| Literature DB >> 28516153 |
Ngii N Tazeh1, Daniel J Canter2, Shivashankar Damodaran1, Timothy Rushmer1, Kyle A Richards1, E Jason Abel1, David F Jarrard1, Tracy M Downs1.
Abstract
Introduction: Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is an indicator of systemic inflammation and has been proven to be associated with an increased risk of extravesical disease, decreased cancer specific survival and overall survival in bladder cancer patients. A large proportion of healthy African Americans have a WBC count that is persistently lower than the normal range defined for individuals of European ancestry, this condition has been called "benign ethnic neutropenia". The purpose of our study was to determine if NLR was different in patients of African ancestry (AA) vs European ancestry (EA) across different tumor grades and stages at the time of transurethral resection of bladder tumor(s) (TURBT). Materials andEntities:
Keywords: Bladder cancer; ethnicity; prognosis; transurethral resection
Year: 2017 PMID: 28516153 PMCID: PMC5409044 DOI: 10.3233/BLC-160085
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bladder Cancer
Patient demographics and hematological parameters
| Variable | AA | EA | |
| Number | 42 | 255 | |
| Age | 63 (59–72.5) | 67 (61–76) | 0.02 |
| BMI | 26.6 (24–31.9) | 27 (24.46–30.6) | 0.72 |
| Charlson comorbidity index | 8 (7–10) | 8.5 (7–10) | 0.31 |
| WBC count×1000 | 7.7 (6.2–9.1) | 6.8 (5.7–8.5) | 0.09 |
| Median neutrophil (%) | 55.9 (50.8–65.7) | 62.5 (56.3–68) | <0.01 |
| Median lymphocyte (%) | 32 (24.5–37.3) | 25.5 (20.2–30.2) | <0.01 |
| Median NLR | 1.7 (1.3–2.7) | 2.5 (1.8–3.3) | <0.01 |
Patient demographics and NLR associated parameters (Median/IQR) compared between EA and AA cohorts.
NLR means comparison across T stages and grade
| Stage | NLR mean ( | Median [IQR] | ||
| Ta | 2.5 | 2.2 [1.6–2.9] | ||
| T1 | 3.9 | 2.2 [1.7–3.4] | ||
| T2 | 3.8 | 3.5 [2.2–4.6] | 0.001 | |
| NLR was different across T stages. | ||||
| Ta | Low | 2.5 | 2.2 [1.6–2.9] | |
| Ta | High | 3.9 | 2.4 [1.8–2.9] | 0.57 |
| NLR was not different between low and high grade Ta. | ||||
NLR median with IQR stratified for Stage and Grade, compared between AA and EA cohorts
| Stage | AA | EA | |
| Ta Low | 1.5 (1.12–2.23) | 2.4 (1.67–2.99) | 0.005 |
| Ta High | 1.7 (1.47–2.01) | 2.4 (1.82–2.95) | 0.02 |
| T1 High | 1.6 (1.45–2.17) | 3.3 (2–3.53) | 0.006 |
| T2 High | 3.6 (3.06–3.73) | 3.5 (2.06–4.77) | 0.06 |
Stage and grade stratified NLR difference was statistically significant between Ta low grade, Ta high grade and T1 high grade tumors.
Fig.1Median NLR of Ta, T1 and T2 compared between the two ethnic groups. Individual T stage mean NLR compared in AA and EA cohort. The nonparametric variables were compared using Kruskal Wallis test. There was a statistically significant difference between the NLR of Ta, T1 and T2 stage tumors, with p values of <0.01 and 0.01 in AA and EA cohorts, respectively.