.cwryu@gmail.com. 3. Department of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, 892 Dongnam-ro, Gangdong-Gu, Seoul, 134-727, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We evaluated the benefit of adding digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) to full-field digital mammography (FFDM) compared to FFDM alone for breast cancer detection, focusing on cancer characteristics. METHODS: We searched electronic databases and relevant references for published studies comparing DBT plus FFDM to FFDM alone for breast cancer screening. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) for various pathologic findings were determined using random effects models. RESULTS: Eleven eligible studies were included. Pooled RRs showed a greater cancer detection for DBT plus FFDM than for FFDM alone for invasive cancer (1.327; 95% CI, 1.168-1.508), stage T1 (1.388; 95% CI, 1.137-1.695), nodal-negative (1.451; 95% CI, 1.209-1.742), all histologic grades (grade I, 1.812; grade II/III, 1.403), and histologic types of invasive cancer (ductal, 1.437; lobular, 1.901). However, adding DBT did not increase for detection of carcinoma in situ (1.198; 95% CI, 0.942-1.524), stage ≥T2 (1.391; 95% CI, 0.895-2.163), or nodal-positive cancer (1.336; 95% CI, 0.921-1.938). Heterogeneity among studies was not significant in any subset analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Adding DBT to FFDM enabled detection of early invasive breast cancer that might have been missed with FFDM alone. Knowing which cancer characteristic DBT detects may allow it to play a complementary role in predicting long-term patient outcomes and facilitate treatment planning.
PURPOSE: We evaluated the benefit of adding digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) to full-field digital mammography (FFDM) compared to FFDM alone for breast cancer detection, focusing on cancer characteristics. METHODS: We searched electronic databases and relevant references for published studies comparing DBT plus FFDM to FFDM alone for breast cancer screening. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) for various pathologic findings were determined using random effects models. RESULTS: Eleven eligible studies were included. Pooled RRs showed a greater cancer detection for DBT plus FFDM than for FFDM alone for invasive cancer (1.327; 95% CI, 1.168-1.508), stage T1 (1.388; 95% CI, 1.137-1.695), nodal-negative (1.451; 95% CI, 1.209-1.742), all histologic grades (grade I, 1.812; grade II/III, 1.403), and histologic types of invasive cancer (ductal, 1.437; lobular, 1.901). However, adding DBT did not increase for detection of carcinoma in situ (1.198; 95% CI, 0.942-1.524), stage ≥T2 (1.391; 95% CI, 0.895-2.163), or nodal-positive cancer (1.336; 95% CI, 0.921-1.938). Heterogeneity among studies was not significant in any subset analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Adding DBT to FFDM enabled detection of early invasive breast cancer that might have been missed with FFDM alone. Knowing which cancer characteristic DBT detects may allow it to play a complementary role in predicting long-term patient outcomes and facilitate treatment planning.
Entities:
Keywords:
Breast neoplasms; Digital breast tomosynthesis; Early detection of cancer; Mammography; Meta-analysis; Preventive health services
Authors: Emily F Conant; William E Barlow; Sally D Herschorn; Donald L Weaver; Elisabeth F Beaber; Anna N A Tosteson; Jennifer S Haas; Kathryn P Lowry; Natasha K Stout; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Roberta M diFlorio-Alexander; Christopher I Li; Mitchell D Schnall; Tracy Onega; Brian L Sprague Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2019-05-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Daniela Bernardi; Maria A Gentilini; Martina De Nisi; Marco Pellegrini; Carmine Fantò; Marvi Valentini; Vincenzo Sabatino; Andrea Luparia; Nehmat Houssami Journal: Breast Date: 2019-09-30 Impact factor: 4.380
Authors: Joost R C Lameijer; Joost Nederend; Adri C Voogd; Vivianne C G Tjan-Heijnen; Lucien E M Duijm Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2020-07-17 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Roxana Iacob; Diana Luminita Manolescu; Emil Robert Stoicescu; Antonio Fabian; Daniel Malita; Cristian Oancea Journal: Healthcare (Basel) Date: 2022-06-22
Authors: Xuan-Anh Phi; Alberto Tagliafico; Nehmat Houssami; Marcel J W Greuter; Geertruida H de Bock Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2018-04-03 Impact factor: 4.430